Wrc 297 Vs Wrc 107 4y645

Whenever Pressure Vessel or Heat exchanger (Static Equipments) nozzle loads exceeds the allowable values provided by Vendors (Equipment manufacturer) or standard project specific tables (guidelines), the piping stress professional is permitted to use WRC 107/297 (or any other FEA) to check the stresses at the Nozzle-Shell junction point and check the stresses with allowable values provided by Codes. If the stresses are found to be within allowable limit then the load and moment values can be accepted without any hesitation. However there are some boundary conditions which must be met before using WRC. This small write up will try to explain the required details for performing WRC 107 and WRC 297 using Caesar II and step by step method for performing WRC check.Both WRC 107 and WRC 297 deal with “local” stress states in the vicinity of an attachment to a vessel or pipe. As indicated by their titles, WRC-107 can be used for attachments to both spherical and cylindrical shells while WRC-297 only addresses cylinder to cylinder connections. While both bulletins are used for nozzle connection. WRC-107 is based on unpenetrated shell, while WRC-297 assumes a circular opening in vessel. Furthermore, WRC-107 defines values for solid and hollow attachments of either round and rectangular shape for spherical shells but drops the solid/hollow distinction for attachments to cylindrical shells. WRC-297, on the other hand, is intended only for cylindrical nozzles attached to cylindrical shells.

Boundary condition for using WRC 107: To determine whether WRC 107 bulletin can be used for local stress checking the following geometry guidelines must be met: 1. d/D<0.33 2. Dm/T=(D-T)/T>50 (Here, T=Vessel Thickness, Dm=mean diameter of vessel) Boundary condition for using WRC 297: To determine whether WRC 107 bulletin can be used for local stress checking the following geometry guidelines must be met: 1. d/D<=0.5 2. d/t>=20 and d/t<=100 (Here t=nozzle thickness) 3. D/T>=20 and D/T<=2500 4.d/T>=5 5. Nozzle must be isolated (it may not be close to a discontinuity) – not within 2√(DT) on vessel and not within 2√(dt) on nozzle Difference between WRC 107 and 297: The major differences other than the boundary conditions mentioned above are listed below: 1. WRC 107 calculates only the vessel stresses while WRC 297 calculates Vessel stresses along with nozzle stresses. 2. WRC 297 is applicable only for normally (perpendicular) intersecting two cylindrical shells whereas WRC 107 is applicable for cylindrical as well as spherical shells of any intersection. 3. The attachments for WRC 297 checking must be hollow but WRC 107 analyzes cylindrical or rectangular attachments which can be rigid or hollow.4. WRC 297 is not applicable for nozzles protruding inside the vessel (Fig 1), Tangential Nozzle (Fig2), Nozzle at angle (Fig 3).

5. Typically, WRC-107 is used for local stress calculations and WRC-297 is used for flexibility calculations. Limitations of WRC: Other than boundary conditions mentioned above there are few more limitations as mentioned below: 1. Neither bulletin considers shell reinforcement nor do they address stress due to pressure. 2. CAESAR II ,PVElite & CodeCalc will not extrapolate data from the charts when geometric limitations mentioned above are exceeded. Extrapolated data may not be appropriate