Emergency Antennas: Hos To Build A Slimjim Jpole d234y

/…iÊ ‡Ó\ÊÊ*œÀÌ>LiÊ6‡1Ê,œ‡1«Ê ‡«œiʘÌi˜˜>ÊvœÀÊ*ÕLˆVÊ-iÀÛˆVi 7")1.REVIEWSTHETHEORYOFTHEDUALBANDMETERCM* POLE ANTENNAANDTHENMAKESDETAILEDMEASUREMENTSOFAPRACTICAL EASYTO REPLICATE hROLL UPvPORTABLEANTENNA %DISON&ONG 7")1.

)T

HAS NOW BEEN MORE THAN THREE YEARS SINCE MY ARTICLE ON THE DUAL BAND * POLE $"* APPEARED IN THE &EBRUARY ISSUEOF134)HAVEHADOVERINQUIRES REGARDINGTHATANTENNA5SERSHAVEREPORTED GOOD RESULTS AND A FEW INDIVIDUALS EVEN BUILTTHEANTENNAANDCONFIRMEDTHEREPORTED MEASUREMENTS3EVERALMAJORCITIESAREUSING THISANTENNAFORTHEIRSCHOOLS CHURCHESAND EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER 7HEN ASKED WHYTHEYCHOOSETHE$"* THEMOSTCOM MON ANSWER WAS VALUE 7HEN BUDGETS ARE TIGHT AND YOU WANT A GOOD PERFORMANCE TO PRICERATIO THE$"* $UAL"AND* POLEn ISANEXCELLENTCHOICE )NQUANTITY THEMATERIALSCOSTABOUTPER ANTENNAANDWHATYOUGETISA6(&5(&BASE STATIONANTENNAWITHLVERTICALPERFORMANCE ONBOTH6(&AND5(&BANDS)FASMALLCITY BUILDSADOZENOFTHESEANTENNASFORSCHOOLS PUBLICBUILDINGS ETCITWOULDCOSTABOUT .OTFORONE BUTTHEENTIREDOZEN 3INCEITISCONSTRUCTEDUSING06#PIPE IT IS56PROTECTEDANDITISWATERPROOF4ODATE ) HAVE PERSONALLY CONSTRUCTED OVER OF THESE ANTENNAS FOR VARIOUS GROUPS AND INDI VIDUALSANDHAVEHADEXCELLENTRESULTS/NE HASWITHSTOODHARSHWINTERCONDITIONSINTHE MOUNTAINSOF-C#ALL )DAHOFORFOURYEARS 4HE MOST COMMON REQUEST FROM S IS FOR A PORTABLE hROLL UPv VERSION OF THIS ANTENNA FOR BACKPACKING OR EMERGENCY USE 4O ADDRESS THIS REQUEST ) WILL DESCRIBE HOW THEPRINCIPLESOFTHE$"* CANBEEXTENDED TOAPORTABLEROLL UPANTENNA3INCEITISTHE SECOND VERSION OF THIS ANTENNA ) CALL IT THE $"*

&IGUREˆ4HEORIGINALMETERRIBBON * POLEANTENNA

RADIALS4HE$"* ISEASYTOCONSTRUCTUSING INEXPENSIVEMATERIALSFROMYOURLOCALHARD WARESTORE&ORITSSIMPLICITYANDSMALLSIZE THE$"* OFFERSEXCELLENTPERFORMANCEAND CONSISTENTLY OUTPERFORMS A GROUND PLANE ANTENNA )TSRADIATIONPATTERNISCLOSETOTHATOFAN IDEAL VERTICAL DIPOLE BECAUSE IT IS END FED WITHVIRTUALLYNODISTORTIONOFTHERADIATION PATTERN DUE TO THE FEED LINE ! VERTICALLY POLARIZED CENTER FEDDIPOLEWILLALWAYSHAVE SOME DISTORTION OF ITS PATTERN BECAUSE THE FEEDLINECOMESOUTATITSCENTER EVENWHENA BALUNISUSED!VERTICALLYPOLARIZED CENTER FEDANTENNAISALSOPHYSICALLYMOREDIFFICULT TOCONSTRUCTBECAUSEOFTHATFEEDLINECOMING 0RINCIPLESOFTHE$"* OUTHORIZONTALLYFROMTHECENTER 4HEEARLIER$"* ISBASEDONTHE* POLE 4HEBASIC* POLEANTENNAISAHALF WAVE SHOWN IN &IGURE 5NLIKE THE POPULAR VERTICAL CONFIGURATION 5NLIKE A VERTICAL GROUNDPLANEANTENNA ITDOESNTNEEDGROUND DIPOLE WHICH BECAUSE OF ITS CENTER FEED IS USUALLYMOUNTEDALONGSIDEATOWERORSOME .OTESAPPEARONPAGE KINDOFMETALINGSTRUCTURE THERADIA

&ROM-ARCH134Ú!22,

TIONPATTERNOFANEND FED* POLEMOUNTEDAT THETOPOFATOWERISNOTDISTORTED 4HE * POLE WORKS BY MATCHING A LOW IMPEDANCE Ω FEED LINE TO THE HIGH IMPEDANCEATTHEENDOFAλVERTICALDIPOLE 4HIS IS ACCOMPLISHED WITH A λ MATCHING STUBSHORTEDATONEENDANDOPENATTHEOTHER 4HE IMPEDANCE REPEATS EVERY λ OR EVERY —AROUNDTHE3MITH#HART"ETWEENTHE SHORTEDENDANDTHEHIGHIMPEDANCEENDOF THEλSHORTEDSTUB THEREISAPOINTTHATIS CLOSETOΩ ANDTHISISWHERETHEΩCOAX ISCONNECTED "YEXPERIMENTING THISPOINTISFOUNDTO BEABOUTbINCHESFROMTHESHORTEDENDON METERS 4HIS MAKES INTUITIVE SENSE SINCE ΩISCLOSERTOASHORTTHANTOANOPENCIR CUIT !LTHOUGH THE 3MITH #HART SHOWS THAT THISPOINTISSLIGHTLYINDUCTIVE ITISSTILLAN EXCELLENTMATCHTOΩCOAX!TRESONANCE THE 372 IS BELOW &IGURE SHOWS THE DIMENSIONS FOR A METER * POLE 4HE bINCH λ SECTION SERVES AS THE QUARTER WAVEMATCHINGTRANSFORMER ! COMMONLY ASKED QUESTION IS h7HY bINCHESv )SNT A λ AT METERS ABOUT bINCHES9ES BUTTWINLEADHASAREDUCED VELOCITY FACTOR ABOUT COMPARED TO AIR ANDMUSTTHUSBESHORTENEDBYABOUT ! CONVENTIONAL * POLE CONFIGURATION WORKS WELL BECAUSE THERE IS DECOUPLING OF THE FEED LINE FROM THE λ RADIATOR ELEMENT SINCETHEFEEDLINEISINLINEWITHTHERADIAT ING λ ELEMENT 4HUS PATTERN DISTORTION IS MINIMIZED"UTTHISONLYDESCRIBESASINGLE BAND6(&* POLE(OWDOWEMAKETHISINTO ADUALBAND* POLE

!DDINGA3ECOND"ANDTOTHE * POLE 4OINCORPORATE5(&COVERAGEINTOA6(& * POLE REQUIRES SOME EXPLANATION ! MORE DETAILEDEXPLANATIONISGIVENINMY&EBRUARY 134 ARTICLE &IRST A METER ANTENNA DOESRESONATEAT5(&4HEKEYWORDHEREIS

&IGUREˆ4HEDUAL BAND* POLEMODIlED FORPORTABLEOPERATION ˆTHUSBECOMING THE$"* .OTETHAT THEDIMENSIONSARE SLIGHTLYLONGERTHAN THOSEIN&IGURE BECAUSEITISNOT ENCLOSEDINA06# DIELECTRICTUBE 0LEASETHAT THEEXACTDIMENSIONS VARYWITHTHEMANU FACTUREROFTHE7 LINE ESPECIALLYTHE EXACTTAPPOINTWHERE THE2' !FEED COAXFORTHERADIOIS CONNECTED

&IGUREˆ%LEVATIONPLANEPATTERN COMPARINGMETER* POLEONFUNDAMENTAL ANDONTHIRDHARMONICFREQUENCYCM WITHTHEANTENNAMOUNTEDFEETABOVE GROUND-OSTOFTHEENERGYATTHETHIRD HARMONICISLAUNCHEDATŽ

&IGUREˆ4HEλ5(&DECOUPLINGSTUBMADEOF2' ! COVEREDWITHHEATSHRINK TUBING4HISISSHOWNNEXTTOTHE".#CONNECTORTHATGOESTOTHETRANSCEIVER

&IGUREˆ4HEORIGINAL$"* DUAL BAND * POLE4HEDIMENSIONSGIVENASSUMETHAT THEANTENNAISINSERTEDINTOAbINCH#LASS 06#PIPE

RESONATE &OR EXAMPLE ANY ,# CIRCUIT CAN BE RESONANT BUT THAT DOES NOT IMPLY THAT IT WORKSWELLASANANTENNA2ESONATINGISONE THINGWORKINGWELLASANANTENNAISANOTHER 9OUSHOULDUNDERSTANDTHATAλ-(Z MATCHING STUB WORKS AS A λ MATCH ING STUB AT -(Z EXCEPT FOR THE SMALL AMOUNTOFEXTRATRANSMISSIONLINELOSSESOF THE EXTRA λ AT 5(& 4HE 5(& SIGNAL IS SIMPLY TAKING ONE MORE REVOLUTION AROUND THE3MITH#HART 4HE UNIQUENESS OF THE $"* CONCEPT IS THAT IT NOT ONLY RESONATES ON BOTH BANDS BUTALSOACTUALLYPERFORMSASAλRADIATOR ON BOTH BANDS !N INTERESTING FACT TO NOTE IS THAT ALMOST ALL ANTENNAS WILL RESONATE AT THEIRTHIRDHARMONICITWILLRESONATEONANY ODD HARMONIC ETC 4HIS IS WHY A METER DIPOLE CAN BE USED ON METERS 4HEDIFFERENCEISTHATTHEPERFORMANCEATTHE THIRDHARMONICISPOORWHENTHEANTENNAIS

USED IN A VERTICAL CONFIGURATION AS IN THE *POLESHOWNIN&IGURE4HISCANBEBEST EXPLAINEDBYAINCHMETERVERTICALOVER ANIDEALGROUNDPLANE!TMETERS ITISAλ LENGTH VERTICAL APPROXIMATELY INCHES !T 5(& -(Z IT IS A λ VERTICAL 5NFORTUNATELY THEADDITIONALλAT5(&IS OUTOFPHASEWITHTHEBOTTOMλ4HISMEANS CANCELLATION OCCURS IN THE RADIATION PATTERN ANDTHEMAJORITYOFTHEENERGYISLAUNCHEDAT ATAKEOFFANGLEOF—4HISRESULTSINABOUT ATOD"LOSSINTHEHORIZONTALPLANECOM PAREDTOACONVENTIONALλVERTICALPLACED OVERAGROUNDPLANE!HORIZONTALRADIATION PATTERN OBTAINED FROM %:.%# IS SHOWN IN &IGURE .OTICE THAT THE λ RADIATOR HAS MOSTOFITSENERGYAT— 4HUS ALTHOUGHANANTENNACANBEMADE TO WORK AT ITS THIRD HARMONIC ITS PERFOR MANCE IS POOR 7HAT WE NEED IS A SIMPLE RELIABLE METHOD TO DECOUPLE THE REMAINING λAT5(&OFAMETERRADIATOR BUTHAVE ITREMAINELECTRICALLYUNAFFECTEDAT6(&7E WANTINDEPENDENTλRADIATORSATBOTH6(& AND 5(& FREQUENCIES 4HE ORIGINAL $"* USED A COMBINATION OF COAXIAL STUBS AND ΩTWINLEADCABLE ASSHOWNIN&IGURE

2EFER TO &IGURE AND START FROM THE LEFT HAND BOTTOM 0ROCEED VERTICALLY TO THE 2' ! LEAD IN CABLE 4O CONNECT TO THE ANTENNA ABOUTFEETOF2' !WASUSED WITHA".#CONNECTORONTHEOTHEREND4HE λ 6(& IMPEDANCE TRANSFORMER IS MADE FROM Ω TWIN LEAD )TS APPROXIMATE LENGTH IS INCHES DUE TO THE VELOCITY FAC TOROFTHEΩMATERIAL4HEλPIECEIS SHORTED AT THE BOTTOM AND THUS IS AN OPEN CIRCUITHIGHIMPEDANCE ATTHEENDOFTHEλ SECTION4HISMATCHESWELLTOTHEλRADIATOR FOR 6(& 4HE Ω TAP IS ABOUT bINCHES FROMTHESHORT ASMENTIONEDBEFORE &OR 5(& OPERATION THE λ MATCHING STUB AT 6(& IS NOW A λ MATCHING STUB 4HISISELECTRICALLYA λSTUBWITHANADDI TIONALλINSERIES3INCETHEPURPOSEOFTHE MATCHING STUB IS FOR IMPEDANCE MATCHING AND NOT FOR RADIATION IT DOES NOT DIRECTLY AFFECTTHERADIATIONEFFICIENCYOFTHEANTENNA )T DOES HOWEVER SUFFER SOME TRANSMISSION LOSS FROM THE ADDITIONAL λ WHICH WOULD NOT BE NEEDED IF IT WERE NOT FOR THE DUAL BANDOPERATION)ESTIMATETHISLOSSATABOUT D" .EXT COMES THE λ RADIATING ELE MENTFOR5(& WHICHISABOUTINCHES4O &ROM-ARCH134Ú!22,

4ABLE -EASURED2ELATIVE0ERFORMANCEOFTHE$UAL BAND !NTENNAAT-(Z

4ABLE -EASURED2ELATIVE0ERFORMANCEOFTHE$UAL BAND !NTENNAAT-(Z

6(&&LEXIBLE 3TANDARD 6(&λ'0 !NTENNA 6(&* 0OLE RADIALS D" −D" D" REFERENCE

5(&&EXIBLE 3TANDARD 5(&λ'0 !NTENNA 6(&* 0OLE RADIALS D" −D" −D" REFERENCE

MAKEITELECTRICALLYTERMINATEATINCHES A λSHORTEDSTUBAT5(&ISCONSTRUCTEDUSING 2' !4HEOPENENDISTHENCONNECTED TO THE END OF THE INCHES OF Ω TWIN LEAD4HEOPENCIRCUITOFTHISλCOAXISONLY VALIDAT5(&!LSO NOTICETHATITISbINCHES ANDNOTINCHESDUETOTHEVELOCITYFACTOROF 2' ! WHICHISABOUT !T THE SHORTED END OF THE b INCH 2' ! IS THE FINAL INCHES OF Ω TWINLEAD 4HUS THE INCHES FOR THE 5(& λ THE b INCHES OF 2' ! FOR THE DECOUPLINGSTUBAT5(& ANDTHEINCHES OFTWINLEADPROVIDEFORTHEλATMETERS 4HETOTALDOESNOTADDUPTOAFULLINCHES THAT YOU MIGHT THINK 4HIS IS BECAUSE THE λ 5(& 2' ! SHORTED STUB IS INDUC TIVEATMETERS THUSSLIGHTLYSHORTENINGTHE ANTENNA

-AKINGIT0ORTABLE 4HE SINGLE MOST COMMON QUESTION THAT PEOPLEASKEDREGARDINGTHE$"* ISHOWIT COULDBEMADEPORTABLE4HEORIGINAL$"* HADTHEANTENNAINSERTEDINTO#LASS06# PIPETHATWASFEETLONG4HISWASFINEFOR FIXEDOPERATIONBUTWOULDHARDLYBESUITABLE FORPORTABLEUSE"ASICALLYTHENEWANTENNA HADTOHAVETHEABILITYTOBEROLLEDUPWHEN NOTINUSEANDHADTOBEDURABLEENOUGHFOR USEINEMERGENCYCOMMUNICATIONS 4HECHALLENGEWASTOTRANSFERTHECONCEPTS DEVELOPEDFORTHE$"* ANDAPPLYTHEMTO A DURABLE ROLL UP PORTABLE ANTENNA !FTER MUCHTHOUGHTANDEXPERIMENTING )ADOPTED THECONFIGURATIONSHOWNIN&IGURE 4HE MAJOR CHALLENGE WAS KEEPING THE ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS THE SAME AS THE ORIGINAL $"* BUT PHYSICALLY CONSTRUCTING IT FROM A CONTINUOUS PIECE OF Ω TWIN LEAD!NYFULLSPLICESONTHETWINLEADWOULD COMPROMISETHEDURABILITY SOTOELECTRICALLY DISCONNECT SECTIONS OF THE TWINLEAD ) CUT SMALL bINCHNOTCHESTOACHIEVETHEPROPER RESONANCES ) LEFT THE INSULATING BACKBONE OF THE Ω TWINLEAD FULLY INTACT ) DETER MINEDTHETWONOTCHESCLOSETOTHEλ5(& DECOUPLING STUB BY EXPERIMENT TO GIVE THE BEST372ANDBANDWIDTH "ECAUSETHISANTENNADOESNOTSITINSIDE A DIELECTRIC 06# TUBE THE DIMENSIONS ARE ABOUT LONGER THAN THE ORIGINAL $"* &ROM-ARCH134Ú!22,

$UAL "AND * 0OLE D"

) USED HEAT SHRINK TUBING TO COVER AND PRO TECT THE 5(& λ DECOUPLING STUB AND THE FOUR bINCH NOTCHES 3IMILARLY ) PROTECTED WITHHEATSHRINK TUBING THE 2' ! COAX INTERFACE TO THE Ω TWINLEAD ) ALSO ATTACHEDASMALL4EFLONTIESTRAPTOTHETOP OFTHEANTENNASOTHATITMAYBECONVENIENTLY ATTACHEDTOANONCONDUCTIVESTRING &IGURESHOWSAPICTUREOFTHEλ5(& MATCHINGSTUBINSIDETHEHEATSHRINKTUBING 4HE$"* CANEASILYFITINSIDEAPOUCHORA LARGEPOCKET)TISFARLESSCOMPLEXTHANWHAT WOULD BE NEEDED FOR A SINGLE BAND GROUND PLANE YETTHISANTENNAWILLCONSISTENTLYOUT PERFORMAGROUNDPLANEUSINGORRADIALS 3ETUPTIMEISLESSTHANAMINUTE )VE CONSTRUCTED MORE THAN A HUNDRED OFTHESEANTENNAS4HETOPOFTHE$"* IS AHIGHIMPEDANCEPOINT SOOBJECTSEVENIF THEY ARE NONMETALLIC MUST BE AS FAR AWAY ASPOSSIBLEFORBESTPERFORMANCE4HEOTHER SENSITIVEPOINTSARETHEOPENENDOFTHEλ 6(&MATCHINGSECTIONANDTHEOPENENDOF THEλ5(&DECOUPLINGSTUB !S WITH ANY ANTENNA IT WORKS BEST AS HIGHASPOSSIBLEANDINTHECLEAR4OHOISTTHE ANTENNA USENON CONDUCTINGSTRING&ISHING LINEALSOWORKSWELL

$UAL "AND * 0OLE D"

IS SIGNIFICANT ) HAVE CONFIDENCE IN THESE MEASUREMENTSSINCETHEFLEXIBLEANTENNAIS ABOUT − D" FROM THAT OF THE λ GROUND PLANE ANTENNA WHICH AGREES WELL WITH THE LITERATURE !LSONOTICETHATAT5(& THELOSSFORTHE FLEXANTENNAISONLYD" COMPAREDTOTHE GROUND PLANE 4HIS IS BECAUSE THE FLEXIBLE ANTENNA AT 5(& IS ALREADY INCHES LONG WHICHISAQUARTERWAVE3OTHEMAJORDIFFER ENCEFORTHEFLEXIBLEANTENNAAT5(&ISTHE LACKOFGROUNDRADIALS

3UMMARY

) PRESENTED HOW TO CONSTRUCT A PORTABLE ROLL UP DUAL BAND * POLE )VE DISCUSSED ITS BASICTHEORYOFOPERATION ANDHAVEPRESENTED EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS COMPARING THE $"* TO A STANDARD GROUND PLANE A TRADITIONAL METER * POLE AND A FLEXIBLE ANTENNA 4HE $"* ANTENNA IS EASY TO CONSTRUCT IS LOW COST AND IS VERY COMPACT )T SHOULD BE AN ASSET FOR !2%3 APPLICATIONS )T OFFERS SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENT IN BOTH THE 6(& AND5(&BANDSCOMPAREDTOTHESTOCKFLEX IBLE ANTENNA ANTENNA INCLUDED WITH A HAND HELDTRANSCEIVER )F YOU DO NOT HAVE THE EQUIPMENT TO CONSTRUCTORTUNETHISANTENNAATBOTH6(& -EASURED2ESULTS AND5(& THEANTENNAISAVAILABLEFROMTHE ) MEASURED THE $"* IN AN OPEN FIELD AUTHORTUNEDTOYOURDESIREDFREQUENCY#OST USING AN !DVANTEST 2 3PECTRUM IS% MAILHIMFORDETAILS !NALYZER4HERESULTSARESHOWNIN4ABLE .OTES 4HEANTENNAGIVESAD"IMPROVEMENTOVER % &ONG h4HE $"* !6(& 5(& $UAL "AND AFLEXIBLEANTENNAAT6(&)NACTUALPRACTICE * 0OLE v134 &EB PP SINCE THE ANTENNA CAN BE MOUNTED HIGHER * 2EYNANTE h!N %ASY $UAL "AND 6(&5(& !NTENNA v134 3EP PP THANTHEFLEXIBLEANTENNAATTHEENDOFYOUR HANDHELD RESULTSOFD"ARENOTUNCOM MON4HISISTHEELECTRICALEQUIVALENTOFGIV %D&ONGWASFIRSTLICENSEDINAS7.)1. INGA7HANDHELDABOOSTTO7 (E LATER UPGRADED TO !MATEUR %XTRA CLASS 4HE $"* PERFORMS AS PREDICTED ON WITHHISPRESENTCALLOF7")1.(EOBTAINED METERS )T BASICALLY HAS THE SAME PERFOR "3%% AND -3%% DEGREES FROM THE 5NIVERSITY MANCEASASINGLEBAND* POLE WHICHGIVES OF#ALIFORNIAAT"ERKELEYANDHIS0H$FROMTHE ABOUTAD"IMPROVEMENTOVERAλGROUND 5NIVERSITYOF3AN&RANCISCO!3ENIOR-EMBER PLANE ANTENNA 4HERE IS NO MEASURABLE OF THE )%%% HE HAS PATENTS PUBLISHED DEGRADATION IN PERFORMANCE BY INCORPORAT PAPERS AND A BOOK IN THE AREA OF COMMUNICA TIONS AND INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DESIGN 0RESENTLY INGTHE5(&CAPABILITYINTOACONVENTIONAL HEISEMPLOYEDBYTHE5NIVERSITYOF#ALIFORNIA * POLE AT "ERKELEY TEACHING GRADUATE CLASSES IN 2& 4HE $"* S IMPROVED PERFORMANCE DESIGNANDISA0RINCIPAL%NGINEERAT.ATIONAL IS APPARENT AT 5(& WHERE IT OUTPERFORMS 3EMICONDUCTOR 3ANTA#LARA #ALIFORNIAWORKING THE SINGLE BAND METER * POLE OPERATING WITH#-/3ANALOGCIRCUITS9OUCANREACHTHE AT 5(& BY ABOUT D" 3EE 4ABLE 4HIS AUTHORATEDISON?FONG HOTMAILCOM

Building an Emergency J-Pole By Phil Karras, KE3FL June 15, 1999

This type of J-Pole has been written about in QST, and the description has appeared elsewhere (see "Bibliography," below). The J-Pole is not difficult to make, even for a beginner. This antenna works well on 2-meters; it also works on 440 MHz. If you look at the antenna, it is a 3/4- Some Past J-Pole Articles in QST: wavelength radiating section attached to the matching stub by the shorting bar; all together QST Jul 1995, p 62, "Build a it looks like the letter J, hence the name J-pole. Weatherproof PVC J-Pole Antenna," QST Jun 1995, p 71, "Try A 2-Meter Read all of these instructions before beginning Flexi-J Antenna" your construction project. Nothing is more QST Sep 1994, p 61, "An Easy Dual-Band frustrating than doing something, only to find a VHF/UHF Antenna" hint afterwards that would have made the QST Apr 1982, p 43, (This was the article project go smoother. for a wire J-pole antenna I was able to find in QST). See below for a listing of parts and tools you'll need to make up this simple antenna.

Larger picture available here. Using "ladder line" is a bit different than using solid-dielectric TV twinlead. Before cutting, stretch out the wire so that you can position the proposed cuts at a position that has a center plastic , and not at a position that has no center plastic. This may not be possible for both the 1/4-wavelength section and the total length position. If it comes down to a choice, I recommend selecting the at the top. This plastic melts well and can be melted back together. I have had to melt sections back together in both locations, and the antennas work just fine and hold up to field rigors.

Select the bottom of the antenna and strip off about 3 to 3-1/2 inches of insulation from both wires. Tack solder (temporary solder t) a piece of wire as a shorting bar about 1 inch from the bottom of the antenna (this bar may need to be moved). To start with, the coax will be connected about 1-1/4 inch from the shorting bar. This connection and the shorting bar connection may need to be moved in order to achieve the best SWR and frequency match. Measure 17 inches up from the shorting bar on one end only and cut a 1/4-inch gap in the wire at this position. (You can melt the plastic back together at this location if needed.) Now measure 52-1/4 inches up from the shorting bar. If this location has no center plastic , try to remove as little insulation as needed in order to get at the wire and snip it. Cut out at least one inch of wire, then melt the plastic back onto the locations where you removed it. I use a sharp knife to cut into the insulation and not into the wire. Then I pry the wire out with a pin and snip it or solder it at the correct location.

Preparing the Coax Bend the coax about an inch from the end, and score the insulation with a sharp knife. This cuts into the insulation without damaging the shield if done gently. Then rotate the coax so you can continue scoring the coax until it is cut all the way around. Cut the insulation from the new cut, up to the end of the coax. You should now be able to pull off the insulation with pliers. to always cut away from yourself! Never use wire strippers on the large portion of the coax; it only damages the shield. If you have a tool designed for coax, use it. Prepare the antenna end of the coax: Separate the coax shield and twist it together. Strip off about 3/4-inch of insulation from the center conductor of the coax. (Do not solder at this time.) You'll install the appropriate connector (BNC, PL-259) at the other end of the coax. Follow the installation directions that come with the connector, or consult The ARRL Handbook for more information.

Connecting Coax to Antenna Wrap the shield 1-1/4 inch up from the shorting bar around the 17-inch side of the twin lead. Wrap it in such a way that the distance from the coax to the shorting bar is the same for both the shield and the center conductor. Solder the shield to the twin lead. Wrap the center coax conductor around the longer twin lead wire up from the shorting bar (the same distance that the shield is wrapped to the other wire) and solder it. Cut off the excess coax wire. Also, cut off all the excess twin lead at the top except for a loop or two. These ladder steps are great for hanging the antenna over a nail or hook, so leave at least one of them.

Your antenna is now ready to test.

Testing Your J-Pole Get your VHF SWR analyzer or meter. Hang the antenna away from all objects (I hang mine from the top of a window and this seems to work almost as well as from a tree). For best SWR measurements, the antenna should be at least 2 wavelengths away from any object. (For 2-meters this is approximately 13 feet.) Set your radio for lowest power and 146.000 MHz simplex. Test out the antenna for 144.000 and 148.000 as well. If all three are below 1.7 SWR and the SWR for 146 is about 1.3 or lower, you are done. If not, see for the sidebar "Help for Lowering the SWR, Changing the Frequency, and Increasing the Bandwidth" below. Once you are done, slip the shrink tubing onto the antenna over the coax connections, squirt some electrical-connection safe RTV into the bottom of the shrink tubing, and then heat up the tubing from the bottom up. This should push (squeeze) some RTV all the way to the top of the shrink tubing. Wipe off the excess and hang the antenna for 12 to 24 hours to let the RTV dry. The SWR at 146.0 should be close to and below 1.3 to 1; for 144.0 and 148.0, it should be 1.7 to 1 or lower. If you have difficulty obtaining these results, see "Help for Lowering the SWR, Changing the Frequency, and Increasing the Bandwidth", below. At 445.0 MHz, the antenna should read below 1.5 to 1. I have not checked it out as thoroughly as I have 2 meters, but I do know that it is not a nice one-dip curve; rather, it is a multiple dip/peak curve. Editor's note: Philip Karras, KE3FL, lives in Mt Airy, Maryland. An ARRL Life Member, he holds a field appointment as Assistant Emergency Coordinator in Carroll County, Maryland. He's also an OES, ORS, and a volunteer examiner. He may be ed via e-mail to [email protected]. Visit his Web site at http://www.qsl.net/ke3fl.

PARTS LIST: 5 feet of 20 feet of 2 inches of heat-shrinkable tubing

RG-58

450-ohm

ladder similar

or

line coax

NECESSARY TOOLS: Soldering iron Solder Wire Wire VHF SWR meter or Sharp Pliers RTV silicone Heat gun or hair dryer (for heat-shrinkable tubing)

(20-30

antenna

W) cutters strippers analyzer knife sealant

Help for Lowering the SWR, Changing the Frequency, and Increasing the Bandwidth If your antenna did not have a nice low SWR at the desired center frequency, try moving the shorting bar down about 0.1 inch at a time until you get the lowest SWR you can--even if this is nowhere close to 1:1. You may have to move it back up if you go too far. Normally I find that I have to move the shorting bar down, ie, away from the feed-point, but it's always possible that it will need to go the other way too. If you have already cut the extra wire off the bottom of the antenna, you will need to add some back if moving the shorting bar closer to the feed-point only makes the SWR worse. Add about two inches to both the matching stub and radiator at the bottom of the antenna. Once the position of the shorting bar to the feed point that produces the lowest SWR has been found, move the coax points and the shorting bar together until you can get this lowest SWR match at the desired frequency. The important point to here is that the distance between the feed-point and the shorting bar determines the lowest SWR. This distance must not change while trying to get the lowest SWR at the desired center frequency. If the lowest SWR you can get by moving the shorting is not 1:1, it will turn out to be closer to 1:1 once you move both the shorting bar and the coax feed point so that the lowest SWR is at the desired center frequency. Help on Shifting the Frequency If you need to shift the frequency and moving the tap point doesn't change it enough, you can cut the J-Pole. You should not have to do this for this antenna since the dimensions for this antenna have been worked out over years of experience by many different people. Here are the two rules of thumb for changing the center frequency of any antenna: LLL: Longer antenna = Longer wavelength = Lower frequency SSH: Shorter antenna = Shorter wavelength = Higher frequency When cutting the antenna shorter, I recommend making only one-half the change you calculate. In this way you may be able to prevent making too large a cut and having to undo it. All changes are interactive, some more so than others, but expect to see SWR changes for length changes, and frequency shifts when moving the shorting bar/feed-point up and down. ( to move both the feed-point and the shorting bar in tandem, keeping the distance between them constant when trying to re-center the lowest SWR at the frequency you want.) Help on Increasing the Bandwidth (BW) Once again you should not ever have this problem with the 2-meter J-pole since the dimensions have been worked out by calculation and by trial and error by many people. However, if you are trying to design for a new frequency, you might need to be able to change the BW. A very narrow BW may be an indication that the radiator is too long, or it is too long in relation to the matching stub. I have only performed one experiment so far. In this experiment I added

one inch of wire to the top of a good working J-pole antenna for 2-meters. The bandwidth dropped to about 0.6 MHz. When I removed the extra wire, the BW returned to about 3.8 MHz between 1.7:1 SWR points. Other things I've tried made such small changes in the bandwidth that I was never sure the data was significant. Was the change due to the method tried or did I do something else a bit differently that caused the change?

F ebruary 1995 Q S T Volume 79, Number 2

way is to obtain the angle of declination from a topographic map. Often referred to as the variation angle in air and sea navigation, this angle is simply the difference between true and magnetic North at a specified location. By knowing this angle, you can correct your com reading for true North. You can learn more about coordinates, great-circle headings, topographic maps and associated computer programs by reading the “Lab Notes” column in the April 1994 Q S T. Q: I’m getting terrible interference to my VHF transceiver from my computer. Is this interference coming directly from the U? A: It’s rare to have interference directly from the U, but it is possible. Most computer interference is radiated by the wiring, primarily between peripheral devices (printers, modems, joysticks and so on). High-quality shielded cables are a good start toward solving this problem. Wrapping the cables though large toroids such as the FT-240-61 may also help. Consider the shielding on your computer, too. The quality and amount of shielding can vary considerably. The better computers have metal cabinet covers that must be removed if you want to replace or add any components. Some hams have even gone to the trouble of lining their computer cabinets with metal foil! Q: I built the dual-band J-pole antenna from the article in the September 1994 N ew H am C ompanion (“An Easy Dual-Band VHF/UHF Antenna,” page 61), but I just can’t get it to work. What can I do? A: Try adding a balun to the coax. A balun is necessary because a J-pole antenna uses a balanced feed (the 1/4-wavelength matching section) connected to an unbalanced feed line (the coax). The simplest way to make a balun is to get a split-core cylindrical ferrite (such as an Amidon 2X-43-251) and attach it to the outside of the coax 1/4 wavelength from the feedpoint. On VHF frequencies some ferrite materials are not effective, so be sure to get type 43 material for best results. Another thing you may want to do is lengthen the antenna a bit. The formula for the antenna length in the article is unintentionally misleading. Because the 1/2-wavelength radiator is not a feed line, it has a much higher velocity factor than that of twin lead. The velocity factor of copper wire is about 0.95, so the 1/2-wave radiator section should be 38-3/8 inches long. Q: Harvey Zion, KI7EG, asks, “One of our local club a fellow with a General licensewants to provide a gateway from our VHF packet network to the 20-meter packet subband. What if a Technician on 2 meters uses the gateway to reach 20 meters. Would that be legal?” A: Yes, the Technician can legally use the gateway. The Technician is the control operator of his or her 2-meter station only. The gateway is a separate station operating under the privileges of its licensee and/or control operator. This same situation applies to repeaters with outputs on frequencies for which a may not have privileges, as long as the can legally operate on the input frequency. (Two-meter to 10-meter FM repeaters are good examples.) The 20-meter gateway raises other questions, however. Such a system is legal only if a control operator is present at the station’s control point. Remote control is okay, but it must be via a wire line, or take place on a frequency above 222.15 MHz. No station operating below 50 MHz can be automatically controlled with the following exceptions: ο Repeaters operating above 29.5 MHz ο The 50 packet stations that have been granted Special Temporary Authorization (STA) for HF packet forwarding. ο Beacons operating between 28.2 and 28.3 MHz. ο The NCDXF beacon system on 14.1 MHz. Some stations have set up automatic digital mailboxes on HF, but these are not legal at the present time. There is a rule change under consideration by the FCC that will permit limited automatic digital operation on some HF frequencies. Watch future issues of Q S T for more information. Q: Scott Long, WD8NSD, asks, “I have an unusual interference problem; my television is interfering with me! I hear a strong signal on 3.58 MHz every time I hook my TV up to an outside antenna. This is my favorite 80-meter frequency.

Page 18 - Copyright © 1996 American Radio Relay League, Inc. All rights reserved

VK5AH 4 Bander

Page 8 of 9

Back to Contents http://s.picknowl.com.au/~wavetel/antennas.htm

10/16/2007