Jeff Doyle Bgp 5b1d2l

Routing T/IP, Volume II CCIE Professional Development, Second Edition Jeff Doyle

Cisco Press 800 East 96th Street Indianapolis, IN 46240

ii

Routing T/IP, Volume II

Routing T/IP, Volume II CCIE Professional Development, Second Edition Jeff Doyle Copyright© 2017 Cisco Systems, Inc. Published by: Cisco Press 800 East 96th Street Indianapolis, IN 46240 USA All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the publisher, except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review. Printed in the United States of America First Printing August 2016 Library of Congress Control Number: 2016936742 ISBN-13: 978-1-58705-470-9 ISBN-10: 1-58705-470-1

Warning and Disclaimer This book is designed to provide information about routing T/IP. Every effort has been made to make this book as complete and as accurate as possible, but no warranty or fitness is implied. The information is provided on an “as is” basis. The authors, Cisco Press, and Cisco Systems, Inc. shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damages arising from the information contained in this book or from the use of the discs or programs that may accompany it. The opinions expressed in this book belong to the author and are not necessarily those of Cisco Systems, Inc.

Trademark Acknowledgments All mentioned in this book that are known to be trademarks or service marks have been appropriately capitalized. Cisco Press or Cisco Systems, Inc., cannot attest to the accuracy of this information. Use of a term in this book should not be regarded as affecting the validity of any trademark or service mark.

Special Sales For information about buying this title in bulk quantities, or for special sales opportunities (which may include electronic versions; custom cover designs; and content particular to your business, training goals, marketing focus, or branding interests), please our corporate sales department at [email protected].

iii

Information At Cisco Press, our goal is to create in-depth technical books of the highest quality and value. Each book is crafted with care and precision, undergoing rigorous development that involves the unique expertise of from the professional technical community. Readers’ is a natural continuation of this process. If you have any comments regarding how we could improve the quality of this book, or otherwise alter it to better suit your needs, you can us through email at [email protected]. Please make sure to include the book title and ISBN in your message. We greatly appreciate your assistance. Editor-in-Chief: Mark Taub Product Line Manager: Brett Bartow Alliances Manager, Cisco Press: Ron Fligge Managing Editor: Sandra Schroeder Development Editor: Christopher Cleveland Project Editor: Deadline Driven Publishing Copy Editor: Deadline Driven Publishing Technical Editors: Darien Hirotsu, Pete Moyer Editorial Assistant: Vanessa Evans Cover Designer: Chuti Prasertsith Composition: Patricia Ratcliff Indexer: Angie Martin Proofreader: Deadline Driven Publishing

iv

Routing T/IP, Volume II

About the Author Jeff Doyle, CCIE No. 1919, is vice president of research at Fishtech Labs. Specializing in IP routing protocols, SDN/NFV, data center fabrics, MPLS, and IPv6, Jeff has designed or assisted in the design of large-scale IP service provider and enterprise networks in 26 countries over 6 continents. He worked with early IPv6 adopters in Japan, China, and South Korea, and has advised service providers, government agencies, military contractors, equipment manufacturers, and large enterprises on best-practice IPv6 deployment. He now advises large enterprises on evolving data center infrastructures, SDN, and SD-WAN. Jeff is the author of CCIE Professional Development: Routing T/IP, Volumes I and II and OSPF and IS-IS: Choosing an IGP for Large-Scale Networks; a co-author of Software Defined Networking: Anatomy of OpenFlow; and an editor and contributing author of Juniper Networks Routers: The Complete Reference. He also writes for Forbes and blogs for both Network World and Network Computing. Jeff is one of the founders of the Rocky Mountain IPv6 Task Force, is an IPv6 Forum Fellow, and serves on the executive board of the Colorado chapter of the Internet Society (ISOC). Jeff lives in Westminster, Colorado, with his wife Sara and a Sheltie named Max, the Forrest Gump of the dog world. Jeff and Sara count themselves especially fortunate that their four grown children and a growing herd of grandchildren all live within a few miles.

About the Contributing Authors Khaled W. Abuelenain, CCIE No. 27401, is currently the consulting director for Acuative, a Cisco Certified Managed Services Master Partner, at the company’s EMEA office in Saudi Arabia. He is a certified double CCIE (R&S, SP), holds a B.Sc. degree in electronics and communication engineering from Ain Shams University, Egypt, and is an IEEE member since 1997. Khaled has been deg, operating, or optimizing largescale networks for more than 14 years throughout the Middle East, typically for service providers and mobile operators with multinational presence, banks, and government agencies. He has extensive experience in routing, BGP, MPLS, and IPv6. Khaled is also an expert on data center technologies and network programmability, with a special interest in Python programming for SDN solutions. He is an active member of both the Cloud Computing and SDN IEEE societies. Nicolas Michel, dual CCIE No. 29410 R/S and DC, is a network architect with 10 years of experience in several fields: routing switching, data center, and unified communications. Nicolas is a former Sergeant in the French Air Force and started to work as a network engineer during the time he was serving. He has worked on several NATO-related projects. He decided to move to Switzerland in 2011, to work for the local leading networking consulting company. He was the principal UC architect for the UEFA EURO 2016 football tournament.

v

Nicolas is also an eager reader about emerging network technologies (SDN, Automation/ Network programmability). He blogs at http://vpackets.net and is also a president for a nongovernmental organization that helps children with autism. He participates in an open source network simulation project: http://www.unetlab.com/. Nicolas is actually trying to relocate to the United States. From Nicolas: I would like to dedicate the work I have done on this book to my wonderful wife who has ed me throughout my career and helps me become a better engineer and a better man. I wouldn’t be the same man without her. Also I would like to dedicate this work to my kids and my parents, who taught me to never give up and to enjoy every moment. Finally, I would express my heartfelt thanks to Jeff Doyle for giving me the opportunity to work on this project. I learned so many things and I still can’t believe how lucky I was.

About the Technical Reviewers Darien Hirotsu is a networking professional who has been in the industry for nearly a decade working on service provider, data center, and enterprise networks. He earned a master’s degree in network engineering from UC Santa Cruz and a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. He also holds multiple expert level certifications, and is equally ionate about both the software and networking parts of SDN. Darien would like to send extra special thanks to his fiancé Rebecca Nguyen. Editing this book was both rewarding and time consuming. During the whole process and through the long weekends, Rebecca’s love, , and patience never wavered, and for that, he will always be grateful. Thank you for everything you do, Rebecca! Pete Moyer is an old-timer IP/MPLS consulting engineer who has turned his focus toward SDN in recent years. He has multivendor experience in IP networking, having earned the first awarded JNCIE in the early 2000s and his CCIE in the late 1990s. He is a co-author and technical editor of several networking books on IP and SDN and has authored many articles and blogs on various networking topics. His current focus is on large-scale data center and service provider networks, including the Research & Education Network (REN) market. He also holds a B.S. degree in CMIS from the University of Maryland.

vi

Routing T/IP, Volume II

Dedications This book is dedicated to my wife Sara; my children, Anna, Carol, James, and Katherine; and my grandchildren, Claire, Caroline, and Sam. They are my refuge, and they keep me sane, humble, and happy.

vii

Acknowledgments An author of a technical book is just a front for a small army of brilliant, dedicated people. This book is no exception. At the risk of sounding like I’m making an Academy Award acceptance speech, I would like to thank a number of those people. I would like to thank Khaled Abu El Enian and Nicolas Michel, who contributed many new end-of-chapter configuration and troubleshooting exercises. Khaled also helped me out in a time crunch and wrote most sections in “Scaling BGP Functions” in Chapter 5, “Scaling BGP.” I hope we can collaborate even closer on a future book or two. I would also like to thank Pete Moyer, my longtime friend and associate, who has been a technical reviewer for every book I’ve written alone and has been a co-author on several other books. Pete has had a profound influence on my life beyond this and other book projects, and I will always be indebted to him. Darien Hirotsu is the other technical reviewer on this book, and it’s the first time we have worked together on a book project, although we have been associates across multiple companies and engineering projects. Darien is astoundingly detail-oriented and caught countless tiny errors throughout my manuscript. My gratitude goes to Chris Cleveland for his expert guidance as development editor. We have collaborated on multiple books, and he has made each one a better book and me a better writer. Thanks to Brett Bartow and all the folks at Cisco Press. Brett has shown superhuman patience with me as the book schedule constantly fell victim to “day job” priorities. He has continued to show me great kindness throughout the project when I’m sure he would have preferred to bash me on the head with a copy of Volume I. I would like to thank my wife Sara, who has lived with me juggling multiple writing projects over many years. She long ago learned what it means when she notices me staring blankly at nothing, and says, “You’re writing in your head again, aren’t you?” Finally, I would like to thank you, good reader, for making the two volumes of Routing T/IP such a success and for waiting so patiently for me to finish this new edition. I hope the book proves to be worth your wait.

viii

Routing T/IP, Volume II

Contents at a Glance Introduction

xxi

Chapter 1

Inter-Domain Routing Concepts 1

Chapter 2

Introduction to BGP 71

Chapter 3

BGP and NLRI 155

Chapter 4

BGP and Routing Policies 237

Chapter 5

Scaling BGP 401

Chapter 6

Multiprotocol BGP 615

Chapter 7

Introduction to IP Multicast Routing 713

Chapter 8

Protocol Independent Multicast 771

Chapter 9

Scaling IP Multicast Routing 881

Chapter 10

IPv4 to IPv4 Network Address Translation (NAT44) 931

Chapter 11

IPv6 to IPv4 Network Address Translation (NAT64) 995

Appendix A

Answers to Review Questions 1047 Index

1079

Appendix B (online) Answers to Configuration Exercises Appendix C (online) Answers to Troubleshooting Exercises

ix

Contents Introduction xxi Chapter 1

Inter-Domain Routing Concepts

1

Early Inter-Domain Routing: The Exterior Gateway Protocol (EGP) 1 Origins of EGP 2 Operation of EGP 3 EGP Topology Issues 3 EGP Functions 5 Neighbor Acquisition Protocol 6 Neighbor Reachability Protocol 8 Network Reachability Protocol 10 Shortcomings of EGP 15 The Advent of BGP 16 BGP Basics 17 Autonomous System Types 21 External and Internal BGP 22 Multihoming

29

Transit AS Multihoming 30 Stub AS Multihoming 31 Multihoming and Routing Policies 36 Multihoming Issues: Load Sharing and Load Balancing 36 Multihoming Issues: Traffic Control 37 Multihoming Issues: Provider-Assigned Addressing 40 Classless Inter-Domain Routing 41 A Summarization Summary 41 Classless Routing 43 Summarization: The Good, the Bad, and the Asymmetric 47 CIDR: Reducing Class B Address Space Depletion 50 CIDR: Reducing Routing Table Explosion 50 Managing and Asg IPv4 Address Blocks 54 CIDR Issues: Multihoming and Provider-Assigned Addresses 56 CIDR Issues: Address Portability 58 CIDR Issues: Provider-Independent Addresses 59 CIDR Issues: Traffic Engineering 60 CIDR Approaches Its Limits 62

x

Routing T/IP, Volume II

IPv6 Comes of Age 66 Routing Table Explosion, Again 66 Looking Ahead 68 Review Questions 69 Chapter 2

Introduction to BGP 71 Who Needs BGP? 71 Connecting to Untrusted Domains 71 Connecting to Multiple External Neighbors 74 Setting Routing Policy 79 BGP Hazards 82 Operation of BGP 84 BGP Message Types 85 Open Message

85

Keepalive Message Update Message

86 86

Notification Message

87

BGP Finite State Machine 87 Idle State

88

Connect State Active State

89 89

OpenSent State

89

OpenConfirm State 90 Established State 90 Path Attributes

90

ORIGIN Attribute

92

AS_PATH Attribute

92

NEXT_HOP Attribute Weight

97

100

BGP Decision Process 100 BGP Message Formats 103 Open Message 104 Update Message 105 Keepalive Message 108 Notification Message 108

xi

Configuring and Troubleshooting BGP Peering 110 Case Study: EBGP Peering 110 Case Study: EBGP Peering over IPv6 114 Case Study: IBGP Peering 118 Case Study: Connected Check and EBGP Multihop 127 Case Study: Managing and Securing BGP Connections 136 Looking Ahead 142 Review Questions 143 Configuration Exercises 144 Troubleshooting Exercises 145 Chapter 3

BGP and NLRI 155 Configuring and Troubleshooting NLRI in BGP 155 Injecting Prefixes with the network Statement 156 Using the network mask Statement 160 Injecting Prefixes with Redistribution

162

NLRI and IBGP 167 Managing Prefixes in an IBGP Topology 168 IBGP and IGP Synchronization 179 Advertising BGP NLRI into the Local AS

182

Redistributing BGP NLRI into the IGP 182 Case Study: Distributing NLRI in a Stub AS with IBGP 184 Distributing NLRI in a Stub AS with Static Routes 193 Advertising a Default Route to a Neighboring AS 196 Advertising Aggregate Routes with BGP 198 Case Study: Aggregation Using Static Routes 199 Aggregation Using the aggregate-address Statement 201 ATOMIC_AGGREGATE and AGGREGATOR Attributes 207 Using AS_SET with Aggregates 210 Looking Ahead 218 Review Questions 218 Configuration Exercises 219 Troubleshooting Exercises 223 Chapter 4

BGP and Routing Policies 237 Policy and the BGP Database 238 IOS BGP Implementation 249 InQ and OutQ 249

xii

Routing T/IP, Volume II

IOS BGP Processes

251

NHT, Event, and the Open Processes Table Versions

258

Managing Policy Changes

267

Clearing BGP Sessions

268

Soft Reconfiguraton Route Refresh

256

269

274

Route Filtering Techniques Filtering Routes by NLRI

279 280

Case Study: Using Distribute Lists

280

Route Filtering with Extended ACLs Case Study: Using Prefix Lists

293

Filtering Routes by AS_PATH

304

Regular Expressions

292

304

Literals and Metacharacters 305 Delineation: Matching the Start and End of Lines 306 Bracketing: Matching a Set of Characters 306 Negating: Matching Everything Except a Set of Characters 306 Wildcard: Matching Any Single Character 307 Alternation: Matching One of a Set of Characters 307 Optional Characters: Matching a Character That May or May Not Be There 307 Repetition: Matching a Number of Repeating Characters 307 Boundaries: Delineating Literals 308 Putting It All Together: A Complex Example 308 Case Study: Using AS-Path Filters 309 Case Study: Setting Policy with Route Maps 314 Filter Processing 322 Influencing the BGP Decision Process 323 Case Study: istrative Weights 325 Case Study: Using the LOCAL_PREF Attribute 334 Case Study: Using the MULTI_EXIT_DISC Attribute 343 Case Study: Prepending the AS_PATH 366 Case Study: istrative Distances and Backdoor Routes 372 Controlling Complex Route Maps 379 Continue Clauses 380 Policy Lists 383

xiii

Looking Ahead 386 Review Questions 386 Configuration Exercises 388 Troubleshooting Exercises 392 Chapter 5

Scaling BGP 401 Scaling the Configuration 402 Peer Groups 403 Peer Templates 413 Session Templates Policy Templates

414 419

Communities 425 Well-Known Communities 426 Arbitrary Communities 434 Using the AA:NN Format 443 Expanded Community Lists 445 Adding and Deleting Communities 460 Extended Community Lists 472 Scaling BGP Functions 478 Route Flap Dampening

479

Outbound Route Filters (ORF) 486 Next-Hop Tracking 496 Fast External Fallover 509 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) 512 BGP Prefix Independent Convergence (PIC) 523 ADD-PATHS Capability 528 Graceful Restart 538 Maximum Prefixes 540 Tuning BGP U 552 Tuning BGP Memory 556 BGP Transport Optimization 563 Optimizing T 563 Optimizing BGP Update Generation 568 Optimizing T ACK Message Receipt 568 Scaling the BGP Network 569 Private AS Numbers

569

4-Byte AS Numbers 574

xiv

Routing T/IP, Volume II

IBGP and the N-Squared Problem 575 Confederations 576 Route Reflectors 592 Looking Ahead

606

Review Questions

607

Configuration Exercises 608 Troubleshooting Exercises 612 Chapter 6

Multiprotocol BGP

615

Multiprotocol Extensions to BGP 616 MBGP for the IPv6 Address Family 618 Configuring MBGP for IPv6 619 IPv4 and IPv6 Prefixes over an IPv4 T Session 620 Upgrading IPv4 BGP Configurations to the Address Family Format 629 IPv4 and IPv6 over an IPv6 T Connection 631 Dual Stack MBGP Connection 642 Multihop Dual Stack MBGP Connection 647 Mixed IPv4 and IPv6 Sessions 650 Multiprotocol IBGP 654 Case Study: Multiprotocol Policy Configuration 666 Looking Ahead 705 Review Questions 705 Configuration Exercises 706 Question 1: 707 Troubleshooting Exercises 709 Chapter 7

Introduction to IP Multicast Routing Requirements for IP Multicast

713

716

IPv4 Multicast Addresses

717

IPv6 Multicast Addresses

721

Group hip Concepts

724

ing and Leaving a Group 726 Latency 726 Leave Latency 727 Group Maintenance 728 Multiple Routers on a Network 728

xv

Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) 729 IGMPv2 Host Functions 730 IGMPv2 Router Functions 731 IGMPv1

733

IGMPv3

735

IGMP Message Format 736 Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD) 742 IGMP/MLD Snooping 745 Cisco Group Management Protocol (CGMP) 749 Multicast Routing Issues 753 Multicast Forwarding 754 Multicast Routing 756 Sparse Versus Dense Topologies 757 Implicit s Versus Explicit s 758 Source-Based Trees Versus Shared Trees 760 Source-Specific Multicast (SSM) 761 Multicast Scoping 763 TTL Scoping

763

istrative Scoping 765 Looking Ahead 766 Recommended Reading 766 Review Questions 766 Configuration Exercises 768 Chapter 8

Protocol Independent Multicast 771 Introduction to Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) 771 Operation of Protocol Independent Multicast-Dense Mode (PIM-DM) 773 PIM-DM Basics 773 Prune Overrides 779 Unicast Route Changes 782 PIM-DM Designated Routers 782 PIM Forwarder Election 782 Operation of Protocol Independent Multicast-Sparse Mode (PIM-SM) 785 PIM-SM Basics 786

xvi

Routing T/IP, Volume II

Finding the Rendezvous Point 787 Bootstrap Protocol 787 Auto-RP Protocol 789 Embedded RP Addresses 790 PIM-SM and Shared Trees 793 Source Registration 796 PIM-SM and Shortest Path Trees 803 PIMv2 Message Formats 808 PIMv2 Message Header Format 809 PIMv2 Hello Message Format 810 PIMv2 Message Format 811 PIMv2 Stop Message Format 812 PIMv2 /Prune Message Format 812 PIMv2 Bootstrap Message Format 814 PIMv2 Assert Message Format 815 PIMv2 Graft Message Format 816 PIMv2 Graft-Ack Message Format 816 Candidate-RP-ment Message Format 817 Configuring IP Multicast Routing

817

Case Study: Configuring Protocol Independent Multicast-Dense Mode (PIM-DM) 819 Configuring Protocol Independent Multicast-Sparse Mode (PIM-SM) 828 Case Study: Statically Configuring the RP 829 Case Study: Configuring Auto-RP 837 Case Study: Configuring Sparse-Dense Mode 845 Case Study: Configuring the Bootstrap Protocol 849 Case Study: Multicast Load Sharing 856 Troubleshooting IP Multicast Routing 863 Using mrinfo 865 Using mtrace and mstat 867 Looking Ahead 872 Recommended Reading 872 Review Questions 873 Configuration Exercises 873 Troubleshooting Exercises 876

xvii

Chapter 9

Scaling IP Multicast Routing

881

Multicast Scoping 881 Case Study: Multicasting Across Non-Multicast Domains 885 Connecting to DVMRP Networks 888 Inter-AS Multicasting

891

Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP (MBGP)

894

Operation of Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP) 896 MSDP Message Formats 898 Source Active TLV 898 Source Active Request TLV 899 Source Active Response TLV 900 Keepalive TLV 900 Notification TLV 900 Case Study: Configuring MBGP 902 Case Study: Configuring MSDP 908 Case Study: MSDP Mesh Groups 913 Case Study: Anycast RP 917 Case Study: MSDP Default Peers 923 Looking Ahead 926 Review Questions 926 Configuration Exercise 927 Chapter 10

IPv4 to IPv4 Network Address Translation (NAT44) 931 Operation of NAT44 932 Basic NAT Concepts 932 NAT and IP Address Conservation 934 NAT and ISP Migration 937 NAT and Multihomed Autonomous Systems 938 Port Address Translation (PAT) 940 NAT and T Load Distribution 942 NAT and Virtual Servers 944 NAT Issues 944 Header Checksums 945 Fragmentation 945 Encryption 945 Security 946

xviii

Routing T/IP, Volume II

Protocol-Specific Issues 946 ICMP

947

DNS FTP

948 951

SMTP

953

SNMP

953

Routing Protocols 953 Traceroute 953 Configuring NAT44 955 Case Study: Static NAT 955 NAT44 and DNS 962 Case Study: Dynamic NAT 964 Case Study: A Network Merger 969 Case Study: ISP Multihoming with NAT 975 Port Address Translation 980 Case Study: T Load Balancing 982 Case Study: Service Distribution 984 Troubleshooting NAT44 986 Looking Ahead 988 Review Questions 989 Configuration Exercises 989 Troubleshooting Exercises 991 Chapter 11

IPv6 to IPv4 Network Address Translation (NAT64) 995 Stateless IP/ICMP Translation (SIIT) 997 IPv4/IPv6 Header Translation 999 ICMP/ICMPv6 Translation 1002 Fragmentation and PMTU

1005

Upper-Layer Header Translation 1006 Network Address Translation with Port Translation (NAT-PT) 1007 Operation of NAT-PT 1008 Configuring NAT-PT 1010 Why Is NAT-PT Obsolete? 1029 Stateless NAT64 1031 Operation of Stateless NAT64 1031 Configuration of Stateless NAT64 1036 Limitations of NAT64 1038

xix

Stateful NAT64 1038 Operation of Stateful NAT64 1038 Configuration of Stateful NAT64 1041 Limitations of Stateful NAT64 1043 Looking Ahead 1043 Review Questions 1044 Configuration Exercise 1044 Configuration Exercise Premise 1045 Appendix A

Answers to Review Questions 1047 Index 1079

Appendix B (online) Answers to Configuration Exercises Appendix C (online) Answers to Troubleshooting Exercises

xx

Routing T/IP, Volume II

Command Syntax Conventions The conventions used to present command syntax in this book are the same conventions used in the IOS Command Reference. The Command Reference describes these conventions as follows: ■

Boldface indicates commands and keywords that are entered literally as shown. In actual configuration examples and output (not general command syntax), boldface indicates commands that are manually input by the (such as a show command).

■

Italic indicates arguments for which you supply actual values.

■

Vertical bars (|) separate alternative, mutually exclusive elements.

■

Square brackets ([ ]) indicate an optional element.

■

Braces ({ }) indicate a required choice.

■

Braces within brackets ([{ }]) indicate a required choice within an optional element.

xxi

Introduction Since the publication of Volume I of Routing T/IP, many volumes have been added to the Cisco Press CCIE Professional Development series. And the CCIE program has expanded to include various areas of specialization. Yet the IP routing protocols remain the essential foundation on which CCIE candidates must build their expertise. If the foundation is weak, the house will tumble. I stated in the introduction to Volume I that “…as internetworks grow in size and complexity, routing issues can become at once both large and subtle.” Scalability and management of growth continues to be a central theme in this second volume, as we move beyond the interior gateway protocols to examine both inter-autonomous system routing and more exotic routing issues such as multicasting and IPv6. My objective in this book is not only to help you walk away from the CCIE lab exam with one of those valued and valuable numbers after your name, but also to help you develop the knowledge and skills to live up to the CCIE title. As with the first volume, I want to make CCIEs, not people who can the CCIE lab. In this vein, you can find in this book more information than you need to the lab, but certainly all the material is important in your career as a recognized internetworking expert. When I earned my CCIE, the lab still consisted mostly of AGS+ routers. Certainly, the lab and the nature of the exam has changed substantially since that ancient time. If anything, the lab is more difficult now. Another addition to the CCIE program has been the recertification requirement. Even before I took the recertification exam for the first time, people told me how much Volume I helped them prepare for the test—particularly for IS-IS, a protocol that few outside of service provider environments are exposed to. I have therefore written this second volume with not only CCIE candidates in mind, but also existing CCIEs who need to review for their recertification. The chapters on multicasting and IPv6 are directed to this audience. I have endeavored to follow the same structure that I followed in Volume I, in which a protocol is introduced in generic , followed by examples of configuring the protocol using Cisco IOS, and finally by examples of IOS tools for troubleshooting the protocol. For BGP and IP multicast, this structure is far too lengthy for a single chapter and therefore spans multiple chapters. I hope you learn as much from reading this book as I have writing it.

Introduction to the Second Edition Almost from the moment the first edition of this volume went to print in 2001, I’ve wanted to add to it and, in some cases, change it. Some of that motivation came from my growing experience. Between 1998 and 2010, I worked almost exclusively with service providers and carriers, and I learned something new with almost every design project, technical discussion, and seminar I led or participated in. Certainly, some of this new knowledge just filled gaps in my own experience, but not all of it. I also learned along

xxii

Routing T/IP, Volume II

with the rest of the networking industry as BGP and multicast networks became more sophisticated, as new capabilities were added, and as best practices evolved.

What’s Changed in the Industry? The following sections outline what has changed in the industry since the first edition of this book was published.

BGP All the core concepts of BGP were already around when the first edition of this book was released in 2001. It was the external gateway protocol—or inter-autonomous system routing protocol— used throughout the Internet. It had multiprotocol capabilities. Version 4 was the accepted version. Although a number of useful new features and capabilities have been added since then, the protocol itself actually hasn’t changed that much. What has changed is the industry experience with BGP. This has enhanced the way policies are used and has enhanced and in some cases changed accepted best practices. And multiprotocol BGP has become the workhorse of multiservice core networks, with quite a few new address families defined so that you can run a multitude of different services over a single shared core. I don’t cover the other essential element of multiservice networks in this book—Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS)—because the subject can easily fill one or two volumes by itself. But you can learn enough about multiprotocol BGP here to understand how it s the various MPLS-based address families. And you see plenty of examples in this book of multiprotocol BGP for both unicast and multicast address families under both IPv4 and IPv6. The first edition of this book had a chapter on EGP, the predecessor to BGP. Although obsolete even then, the protocol still existed in some obscure government networks. So I covered it both for that reason and just in case some devious lab proctor decided to throw a few EGP problems at you on the CCIE exam. The protocol is now most sincerely dead and is covered in this edition only from a historical context to introduce BGP. Reflecting the expanded industry experience of BGP and many new features Cisco added to its , the two chapters on BGP in the first edition is now six chapters in this edition.

IP Multicast IP multicast networking has probably changed more than BGP networking has. Multicast and the associated routing protocols were complicated, and the networks were difficult to manage in 2001. To some degree that is still true, but also some changes make it not quite so difficult. In 2001, the most common multicast routing protocols were DVMRP, PIM-DM, and PIM-SM. But I suspected that Core-Based Trees (CBT) and Multiprotocol OSPF

xxiii

(MOSPF) might become mainstream, so I covered those protocols. However, CBT and MOSPF never found acceptance, and DVMRP has become the RIP of multicast routing protocol—obsolete but still encountered on rare occasions. As a result, CBT and MOSPF are dropped from this edition in all but ing mention, and DVMRP is covered in much less detail than it was in the first edition. PIM is now the accepted multicast routing protocol for both IPv4 and IPv6, so PIM-DM and PIM-SM, along with PIM-SSM, are covered in more depth than they were in the first edition.

IPv6 I have been advocating IPv6 since the late 1990s; although by 2001, most interest in this new version of IP was limited to Japan, the People’s Republic of China, and the Republic of Korea. Little interest was shown in the United States or Europe outside of a few military circles. IPv6 was for the most part out in the unforeseen future. Anyone predicting that the public IPv4 address pools would begin being depleted as soon as 2012 was considered a Chicken Little and probably more than a little ridiculous. So the first edition included a standalone chapter on IPv6 with little relation to the other topics in the book. What a difference 15 years have made. IPv6 is now a mainstream protocol, and I predict that in not too many more years it will displace the now depleted IPv4. Reflecting this new reality, there is no standalone IPv6 chapter in this edition. Instead, IPv6 is discussed in the context of BGP and IP multicast. Network address translation in 2001 meant NAT-PT and always translation only between different IPv4 addresses. The technology has expanded since then, so now two chapters are included on NAT: one on IPv4-to-IPv4 translation and one on IPv6-to-IPv4 translation (NAT64).

What’s Changed in This Edition? The last chapter difference you’ll find in this second edition is the elimination of the first-edition chapter on router management (Chapter 9 in the first edition). The subject of managing Cisco routers has expanded greatly since 2001, as have the number of routing platforms Cisco offers, and doing the topic justice would take more room than appropriate for this book. In addition, the book is titled Routing T/IP after all, not Managing Cisco Routers. Following are other changes in this edition: ■

IOS: IOS was the only Cisco router operating system in 2001. Now, in addition to IOS, we have IOS-XR, IOS-XE, and NX-OS. Trying to cover configuration examples and exercises under all these different systems would be confusing and complex, and would distract from the primary goal of the two volumes of Routing T/IP, which is to teach the protocols. So you’ll find only IOS in this book. If

xxiv

Routing T/IP, Volume II

you understand the topics covered here, you can easily make the jump to any of the other Cisco operating systems. ■

Cisco versus IOS: Related to the previous bullet, in the first edition, I usually referred to “Cisco commands.” Because of the multiple operating systems Cisco now offers, I try to be more specific in this edition and say “IOS commands.”

■

Commands versus statements: Again related to the previous bullet, I have endeavored in this edition to differentiate between an IOS command and an IOS statement. A command, in this edition, means something you enter and expect to get an immediate result, such as a show command. A statement, however, is a part of an IOS configuration that influences the router’s operational state.

■

Command Reference: The first edition included a tabular listing at the end of each chapter of the commands (and statements) covered in the chapter in their full syntax with a description of each. So many commands (and statements) are covered now, and in some cases with so many variations among different IOS versions, that the table became long and unwieldy. So there is no end-of-chapter Command Reference here. If you want the full syntax of a command (or…ahem…statement) you can easily look it up in the online Cisco Command Reference Guide for the IOS version you use. And speaking of versions….

■

IOS versions: I used IOS 11.4 for most of the examples in the first edition. As you surely know, there have been many IOS releases since then. In a few cases, I have reused some outputs from the first edition, but in most cases I have used more recent 12.4 or 15.0. In all cases, I have ensured that the captured configurations or outputs include the information discussed; however, your outputs might look different in some cases depending on the version you use. You should focus on finding the relevant information in an output, not on whether it looks exactly the same as what I show you.

■

Integrated troubleshooting: In Volume I of Routing T/IP, each chapter followed a set format of providing a generic technical overview of the chapter subject, a section on how to configure it in IOS, and then a section on troubleshooting it. The BGP and IP multicast chapters in this second volume are each complicated enough and cover so much ground that the better approach is to integrate troubleshooting examples into the general configuration examples.

■

Network versus internetwork: This is a trivial change. In 2001, I tried to be precise in my definitions, so a network meant a common communications media such as Ethernet, whereas an internetwork was any number of networks connected by routers. That’s now old-fashioned usage. Hardly anyone says internetwork any more, except in a few precise cases. As a result, I’ve tried to kill the word off in this edition. Subnet has a more logical and address-related meaning than shared communications medium, and network is understood from the context in which the word is used. So network might mean anything from two routers connected by a serial or Ethernet link to a massive inter-AS system such as the Internet. It might be less

xxv

precise, but it’s what people use in everyday router-nerd conversations. Speaking of trivial changes…. ■

Those weird zig-zag serial link icons: Serial links have been represented with a zig-zag or “lightning-shaped” line since before I was teaching Cisco classes in the early 1990s. There was a reason for the distinction because serial links behaved differently than LAN links. But in the examples throughout this volume, the link type is irrelevant to the example. And I’ve found that the zig-zag icon often clutters an illustration. So I’ve tried to eliminate those icons throughout this book and just use a straight link for a connection between interfaces, regardless of what kind of connection it is.

Answers to Configuration and Troubleshooting Exercises There are two appendixes you will need to to review the answers to the configuration and troubleshooting exercises: Appendix B, “Answers to Configuration Exercises,” and Appendix C, “Answers to Troubleshooting Exercises.” You can find these appendixes online by ing your book at www.ciscopress.com/ . Simply to the site, enter the book ISBN on this page (9781587054709), and answer the security question presented to the book. Once the book is ed, you will be able to the files by going to your page, opening the ed Products tab, and selecting the Access Bonus Content link.

This page intentionally left blank

Chapter 2

Introduction to BGP

Now that you have a firm understanding of the key issues surrounding inter-domain routing from Chapter 1, “Inter-Domain Routing Concepts,” it is time to begin tackling BGP. This chapter covers the basic operation of BGP, including its message types, how the messages are used, and the format of the messages. You also learn about the various basic attributes BGP can associate with a route and how it uses these attributes to choose a best path. Finally, this chapter shows you how to configure and troubleshoot BGP peering sessions.

Who Needs BGP? If you answer “yes” to all four of the following questions, you need BGP: ■

Are you connecting to another routing domain?

■

Are you connecting to a domain under a separate istrative authority?

■

Is your domain multihomed?

■

Is a routing policy required?

The answer to the first question—are you connecting to another routing domain?— is obvious; BGP is an inter-domain routing protocol. But as the subsequent sections explain, BGP is not the only means of routing between separate domains.

Connecting to Untrusted Domains An underlying assumption of an IGP is that, by definition, its neighbors are all under the same istrative authority, and therefore the neighbors can be trusted: Trusted to not be malicious, trusted to be correctly configured, and trusted to not send bad route information. All these things can still happen occasionally within an IGP domain, but they are

72

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

rare. An IGP is designed to freely exchange route information, focusing more on performance and easy configuration than on tight control of the information. BGP, however, is designed to connect to neighbors in domains out of the control of its own istration. Those neighbors cannot be trusted, and the information you exchange with those neighbors is (if BGP is configured properly) carefully controlled with route policies. But if connection to an external domain is your only requirement—particularly if there is only one connection—BGP is probably not called for. Static routes serve you better in this case; you don’t have to worry about false information being exchanged because no information at all is being exchanged. Static routes are the ultimate means of controlling what packets are routed into and out of your network. Figure 2-1 shows a subscriber attached by a single connection to an ISP. BGP, or any other type of routing protocol, is unnecessary in this topology. If the single link fails, no routing decision needs to be made because no alternative route exists. A routing protocol accomplishes nothing. In this topology, the subscriber adds a static default route to the border router and redistributes the route into his AS.

ISP

205.110.32.0/20

0.0.0.0/0

Subscriber 205.110.32.0/20 Figure 2-1

Static Routes Are All That Is Needed in This Single-Homed Topology

The ISP similarly adds a static route pointing to the subscriber’s address range and s that route into its AS. Of course, if the subscriber’s address space is a part of the ISP’s larger address space, the route d by the ISP’s router goes no farther than the ISP’s own AS. “The rest of the world” can reach the subscriber by routing to the ISP’s d address space, and the more-specific route to the subscriber can be picked up only within the ISP’s AS.

Who Needs BGP?

An important principle to when working with inter-AS traffic is that each physical link actually represents two logical links: one for incoming traffic, and one for outgoing traffic, as shown in Figure 2-2.

Ou tgo traf ing fic

Inc om traf ing fic

ISP

Subscriber Figure 2-2 Each Physical Link Between Autonomous Systems Represents Two Logical Links, Carrying Incoming and Outgoing Packets The routes you in each direction influence the traffic separately. Avi Freedman, who has written many excellent articles on ISP issues, calls a route ment a promise to carry packets to the address space represented in the route. In Figure 2-1, the subscriber’s router is advertising a default route into the local AS—a promise to deliver packets to any destination. And the ISP’s router, advertising a route to 205.110.32.0/20, promises to deliver traffic to the subscriber’s AS. The outgoing traffic from the subscriber’s AS is the result of the default route, and the incoming traffic to the subscriber’s AS is the result of the route d by the ISP’s router. This concept may seem trivial and obvious at this point, but it is important to keep in mind as more complex topologies are examined and as we begin establishing policies for d and accepted routes. The vulnerability of the topology in Figure 2-1 is that the entire connection consists of single points of failure. If the single data link fails, if a router or one of its interfaces fails, if the configuration of one of the routers fails, if a process within the router fails, or if one of the routers’ all-too-human s makes a mistake, the subscriber’s entire Internet connectivity can be lost. What is lacking in this picture is redundancy.

73

74

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

Connecting to Multiple External Neighbors Figure 2-3 shows an improved topology, with redundant links to the same provider. How the incoming and outgoing traffic is manipulated across these links depends upon how the two links are used. For example, a frequent setup when multihoming to a single provider is for one of the links to be a primary, dedicated Internet access link and for the other link to be used only for backup.

Figure 2-3 When Multihoming You Must Consider the Incoming and Outgoing ments and Resulting Traffic on Each Link When the redundant link is used only for backup, there is again no call for BGP. The routes can be d just as they were in the single-homed scenario, except that the routes associated with the backup link have the metrics set high so that they can be used only if the primary link fails. Example 2-1 shows what the configurations of the routers carrying the primary and secondary links might look like. Example 2-1 Primary and Secondary Link Configurations for Multihoming to a Single Autonomous System Primary Router: router ospf 100 network 205.110.32.0 0.0.15.255 area 0 default-information originate metric 10 !

Who Needs BGP?

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 205.110.168.108 ____________________________________________ Backup Router: router ospf 100 network 205.110.32.0 0.0.15.255 area 0 default-information originate metric 100 ! ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 205.110.168.113 150

In this configuration, the backup router has a default route whose istrative distance is set to 150 so that it will be only in the routing table if the default route from the primary router is unavailable. Also, the backup default is d with a higher metric than the primary default route to ensure that the other routers in the OSPF domain prefer the primary default route. The OSPF metric type of both routes is E2, so the d metrics remain the same throughout the OSPF domain. This ensures that the metric of the primary default route remains lower than the metric of the backup default route in every router, regardless of the internal cost to each border router. Example 2-2 shows the default routes in a router internal to the subscriber’s OPSF domain. Example 2-2 The First Display Shows the Primary External Route; the Second Display Shows the Backup Route Being Used After the Primary Route Has Failed Phoenix#show ip route 0.0.0.0 Routing entry for 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0, supernet Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 10, candidate default path Tag 1, type extern 2, forward metric 64 Redistributing via ospf 1 Last update from 205.110.36.1 on Serial0, 00:01:24 ago Routing Descriptor Blocks: * 205.110.36.1, from 205.110.36.1, 00:01:24 ago, via Serial0 Route metric is 10, traffic share count is 1 ______________________________________________________________________ Phoenix#show ip route 0.0.0.0 Routing entry for 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0, supernet Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 100, candidate default path Tag 1, type extern 2, forward metric 64 Redistributing via ospf 1 Last update from 205.110.38.1 on Serial1, 00:00:15 ago Routing Descriptor Blocks: * 205.110.38.1, from 205.110.38.1, 00:00:15 ago, via Serial1 Route metric is 100, traffic share count is 1

75

76

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

Although a primary/backup design satisfies the need for redundancy, it does not efficiently use the available bandwidth. A better design would be to use both paths, with each providing backup for the other if a link or router failure occurs. In this case, the configuration used in both routers is indicated in Example 2-3. Example 2-3 When Load Sharing to the Same AS, the Configuration of Both Routers Can Be the Same router ospf 100 network 205.110.32.0 0.0.15.255 area 0 default-information originate metric 10 metric-type 1 ! ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 205.110.168.108

Note A key difference between building the simple peering of Figure 2-3 as a primary/ backup configuration and as a load-sharing configuration is the consideration of bandwidth. If one link is a primary and one is a backup, the bandwidth of both links should be equal; if the primary fails, the load can be fully rerouted to the backup with no congestion. In some configurations, the backup link has considerably lower bandwidth, under the assumption that if the primary fails, the backup provides only enough bandwidth for critical applications to survive rather than full network functionality. When a load-sharing configuration is used, the bandwidth of each of the two links should carry the total traffic load normally carried over both links. If one of the links fails, the other can then carry the full traffic load without packet loss. The static routes in both routers have equal istrative distances, and the default routes are d with equal metrics (10). The default routes are now d with an OSPF metric type of E1. With this metric type, each of the routers in the OSPF domain takes into the internal cost of the route to the border routers in addition to the cost of the default routes. As a result, every router chooses the closest exit point when choosing a default route, as shown by Figure 2-4. In most cases advertising default routes into the AS from multiple exit points, and summarizing address space out of the AS at the same exit points, is sufficient for good internetwork performance. The one consideration is whether asymmetric traffic patterns will become a concern, as discussed in Chapter 1. If the geographical separation between the two (or more) exit points is large enough for delay variations to become significant, you might have a need for better control of the routing. BGP may now be a consideration. For example, suppose the two exit routers in Figure 2-3 are located in Los Angeles and London. You might want all your exit traffic destined for the Eastern Hemisphere to use the London router, and all your exit traffic for the Western Hemisphere to use the Los Angeles router. that the incoming route ments influence your

Who Needs BGP?

outgoing traffic. If the provider s routes into your AS via BGP, your internal routers has more accurate information about external destinations.

0.0.0.0/0 Cost = 10 Type = E1

0.0.0.0/0 Cost = 10 Type = E1

10

10

20

10

10

20

64

10 20

64

Preferred Route

Figure 2-4 The OSPF Border Routers a Default Route with a Metric of 10 and an OPSF Metric Type of E1 Similarly, outgoing route ments influence your incoming traffic. If internal routes are d to the provider via BGP, you have influence over what routes are d at what exit point, and also tools for influencing (to some degree) the choices the provider makes when sending traffic into your AS. When considering whether to use BGP, weigh the benefits gained against the cost of added routing complexity. BGP should be preferred over static routes only when an advantage in traffic control can be realized. Consider the incoming and outgoing traffic separately. If it is only important to control your incoming traffic, use BGP to routes to your provider while still advertising only a default route into your AS. However, if it is only important to control your outgoing traffic, use BGP just to receive routes from your provider. Consider the ramifications of accepting routes from your provider. “Taking full BGP routes” means that your provider s to you the entire Internet routing table. As of this writing, that is more than 500,000 IPv4 route entries,

77

78

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

as shown in Example 2-4. The IPv6 Internet table is growing rapidly. You need a reasonably powerful router U to process the routes and enough router memory to store the entries. You also need sufficient TCAM or other forwarding plane memory to hold forwarding information. Example 2-4 shows that just the BGP routes require almost 155.7MB; the memory that BGP requires to process these routes, as shown in Example 2-5, is approximately 4.1GB. A simple default-routing scheme, however, can be implemented easily with a low-end router and a moderate amount of memory. Example 2-4 BGP Entries 1

This Summary of the Full Internet Routing Table Shows 540,809

route-views>show ip route summary IP routing table name is default (0x0) IP routing table maximum-paths is 32 Route Source

Networks

Subnets

Replicates

Overhead

Memory (bytes)

connected

0

2

0

192

576

static

1

57

0

5568

16704

application

0

0

0

0

0

bgp 6447

174172

366637

0

51917664

155752992

0

51923424

External: 540809 Internal: 0 Local: 0 internal

7847

Total

182020

42922856 366696

198693128

route-views>

Example 2-5 BGP Requires Approximately 4.1GB of Memory to Process the Routes Shown in Example 2-4 route-views> show processes memory | include BGP 117

0

0

232

41864

644

176

0 1505234352

262528

370120

14362638

299

0

0

10068312

41864

0

314

0

0

0

29864

0

0 BGP HA SSO

338

0 27589889144 2170064712 4102896864

3946

3946 BGP Router

350

0

0

0

29864

0

0 XC BGP SIG RIB H

383

0

0

0

41864

0

0 BGP Consistency

415

0

0

0

41864

0

0 BGP Event

445

0

0

0

29864

0

0 BGP VA

450

0

3224

0

33160

1

0 BGP Open

562

0

328104

262528

107440

0

0 BGP Task

574

0

3248

0

33160

1

0 BGP Open

1

644 BGP Scheduler 14362638 BGP I/O 0 BGP Scanner

This display was taken in 2014 from the public route server at University of Oregon (AS6447). The corresponding example in the first edition of this book, taken from an AT&T route server in 1999, showed 88,269 BGP entries.

Who Needs BGP?

575

0

3120

0

33088

1

0 BGP Open

577

0

3120

0

33040

1

0 BGP Open

578

0

3120

0

33072

1

0 BGP Open

route-views>

Note The routing table summary in Example 2-4 and the related processes shown in Example 2-5 are taken from a route server at route-views.oregon-ix.net. By the time you read this chapter, the numbers shown in these two examples will have changed; telnet to the server, and see what they are now. There are a number of such publicly accessible route servers; for a good list, go to www.netdigix.com/servers.html.

Another consideration is that when running BGP, a subscriber’s routing domain must be identified with an autonomous system (AS) number. Like IPv4 addresses, AS numbers are limited and are assigned only by the regional address registries when there is a justifiable need. And like IPv4 addresses, a range of AS numbers is reserved for private use: the AS numbers 64512 to 65534. As with private IPv4 addresses (RFC 1918), these AS numbers are not globally unique and must not be included in the AS_PATH of any route d into the public Internet. With few exceptions, subscribers that are connected to a single service provider (either single or multihomed) use an AS number out of the reserved range. The service provider filters the private AS number out of the d BGP path. Configuring and filtering private AS numbers is covered in Chapter 5, “Scaling BGP.” Although the topology in Figure 2-3 is an improvement over the topology in Figure 2-2 because redundant routers and data links have been added, it still entails a single point of failure. That point of failure is the ISP. If the ISP loses connectivity to the rest of the Internet, so does the subscriber. And if the ISP suffers a major internal outage, the single-homed subscriber also suffers.

Setting Routing Policy Figure 2-5 shows a topology in which a subscriber has homed to more than one service provider. In addition to the advantages of multihoming already described, this subscriber is protected from losing Internet connectivity as the result of a single ISP failure. And with this topology BGP begins to become a better choice, in most cases, than static routes. The subscriber in Figure 2-5 could still forego BGP. One option is to use one ISP as a primary Internet connection and the other as a backup only; another option is to default route to both providers and let the routing chips fall where they may. But if a subscriber has gone to the expense of multihoming and contracting with multiple providers, neither of these solutions is likely to be acceptable. BGP is the preferred option in this scenario.

79

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

Internet

ISP1

ing Outgo traffic

ing Incom traffic

Ou tg tra oing ffic

ISP2

Inc om tra ing ffic

80

Subscriber

Figure 2-5

Multihoming to Multiple Autonomous Systems

Again, incoming and outgoing traffic should be considered separately. For incoming traffic, the most reliability is realized if all internal routes are d to both providers. This setup ensures that all destinations within the subscriber’s AS are completely reachable via either ISP. Even though both providers are advertising the same routes, there are cases in which incoming traffic should prefer one path over another; such situations are discussed in the multihoming sections of Chapter 1. BGP provides the tools for communicating these preferences. For outgoing traffic, the routes accepted from the providers should be carefully considered. If full routes are accepted from both providers, the best route for every Internet destination is chosen. In some cases, however, one provider might be preferred for full Internet connectivity, whereas the other provider is preferred for only some destinations. In this case, full routes can be taken from the preferred provider and partial routes can be taken from the other provider. For example, you might want to use the secondary provider only to reach its other subscribers and for backup to your primary Internet provider (see Figure 2-6). The secondary provider sends its customer routes, and the subscriber configures a default route to the secondary ISP to be used if the connection to the primary ISP fails. The full routes sent by ISP1 probably include the customer routes of ISP2, learned from the Internet or perhaps from a direct peering connection. Because the same routes are received from ISP2, however, the subscriber’s routers normally prefer the shorter path through ISP2. If the link to ISP2 fails, the subscriber uses the longer paths through ISP1 and the rest of the Internet to reach ISP2’s customers.

Who Needs BGP?

Internet ISP2 customer

ISP1

ISP2

ISP2 routes + Default

Full routes

Subscriber

ISP2 customer

ISP2 customer

ISP2 customer

Figure 2-6 ISP1 Is the Preferred Provider for Most Internet Connectivity; ISP2 Is Used Only to Reach Its Other Customers’ Networks and for Backup Internet Connectivity Similarly, the subscriber normally uses ISP1 to reach all destinations other than ISP2’s customers. If some or all of those more-specific routes from ISP1 are lost, however, the subscriber uses the default route through ISP2. If router U and memory limitations prohibit taking full routes,2 partial routes from both providers are an option. Each provider might send its own customer routes, and the subscriber points default routes to both providers. In this scenario, some routing accuracy is traded for a savings in router resources. In yet another partial-routes scenario, each ISP might send its customer routes and also the customer routes of its upstream provider (which typically is a national or global backbone carrier such as Level 3 Communications, Sprint, NTT, or Deutsche Telekom). In Figure 2-7, for example, ISP1 is connected to Carrier1, and ISP2 is connected to Carrier2. The partial routes sent to the subscriber by ISP1 consist of all ISP1’s customer routes and all Carrier1’s customer routes. The partial routes sent by ISP2 consist of all ISP2’s customer routes and all Carrier2’s customer routes. The subscriber points to default routes at both providers. Because of the size of the two backbone carrier providers, the subscriber has enough routes to make efficient routing decisions on a large number of destinations. At the same time, the partial routes are still significantly smaller than a full Internet routing table.

2

Taking full BGP routes from two sources doubles the number of BGP entries in all routers and consequently doubles the memory demand.

81

82

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

Internet

Carrier 1

Carrier 2 IXP

ISP 1

ISP 1 Routes + Carrier 1 Routes + Default

ISP 2 Routes + Carrier 2 Routes + Default

ISP 2

Subscriber

Figure 2-7 The Subscriber Is Taking Partial Routes from Both ISPs, Consisting of All ISP’s Customer Routes and the Customer Routes from Their Respective Upstream Providers All the examples here have shown a stub AS connected to one or more ISPs. Figures 2-5 through 2-7 begin introducing enough complexity that BGP and routing policy are probably called for. As the complexity of multihoming and its related policy issues grow, as illustrated in the transit AS examples in the previous chapter, the need for BGP becomes increasingly sure.

BGP Hazards Creating a BGP peering relationship involves an interesting combination of trust and mistrust. The BGP peer is in another AS, so you must trust the network on that end to know what she is doing. At the same time, if you are smart, you will take every practical measure to protect yourself if a mistake is made on the other end. When you implement a BGP peering connection, paranoia is your friend. At the same time, you should be a good neighbor by taking practical measures to ensure that a mistake in your AS does not affect your BGP peers. Recall the earlier description of a route ment as a promise to deliver packets to the d destination. The routes you directly influence the packets you receive, and the routes you receive directly influence the packets you transmit. In a good

Who Needs BGP?

BGP peering arrangement, both parties should have a complete understanding of what routes are to be d in each direction. Again, incoming and outgoing traffic must be considered separately. Each peer should ensure that he is transmitting only the correct routes and should use route filters or other policy tools such as AS_PATH filters, described in Chapter 4, “BGP and Routing Policies,” to ensure that he receives only the correct routes. Your ISP might show little patience with you if you make mistakes in your BGP configuration, but the worst problems can be attributed to a failure on both sides of the peering arrangement. Suppose, for example, that through some misconfiguration you 207.46.0.0/16 to your ISP. On the receiving side, the ISP does not filter out this incorrect route, allowing it to be d to the rest of the Internet. This particular CIDR block belongs to Microsoft, and you have just claimed to have a route to that destination. A significant portion of the Internet community could decide that the best path to Microsoft is through your domain. You will receive a flood of unwanted packets across your Internet connection and, more important, you will have black-holed traffic that should have gone to Microsoft. It will be neither amused nor understanding. This kind of thing happens frequently: Not long ago, Yahoo experienced a brief outage due to a company in Seoul mistakenly advertising a /14 prefix that included addresses belonging to Yahoo. Figure 2-8 shows another example of a BGP routing mistake. This same internetwork was shown in Figure 2-6, but here the customer routes that the subscriber learned from ISP2 have been inadvertently d to ISP1.

Internet ISP2 customer

ISP1

Full routes

ISP2

ISP2 routes

Subscriber

ISP2 routes + Default

ISP2 customer

ISP2 customer

ISP2 customer

Figure 2-8 This Subscriber Is Advertising Routes Learned from ISP2 into ISP1, Inviting Packets Destined for ISP2 and Its Customers to Transit His Domain

83

84

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

Unless ISP1 and ISP2 have a direct peering connection, ISP1 and its customers probably see the subscriber’s domain as the best path to ISP2 and its customers. In this case, the traffic is not black-holed because the subscriber does indeed have a route to ISP2. The subscriber has become a transit domain for packets from ISP1 to ISP2, to the detriment of its own traffic. And because the routes from ISP2 to ISP1 still point through the Internet, the subscriber has caused asymmetric routing for ISP2. The point of this section is that BGP, by its nature, is designed to allow communication between autonomously controlled systems. A successful and reliable BGP peering arrangement requires an in-depth understanding of not only the routes to be d in each direction, but also the routing policies of each of the involved parties. The remainder of this chapter introduces the technical basics of BGP and demonstrates how to configure and troubleshoot simple BGP sessions. With that foundation experience, you then get a good taste of configuring and troubleshooting policies in Chapter 4.

Operation of BGP The section “BGP Basics” in Chapter 1 introduced you to the fundamental facts about BGP. To recap ■

Unique among the common IP routing protocols, BGP sends only unicast messages and forms a separate point-to-point connection with each of its peers.

■

BGP is an application layer protocol using T (port 179) for this point-to-point connection and relies on the inherent properties of T for session maintenance functions such as acknowledgment, retransmission, and sequencing.

■

BGP is a vector protocol, although called a path vector rather than distance vector because it sees the route to a destination as a path through a series of autonomous systems rather than as a series of routers hops.

■

A BGP route describes the path vector using a route attribute called the AS_PATH, which sequentially lists the autonomous system numbers comprising the path to the destination.

■

The AS_PATH attribute is a shortest path determinant. Given multiple routes to the same destination, the route with an AS_PATH listing the fewest AS numbers is assumed to be the shortest path.

■

The AS numbers on the AS_PATH list are used for loop detection; a router receiving a BGP route with its own AS number in the AS_PATH assumes a loop and discards the route.

■

If a router has a BGP session to a neighbor with a different AS number, the session is called external BGP (EBGP); if the neighbor has the same AS number as the router, the session is called internal BGP (IBGP). The neighbors are called, respectively, external or internal neighbors.

This chapter builds on these basic facts to describe the operation of BGP.

Operation of BGP

BGP Message Types Before establishing a BGP peer connection, the two neighbors must perform the standard T three-way handshake and open a T connection to port 179. T provides the fragmentation, retransmission, acknowledgment, and sequencing functions necessary for a reliable connection, relieving BGP of those duties. All BGP messages are unicast to the one neighbor over the T connection. BGP uses four basic message types: ■

Open

■

Keepalive

■

Update

■

Notification

Note There is a fifth BGP message type: Route Refresh. But unlike the four presented here, this fifth message type is not a part of basic BGP functionality and might not be ed by all BGP routers. The Route Refresh message and its use are described in Chapter 4.

This section describes how these messages are used; for a complete description of the message formats and the variables of each message field, see the section “BGP Message Formats.”

Open Message After the T session is established, both neighbors send Open messages. Each neighbor uses this message to identify itself and to specify its BGP operational parameters. The Open message includes the following information: ■

BGP version number: This specifies the version (2, 3, or 4) of BGP that the originator is running; the IOS default is BGP-4. Prior to IOS 12.0(6)T, IOS would autonegotiate the version: If a neighbor is running an earlier version of BGP, it rejects the Open message specifying version 4; the BGP-4 router then changes to BGP-3 and sends another Open message specifying this version. If the neighbor rejects that message, an Open specifying version 2 is sent. BGP-4 has now become so prevalent that as of 12.0(6)T IOS no longer autonegotiates, but you can still configure a session to speak to a neighbor running version 2 or 3 with neighbor version.

■

Autonomous system number: This is the AS number of the originating router. It determines whether the BGP session is EBGP (if the AS numbers of the neighbors differ) or IBGP (if the AS numbers are the same).

85

86

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

■

Hold time: This is the maximum number of seconds that can elapse before the router must receive either a Keepalive or an Update message. The hold time must be either 0 seconds (in which case, keepalives must not be sent) or at least 3 seconds; the default IOS hold time is 180 seconds. If the neighbors’ hold times differ, the smaller of the two times becomes the accepted hold time. The default hold time can be changed for the entire BGP process with the configuration statement timers bgp or for a specific neighbor or peer group with neighbor timers.

■

BGP identifier: This is an IPv4 address that identifies the neighbor. IOS determines the BGP Identifier in exactly the same way as it determines the OSPF router ID: The numerically highest loopback address is used; if no loopback interface is configured with an IP address, the numerically highest IP address on a physical interface is selected. Or you can manually specify the BGP identifier with bgp router-id.

■

Optional parameters: This field is used to for such optional capabilities as authentication, multiprotocol , and route refresh.

Keepalive Message If a router accepts the parameters specified in its neighbor’s Open message, it responds with a Keepalive. Subsequent Keepalives are sent every 60 seconds by IOS default, or a period equal to one-third the agreed-upon holdtime. Like the holdtime, the keepalive interval can be changed for the entire BGP process with timers bgp or on a per-neighbor or per-peer-group basis with neighbor timers. Note that although BGP offloads several reliability functions to the underlying T session, it does use its own keepalive rather than using the T keepalive.

Update Message The Update message s feasible routes, withdrawn routes, or both. The Update message includes the following information: ■

Network Layer Reachability Information (NLRI): This is one or more (Length, Prefix) tuples that destination prefixes and their lengths. If 206.193.160.0/19 were d, for example, the Length portion would specify the /19 and the Prefix portion would specify 206.193.160. However, as discussed at the beginning of Chapter 3, “BGP and NLRI,” and covered more extensively in Chapter 6, “Multiprotocol BGP,” the NLRI can be more than just a unicast IPv4 prefix.

■

Path attributes: The path attributes, described in a later section of the same name, are characteristics of the d NLRI. The attributes provide the information that allows BGP to choose a shortest path, detect routing loops, and determine routing policy.

■

Withdrawn routes: These are (Length, Prefix) tuples describing destinations that have become unreachable and are being withdrawn from service.

Operation of BGP

Although multiple prefixes might be included in the NLRI field, each Update message describes only a single BGP path (because the path attributes describe only a single path, but that path might lead to multiple destinations). This, again, emphasizes that BGP takes a higher view of an internetwork than an IGP, whose routes always lead to a single destination IP address.

Notification Message The Notification message is sent whenever an error is detected and always causes the BGP connection to close. The section “BGP Message Formats” includes a list of possible errors that can cause a Notification message to be sent. An example of the use of a Notification message is the negotiation of a BGP version between neighbors. If, after establishing a T connection, a BGP-4 speaker receives an Open message specifying version 3, the router responds with a Notification message stating that the version is not ed, and the session is closed.

BGP Finite State Machine The stages of a BGP neighbor connection establishment and maintenance can be described in of a finite state machine. Figure 2-9 and Table 2-1 show the complete BGP finite state machine and the input events that can cause a state transition.

IE 1,7

IE 1,5 IE 7 Active

IE 5

4, 1 IE

2, IE

IE

3

3

2,4

IE

-13

,6,8

IE

4

6,

IE

8-

13

Connect

IE 1

IE 2,3,5-13

Open Sent

8,10

3

,13 ,12 ,10

8 2-

,12,1

IE

IE 2-

IE

IE 2-13

10

Idle

Open Confirm IE 11

Established IE 1,9 IE 1,9,11,12

Figure 2-9

BGP Finite State Machine

87

88

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

Table 2-1 IE

Input Events (IE) of Figure 2-9 Description

1

BGP Start

2

BGP Stop

3

BGP Transport connection open

4

BGP Transport connection closed

5

BGP Transport connection open failed

6

BGP Transport fatal error

7

ConnectRetry timer expired

8

Hold timer expired

9

Keepalive timer expired

10

Receive Open message

11

Receive Keepalive message

12

Receive Update message

13

Receive Notification message

The following sections provide a brief description of each of the six neighbor states, as shown in Figure 2-9.

Idle State BGP always begins in the Idle state, in which it refuses all incoming connections. When a Start event (IE 1) occurs, the BGP process initializes all BGP resources, starts the ConnectRetry timer, initializes a T connection to the neighbor, listens for a T initialization from the neighbor, and changes its state to Connect. The Start event is caused by an operator configuring a BGP process or resetting an existing process, or by the router software resetting the BGP process. An error causes the BGP process to transition to the Idle state. From there, the router may automatically try to issue another Start event. However, limitations should be imposed on how the router does this—constantly trying to restart in the event of persistent error conditions causes flapping. Therefore, after the first transition back to the Idle state, the router sets the ConnectRetry timer and cannot attempt to restart BGP until the timer expires. IOS’s initial ConnectRetry time is 120 seconds; this value cannot be changed. The ConnectRetry time for each subsequent attempt is twice the previous time, meaning that consecutive wait times increase exponentially.

Operation of BGP

Connect State In this state, the BGP process is waiting for the T connection to the neighbor to be completed. If the T connection is successful, the BGP process clears the ConnectRetry timer, completes initialization, sends an Open message to the neighbor, and transitions to the OpenSent state. If the T connection is unsuccessful, the BGP process continues to listen for a connection to be initiated by the neighbor, resets the ConnectRetry timer, and transitions to the Active state. If the ConnectRetry timer expires while in the Connect state, the timer is reset, another attempt is made to establish a T connection with the neighbor, and the process stays in the Connect state. Any other input event causes a transition to Idle.

Active State In this state, the BGP process tries to initiate a T connection with the neighbor. If the T connection is successful, the BGP process clears the ConnectRetry timer, completes initialization, sends an Open message to the neighbor, and transitions to OpenSent. The IOS default Hold time is 180 seconds (3 minutes) and can be changed with the timers bgp statement. If the ConnectRetry timer expires while BGP is in the Active state, the process transitions back to the Connect state and resets the ConnectRetry timer. It also initiates a T connection to the peer and continues to listen for connections from the peer. If the neighbor attempts to establish a T session with an unexpected IP address, the ConnectRetry timer is reset, the connection is refused, and the local process stays in the Active state. Any other input event (except a Start event, which is ignored in the Active state) causes a transition to Idle.

OpenSent State In this state, an Open message has been sent, and BGP is waiting to hear an Open from its neighbor. When an Open message is received, all its fields are checked. If errors exist, a Notification message is sent and the state transitions to Idle. If no errors exist in the received Open message, a Keepalive message is sent and the Keepalive timer is set. The Hold time is negotiated, and the smaller value is agreed upon. If the negotiated Hold time is zero, the Hold and Keepalive timers are not started. The peer connection is determined to be either internal or external, based on the peer’s AS number, and the state is changed to OpenConfirm. If a T disconnect is received, the local process closes the BGP connection, resets the ConnectRetry timer, begins listening for a new connection to be initiated by the neighbor, and transitions to Active. Any other input event (except a start event, which is ignored) causes a transition to Idle.

89

90

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

OpenConfirm State In this state, the BGP process waits for a Keepalive or Notification message. If a Keepalive is received, the state transitions to Established. If a Notification is received, or a T disconnect is received, the state transitions to Idle. If the Hold timer expires, an error is detected, or a Stop event occurs, a Notification is sent to the neighbor and the BGP connection is closed, changing the state to Idle.

Established State In this state, the BGP peer connection is fully established and the peers can exchange Update, Keepalive, and Notification messages. If an Update or Keepalive message is received, the Hold timer is restarted (if the negotiated hold time is nonzero). If a Notification message is received, the state transitions to Idle. Any other event (again, except for the Start event, which is ignored) causes a Notification to be sent and the state to transition to Idle.

Path Attributes A path attribute is a characteristic of an d BGP route. Although the term is specific to BGP, the concept is not unfamiliar to you: Every route ment, no matter what the originating routing protocol, has attributes. For example, every route ment has information (an address prefix) representing some destination, some quantification (metric) of the destination enabling comparison to other routes to the same destination, and some directional information about the destination, such as a next-hop address. BGP routes have the same attributes you are familiar with from other protocols but can also include a number of other attributes that are designed to be manipulated for the creation and communication of routing policies. Each path attribute falls into one of four categories: ■

Well-known mandatory

■

Well-known discretionary

■

Optional transitive

■

Optional nontransitive

First, an attribute is either well known, meaning that it must be recognized by all BGP implementations, or it is optional, meaning that the BGP implementation is not required to the attribute. Well-known attributes are either mandatory, meaning that they must be included in all BGP Update messages, or they are discretionary, meaning that they may or may not be sent in a specific Update message. An optional attribute is either transitive, meaning that a BGP process should accept the Update in which it is included—even if the process doesn’t the attribute—and

Operation of BGP

should the attribute on to its peers, or it is nontransitive, meaning that a BGP process that does not recognize the attribute can quietly ignore the Update in which it is included and not the path to its other peers. In simple , the attribute either can or cannot transit a router. Table 2-2 lists the BGP path attributes. The three well-known mandatory attributes, because they are required to be in every BGP Update, are described in the following subsections. A Cisco-specific attribute called weight is also covered in this section. The other attributes are described within the context of their primary use as policy enablers (Chapter 4), for scaling (Chapter 5), or for carrying multiple NLRI types (Chapter 6). Note If you are already familiar with the Communities and Extended Community attribute, you might wonder why Table 2-2 lists them as scaling features rather than policy enablers. A policy enabler can directly influence the BGP decision process. Communities make it easier to apply policies to a group of routes but do not influence the BGP decision process.

Table 2-2

BGP Path Attributes

Attribute

Class

RFC

Application

ORIGIN

Well-known mandatory

4271

Policy

AS_PATH

Well-known mandatory

4271

Policy, loop detection

NEXT_HOP

Well-known mandatory

4271

Policy

LOCAL_PREF

Well-known discretionary

4271

Policy

ATOMIC_AGGREGATE

Well-known discretionary

4271

Address aggregation

AGGREGATOR

Optional transitive

4271

Address aggregation

COMMUNITIES

Optional transitive

1997

Scaling

EXTENDED COMMUNITY

Optional transitive

4360

Scaling

MULTI_EXIT_DISC (MED)

Optional nontransitive

4271

Policy

ORIGINATOR_ID

Optional nontransitive

4456

Scaling, loop detection, policy

CLUSTER_LIST

Optional nontransitive

4456

Scaling, loop detection, policy

AS4_PATH

Optional transitive

6793

Scaling, policy

91

92

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

Attribute

Class

RFC

Application

AS4_AGGREGATOR

Optional transitive

6793

Scaling, address aggregation

Multiprotocol Reachable NLRI

Optional nontransitive

4760

Multiprotocol BGP

Multiprotocol Unreachable NLRI

Optional nontransitive

4760

Multiprotocol BGP

ORIGIN Attribute ORIGIN is a well-known mandatory attribute that specifies the origin of the routing update. When BGP has multiple routes to the same destination, it uses the ORIGIN as one factor in determining the preferred route. It specifies one of the following origins: ■

IGP: The Network Layer Reachability Information (NLRI) was learned from a protocol internal to the originating AS. An IGP origin gets the highest preference of the ORIGIN values. IOS gives BGP routes an origin of IGP if they are learned from an IGP routing table via the BGP network statement, as described in Chapter 3.

■

EGP: The NLRI was learned from the Exterior Gateway Protocol. EGP is preferred second to IGP. Because EGP is obsolete, you should never encounter this origin type; it’s an artifact of the days when we transitioned from EGP to BGP.

■

Incomplete: The NLRI was learned by some other means. Incomplete is the lowestpreferred ORIGIN value. Incomplete does not imply that the route is in any way faulty, only that the information for determining the origin of the route is incomplete. Routes that BGP learns through redistribution carry the incomplete origin attribute because there is no way to determine the original source of the route.

Although ORIGIN is still a mandatory part of the BGP standard, it was created to help— as the second of the three possible origins indicates—with the transition from EGP to BGP. It might have some limited use in a few “corner case” policy configurations but for the most part should be considered a legacy attribute.

AS_PATH Attribute AS_PATH is a well-known mandatory attribute that uses a sequence of AS numbers to describe the inter-AS path, or AS-level route, to the destination specified by the NLRI. When an AS originates a route—when it s NLRI about a destination within its own AS to an external neighbor—it adds its AS number to the AS_PATH. As subsequent BGP speakers the route to external peers, they prepend their own AS numbers to the AS_PATH (see Figure 210). The result is that the AS_PATH describes all the autonomous systems it has ed through, beginning with the most recent AS and ending with the originating AS.

Operation of BGP

AS500 207.126.0.0/16 [400,200,100]

AS400

207.126.0.0/16 [300,100]

AS300

207.126.0.0/16 [200,100] AS200

207.126.0.0/16 [100]

207.126.0.0/16 [100]

AS100 207.126.0.0/16

Figure 2-10 AS Numbers Are Prepended (Added to the Front of) the AS_PATH List Note that a BGP router adds its AS number to the AS_PATH only when an Update is sent to a neighbor in another AS. That is, an AS number is prepended to the AS_PATH only when the route is d between EBGP peers. If the route is d between IBGP peers—peers within the same autonomous system—no AS number is added. Usually, having multiple instances of the same AS number on the list would make no sense and would defeat the purpose of the AS_PATH attribute. In one case, however, adding multiple instances of a particular AS number to the AS_PATH proves useful. that outgoing route ments directly influence incoming traffic. Normally, the route from AS500 to AS100 in Figure 2-10 es through AS300 because the AS_PATH of that route is shorter (that is, lists fewer AS numbers). But what if the link to AS200 is AS100’s preferred path for incoming traffic? The links along the (400,200,100) path might all be 10G, for example, whereas the links along the (300,100) path are only 1G. Or perhaps AS200 is the primary provider, and AS300 is only the backup provider. Outgoing traffic is sent to AS200, so it is desired that incoming traffic follow the same path. AS100 can influence its incoming traffic by changing the AS_PATH of its d route (Figure 2-11). By adding multiple instances of its own AS number to the list sent to AS300, AS100 can make routers at AS500 think that the (400,200,100) path is the shorter path. This procedure of adding extra AS numbers to the AS_PATH is called AS path prepending.

93

94

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

AS500 207.126.0.0/16 [400,200,100]

AS400

207.126.0.0/16 [300,100,100,100]

AS300

207.126.0.0/16 [200,100] AS200

207.126.0.0/16 [100]

207.126.0.0/16 [100,100,100]

AS100 207.126.0.0/16

Figure 2-11 AS100 Has Prepended Two Extra Instances of Its AS Number to the AS_ PATH d to AS300, to Influence the Path Choice Made at AS500 The AS_PATH attribute has been presented so far as consisting of an ordered sequence of AS numbers that describes the path to a particular destination. There are actually two types of AS_PATH: ■

AS_SEQUENCE: This is the ordered list of AS numbers, as previously described.

■

AS_SET: This is an unordered list of the AS numbers along a path to a destination.

These two types are distinguished in the AS_PATH attribute with a type code, as described in the section “BGP Message Formats.” Note The AS_SEQUENCE and AS_SET types each have a modified version: AS_ CONFED_SEQUENCE and AS_CONFED_SET, respectively. They each perform the same functions as the AS_SEQUENCE and AS_SET but within the context of BGP Confederations (explained in Chapter 5).

Recall that the second function of the AS_PATH is loop prevention. If a BGP speaker sees its own AS number in a received route from an external peer, it knows that a loop has occurred and ignores the route. When aggregation is performed, however, some AS_PATH detail is lost. For example, AS3113 in Figure 2-12 is aggregating the prefixes d by AS225, AS237, and AS810. Because AS3113 originates the aggregate

Operation of BGP

prefix, the AS_PATH associated with it contains only that AS number. As a result, the potential for a loop increases.

Figure 2-12 The Aggregation at AS3113 Causes a Loss of the AS_PATH Information of the Aggregate’s Constituent Prefixes Suppose, for example, AS810 has an alternative connection to another AS, as shown in Figure 2-13. The aggregate from AS3113 is d to AS6571 and from there back to AS810. Because the AS numbers “behind” the aggregation point are not included in the AS_PATH, AS810 does not detect the potential loop. Next, suppose a network within AS810, such as 206.25.225.0/24, fails. The routers within that AS match the aggregate route from AS6571, and a loop occurs. If you think about it, the loop-prevention function of the AS_PATH does not require that the AS numbers be included in any particular order. All that is necessary is that a receiving router recognize whether its AS number is a part of the AS_PATH. This is where AS_SET comes in. When a BGP speaker creates an aggregate from NLRI learned from other autonomous systems, it can include all those AS numbers in the AS_PATH as an AS_SET. For example, Figure 2-14 shows the network of Figure 2-12 with an AS_SET added to the aggregate route. The aggregating router still begins an AS_SEQUENCE, so receiving routers can trace the path back to the aggregator, but an AS_SET is included to prevent routing loops. In this example, you also can see why the AS_SET is an unordered list. Behind the aggregator in

95

96

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

AS3113 are branching paths to the autonomous systems in which the aggregated routes reside. There is no way for an ordered list to describe these separate paths.

Figure 2-13 The Loss of AS_PATH Information at Aggregation Points Weakens the AS_PATH Loop Avoidance Function 206.25.128.0/17 AS_SEQUENCE = (3113) AS_SET = (237,810,225) AS3113 206.25.128.0/19 206.25.192.0/19 (237,225) 206.25.160.0/19 (237)

206.25.192.0/19 (225)

AS225 206.25.192.0/19

206.25.224.0/19 (810)

AS237 206.25.160.0/19

AS810 206.25.224.0/19

Figure 2-14 Including an AS_SET in the AS_PATH of an Aggregate Route Restores the Loop Avoidance That Was Lost in the Aggregation

Operation of BGP

AS_SET involves a trade-off. You already understand that one of the advantages of route summarization is route stability. If a network that belongs to the aggregate fails, the failure is not d beyond the aggregation point. But if an AS_SET is included with the aggregate’s AS_PATH, this stability is reduced. If the link to AS225 in Figure 2-14 fails, for example, the AS_SET changes; this change must be d beyond the aggregation point. However, the visibility of constituent AS numbers associated with an aggregate route is much less of a concern that the visibility of many prefixes behind an aggregate. As it turns out, AS_SET is seldom used in the public Internet at aggregation points. Given the potential instability discussed in the previous paragraph, plus the potential for accidentally including private AS numbers in the AS_SET, and other complexities, RFC 6472 recommends that AS_SET not be used except where a few “corner cases” might justify it. Although AS_SET is still ed by most Internet-grade BGP implementations, including Cisco IOS, RFC 6472 suggests that a future update of BGP might remove AS_SET .

NEXT_HOP Attribute As the name implies, this well-known mandatory attribute describes the IP address of the next-hop router on the path to the d destination. Unlike typical IGPs, however, the IP address described by the BGP NEXT_HOP attribute is not always the address of a neighboring router. The following rules apply: ■

If the advertising router and receiving router are in different autonomous systems (external peers), the NEXT_HOP is the IP address of the advertising router’s interface.

■

If the advertising router and the receiving router are in the same AS (internal peers), and the Update’s NLRI refers to a destination within the same AS, the NEXT_HOP is an IP address belonging to the neighbor that d the route.

■

If the advertising router and the receiving router are internal peers and the Update’s NLRI refers to a destination in a different AS, the NEXT_HOP is the IP address of the external peer from which the route was learned.

Figure 2-15 illustrates the first rule. Here, the advertising router and receiving router are in different autonomous systems. The NEXT_HOP is the interface address of the external peer. So far, this behavior is the same as would be expected of any routing protocol. Figure 2-16 illustrates the second rule. This time, the advertising router and the receiving router are in the same AS, and the destination d is also in the AS. The NEXT_HOP associated with the NLRI is the IP address of the originating router.

97

98

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

Figure 2-15 If a BGP Update Is d via EBGP, the NEXT_HOP Attribute Is the IP Address of the External Peer

Figure 2-16 If a BGP Update Is d via IBGP and the d Destination Is in the Same AS, the NEXT_HOP Attribute Is the IP Address of the Originating Router The advertising router and the receiving router do not share a common data link, but the IBGP T connection is ed through an IGP-speaking router. The receiving router must perform a recursive route lookup (recursive lookups are discussed in Routing T/IP, Volume I) to send a packet to the d destination. For example, suppose the router at 172.16.101.2 in Figure 2-16 must forward a packet with a destination address of 172.16.5.30. It looks up the destination and matches the prefix 172.16.5.0/24;

Operation of BGP

that route indicates a next hop of 172.16.83.2. Because that IP address does not belong to one of the router’s directly connected subnets, the router must then look up the route to 172.16.83.2. That route, learned via the IGP, indicates a next hop of 172.16.101.1. The packet can now be forwarded. This example is important for understanding the dependency of IBGP on the IGP. Figure 2-17 illustrates the third rule. Here, a route has been learned via EBGP and is then ed to an internal peer. Because the destination is in a different AS, the NEXT_HOP of the route ed across the IBGP connection is the interface of the external router from which the route was learned.

Figure 2-17 If a BGP Update Is d via IBGP and the d Destination Is in a Different AS, the NEXT_HOP Attribute Is the IP Address of the External Peer from Which the Route Was Learned In Figure 2-17, the IBGP peer must perform a recursive route lookup to forward a packet to 207.135.64.0/19. However, a potential problem exists. The subnet 192.168.5.0, to which the next-hop address belongs, is not part of AS509. Unless the AS border router s it into AS509, the IGP—and hence the internal peers—will not know about this subnet. And if the subnet is not in the routing tables, the next-hop address for 207.135.64.0/19 is unreachable, and packets for that destination are dropped. Actually, although the route to 207.135.64.0/19 is installed in the internal peer’s BGP table, it is not installed in the routing table because the next-hop address is invalid for that router. One solution to the problem is, of course, to ensure that the external subnet linking the two autonomous systems is known to the internal routers. Although you could use static

99

100

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

routes, the practical method is to run the IGP in ive mode on the external interfaces. In some cases, this might be undesirable. An alternative solution—and the solution that is considered best practice—is to use a configuration option called next-hop-self to cause the AS border router in AS509 to set its own IP address in the NEXT_HOP attribute, in place of the IP address of the external peer. The internal peers would then have a next-hop router address of 172.16.83.2, which is known to the IGP. The configuration of next-hop-self is covered in Chapter 3.

Weight Weight3 is a Cisco-specific BGP path attribute that applies only to routes within an individual router. It is not communicated to other routers. The weight is a number between 0 and 65,535 that can be assigned to a route; the higher the weight, the more preferable the route. When choosing a best path, the BGP decision process considers weight above all other route characteristics except specificity. By default, all routes learned from a peer have a weight of 0, and all routes generated by the local router have a weight of 32,768. Weights can be set for individual routes, or for routes learned from a specific neighbor. For example, peer A and peer B might be advertising the same routes to a BGP speaker. By asg a higher weight to the routes received from peer A, the BGP speaker prefers the routes through that peer. This preference is entirely local to the single router; weights are not included in the BGP updates or in any other way communicated to the BGP speaker’s peers. Accordingly, weights are valuable for influencing the routing decisions of a single router without changing the routing decisions of any other router. Weights are useful when you want one BGP router in an AS to treat some prefixes differently than the way other routers in the AS treat the same prefixes. But this can also be dangerous. Because weight affects only the BGP decision process in a single router, this tells you to carefully consider the implications of using it. Misuse can easily lead to unexpected or inconsistent routing results such as loops.

BGP Decision Process The BGP Routing Information Base (RIB) consists of three parts:

3

■

Adj-RIBs-In: Stores unprocessed routing information that has been learned from BGP Updates received from peers. The routes contained in Adj-RIBs-In are considered feasible routes.

■

Loc-RIB: Contains the routes that the BGP speaker has selected by applying the decision process to the routes contained in Adj-RIBs-In. These routes populate the routing table (RIB) along with routes discovered by other routing protocols.

Older IOS documentation calls this parameter istrative Weight, but more recent documentation has moved away from that term in favor of just Weight. This is probably to avoid confusing it with istrative Distance, an entirely different and protocol-independent parameter.

Operation of BGP

■

Adj-RIBs-Out: Contains the routes that the BGP speaker s to its peers in BGP Updates. The outgoing routing policies determine what routes are placed in Adj-RIBs-Out.

These three parts of the RIB may be three distinct databases, or the RIB may be a single database with pointers to distinguish the three parts. The BGP decision process selects routes by applying incoming routing policies to the routes in the Adj-RIBs-In and by entering the selected or modified routes into the LocRIB. The decision process entails three phases: ■

Phase 1 calculates the degree of preference for each feasible route in the AdjRIBs-In. It is invoked whenever a router receives a BGP Update from a peer in a neighboring AS containing a new route, a changed route, or a withdrawn route. Each route is considered separately, and a nonnegative integer is derived that indicates the degree of preference for that route.

■

Phase 2 chooses the best route out of all the available routes to a particular destination and installs the route in the Loc-RIB. It is invoked only after phase 1 has been completed. Loops are also detected in Phase 2 by examining the AS_PATH. Any routes with the local AS number in the AS_PATH are dropped.

■

Phase 3 adds the appropriate routes to the Adj-RIBs-Out for ment to peers. It is invoked after the Loc-RIB has changed, and only after phase 2 has been completed. Route aggregation, if it is to be performed, happens during this phase.

Barring a routing policy that dictates otherwise, phase 2 always selects the most specific route to a particular destination out of all feasible routes to that destination. It is important to note that if the address specified by the route’s NEXT_HOP attribute is unreachable, the route is not selected. This has particular ramifications for IBGP: A route cannot be selected if it is not “synchronized” with the IGP (refer to Chapter 3). You should have an appreciation by now of the multiple attributes that can be assigned to a BGP route to enforce routing policy within a single router, to internal peers, to adjacent autonomous systems, and beyond. A sequential set of rules is needed for considering these attributes as tie-breakers when a router must select among multiple, equally specific routes to the same destination. This set of rules is the BGP decision process. The decision process used by IOS is as follows:4 1. Prefer the route with the highest weight. This is an IOS-specific function, as described in the previous section. 2. If the weights are equal, prefer the route with the highest LOCAL_PREF value.

4

The BGP decision processes can vary slightly among different vendors, so if you run a multivendor BGP network, you must understand the sequence of decision steps each of your vendors uses. Because the decision process is refined as newer features are added, it can even vary slightly between older and newer versions of IOS.

101

102

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

3. If the LOCAL_PREF values are the same, prefer the route that was originated locally on the router and injected into BGP with the network or aggregate statement or through redistribution. That is, prefer a route that was learned from an IGP or from a direct connection on the same router. Note that a route injected into BGP via the network statement or redistribution is preferred over a local aggregate injected by the aggregate-address statement. All these means of injecting prefixes are covered in Chapter 4. 4. If the LOCAL_PREF is the same and no route was locally originated, prefer the route with the shortest AS_PATH. 5. If the AS_PATH length is the same, prefer the path with the lowest ORIGIN code. IGP is lower than EGP, which is lower than Incomplete. 6. If the ORIGIN codes are the same, prefer the route with the lowest MED (MULTI_EXIT_DISC) value. By default, this comparison is done only if the AS number is the same for all the routes being considered.5 7. If the MED is the same, prefer EBGP routes over Confederation EBGP routes, and prefer Confederation EBGP routes over IBGP routes. 8. If the routes are still equal, prefer the route with the shortest path to the BGP NEXT_HOP. This is the route with the lowest IGP metric to the next-hop address. 9. If the routes are still equal, they are from the same neighboring AS, and BGP multipath is enabled with the maximum-paths statement; install all the equal-cost routes in the Loc-RIB. 10. If the routes are still equal and are external, prefer the path that was received first. This helps reduce flapping by allowing a newer route to take precedence over an older one. If the bgp best path compare-routerid statement is enabled, this step is skipped. 11. If multipath is not enabled, prefer the route with the lowest BGP router ID, or if route reflection (Chapter 5) is used, prefer the route with the lowest ORIGINATOR_ID. 12. If the routes are still equal and route reflection is used, prefer the route with the shortest CLUSTER_LIST. 13. If the routes are still equal, prefer the route d from the neighbor with the lowest IP address.

5

IOS offers two alternatives to the default MED behavior, bgp deterministic-med and bgp alwayscompare-med; these alternatives are explained in Chapter 4.

Operation of BGP

Note Knowing the BGP decision process and the correct order of each step is essential to working with BGP. It’s worth memorizing not only for that reason, but also because you can count on being questioned on it on exams such as CCIE and in job technical interviews. I usually ask a few questions about it when I conduct interviews, and I’ve had to answer questions about it (sadly, not always correctly) when I’ve been the interviewee.

BGP Message Formats BGP messages are carried within T segments using T port 179. The maximum message size is 4096 octets, and the minimum size is 19 octets. All BGP messages have a common header (Figure 2-18). Depending on the message type, a data portion might or might not follow the header.

32 Bits 32 Bits

Figure 2-18

BGP Message Header

Marker is a 16-octet field that was intended to detect loss of synchronization between BGP peers and to authenticate messages when authentication is ed. However, its use is deprecated in RFC 4271, and modern BGP implementations set the field to all ones in all cases; it continues to exist in the message header for backward compatibility with older implementations. Length is a 2-octet field that indicates the total length of the message, including the header, in octets. Type is a 1-octet field specifying the message type. Table 2-3 indicates the possible type codes.

103

104

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

Table 2-3

BGP Type Codes

Code

Type

1

Open

2

Update

3

Notification

4

Keepalive

5

Route Refresh (covered in Chapter 4)

Open Message The Open message, whose format is shown in Figure 2-19, is the first message sent after a T connection has been established. If a received Open message is acceptable, a Keepalive message is sent to confirm the Open. After the Open has been confirmed, the BGP connection is in the Established state and Update, Keepalive, and Notification messages can be sent.

32 Bits 8

8

8

8

Version My Autonomous System

Hold Time BGP Identifier

Opt Param Len Optional Parameters

Figure 2-19

BGP Open Message Format

The minimum length of the Open message including the BGP message header is 29 octets. The BGP Open message contains the following fields: ■

Version: A 1-octet field specifying the BGP version running on the originator.

■

My Autonomous System: A 2-octet field specifying the AS number of the originator.

Operation of BGP

■

Hold Time: A 2-octet number indicating the number of seconds the sender proposes for the hold time. A receiver compares the value of the Hold Time field and the value of its configured hold time and accepts the smaller value or rejects the connection. The hold time must be either 0 or at least 3 seconds.

■

BGP Identifier: The BGP router ID of the originator. Unless a router ID is specified in the BGP configuration, IOS sets its router ID as either the highest IP address of any of its loopback interfaces, or if no loopback interface is configured, the highest IP address of any of its physical interfaces.

■

Optional Parameters Length: A 1-octet field indicating the total length of the following Optional Parameters field, in octets. If the value of this field is zero, no Optional Parameters field is included in the message.

■

Optional Parameters: A variable-length field containing a list of optional parameters. Each parameter is specified by a 1-octet type field, a 1-octet length field, and a variable-length field containing the parameter value.

Update Message The Update message, whose format is shown in Figure 2-20, s a single feasible route to a peer, or to withdraw multiple unfeasible routes, or both.

Withdrawn Routes Length (2 Octets) Withdrawn Routes (Variable) Total Path Attribute Length (2 Octets) Path Attributes (Variable)

Network Layer Reachability Information (Variable)

Figure 2-20

BGP Update Message Format

105

106

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

The BGP Update message contains the following fields:

O

■

Withdrawn Routes Length6: A 2-octet field indicating the total length of the following Withdrawn Routes field, in octets. A value of zero indicates that no routes are being withdrawn and that no Withdrawn Routes field is included in the message.

■

Withdrawn Routes: A variable-length field containing a list of routes to be withdrawn from service. Each route in the list is described with a (Length, Prefix) tuple in which the Length is the length of the prefix and the Prefix is the IP address prefix of the withdrawn route. If the Length part of the tuple is zero, the Prefix matches all routes.

■

Total Path Attribute Length: A 2-octet field indicating the total length of the following Path Attribute field, in octets. A value of zero indicates that attributes and NLRI are not included in this message.

■

Path Attributes: A variable-length field listing the attributes associated with the NLRI in the following field. Each path attribute is a variable-length triple of (Attribute Type, Attribute Length, Attribute Value). The Attribute Type part of the triple is a 2octet field consisting of four flag bits, four unused bits, and an Attribute Type code (see Figure 2-21). Table 2-4 shows the most common Attribute Type codes and the possible Attribute Values for each Attribute Type.

T

P

E

U

U U

U

Attribute Type Code

Flag Bits O: Optional Bit 0 = Well-Known 1 = Optional T: Transitive Bit 0 = Non-Transitive 1 = Transitive P: Partial Bit 0 = Optional transitive attribute is complete. 1 = Optional transitive attribute is partial. E: Extended Length Bit 0 = Attribute length is one octet. 1 = Attribute length is two octets. U: Unused

Figure 2-21

6

Attribute Type Part of the Path Attributes Field in the Update Message

This field was called Unfeasible Routes Length in RFC 1771 and before. Although renamed Withdrawn Routes Length in RFC 4271, there is no difference in function.

Operation of BGP

■

Network Layer Reachability Information: A variable-length field containing a list of (Length, Prefix) tuples. The Length indicates the length in bits of the following prefix, and the Prefix is the IP address prefix of the NLRI. A Length value of zero indicates a prefix that matches all IP addresses.

Table 2-4 Attribute Type Code 1

2

Attribute Types and Associated Attribute Values7

Attribute Type

Attribute Value Code

Attribute Value

ORIGIN

0

IGP

1

EGP

2

Incomplete

1

AS_SET

2

AS_SEQUENCE

3

AS_CONFED_SET

4

AS_CONFED_ SEQUENCE

AS_PATH

3

NEXT_HOP

0

Next-hop IP address

4

MULTI_EXIT_DISC

0

4-octet MED

5

LOCAL_PREF

0

4-octet LOCAL_PREF

6

ATOMIC_AGGREGATE

0

None

7

AGGREGATOR

0

AS number and IP address of aggregator

8

COMMUNITY

0

4-octet community identifier

9

ORIGINATOR_ID

0

4-octet router ID of originator

10

CLUSTER_LIST

0

Variable-length list of cluster IDs

14

MP_REACH_NLRI

0

Variable-length Multiprotocol BGP NLRI

15

MP_UNREACH_NLRI

0

Variable-length Multiprotocol BGP NLRI

7

Attributes are often added to BGP, so this list may not be complete.

107

108

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

Attribute Type Code

Attribute Value Code

Attribute Type

Attribute Value

16

EXTENDED COMMUNITIES

0

16-octet extended community identifier

17

AS4_PATH

0

AS path with 4-octet AS numbers

18

AS4_AGGREGATOR

0

4-octet AS number and IP address of aggregator

Keepalive Message Keepalive messages are exchanged on a period one-third the hold time but not less than 1 second. If the negotiated hold time is 0, Keepalives are not sent. The Keepalive message consists of only the 19-octet BGP message header, with no additional data.

Notification Message Notification messages, whose format is shown in Figure 2-22, are sent when an error condition is detected. The BGP connection is closed immediately after the message is sent.

32 bits 8

8

Error Code

Error Subcode

8

8

Data

Figure 2-22

BGP Notification Message Format

The BGP Notification message contains the following fields: ■

Error Code: A 1-octet field indicating the type of error.

■

Error Subcode: A 1-octet field providing more-specific information about the error. Table 2-5 shows the possible error codes and associated error subcodes.

■

Data: A variable-length field used to diagnose the reason for the error. The contents of the Data field depend on the error code and subcode.

Operation of BGP

Table 2-5

BGP Notification Message Error Codes and Error Subcodes

Error Code

Error

Error Subcode

1

Message Header Error

1

Connection not synchronized

2

Bad message length

3

Bad message type

1

Uned version number

2

Bad peer AS

3

Bad BGP identifier

4

Uned optional parameter

5

Authentication failure (deprecated in RFC 4271)

6

Unacceptable hold time

1

Malformed attribute list

2

Unrecognized well-known attribute

3

Missing well-known attribute

4

Attribute flags error

5

Attribute length error

6

Invalid ORIGIN attribute

7

AS routing loop (deprecated in RFC 4271)

8

Invalid NEXT_HOP attribute

9

Optional attribute error

10

Invalid network field

11

Malformed AS_PATH

2

3

Open Message Error

Update Message Error

Subcode Detail

4

Hold Timer Expired

0

—

5

Finite State Machine Error

0

—

6

Cease

0

—

109

110

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

Configuring and Troubleshooting BGP Peering Many newcomers to BGP approach the protocol with trepidation. The source of this sentiment is that BGP implementations are rarer than IGP implementations. Outside of ISPs, most network s deal with BGP far less than with IGPs, if at all. And even when BGP is used, the configurations in small ISPs and non-ISP subscribers are usually quite basic. Because most networking professionals lack in-depth experience with the protocol, it is often viewed as intimidating. BGP configurations can unarguably be complex. But most of the complexity around BGP involves policy. BGP peering configuration, although still a little more involved than most IGP configurations, is not at all difficult. This section takes you step-by-step through the configuration of BGP peering, from the most basic elements to more refined setups.

Case Study: EBGP Peering A BGP session between routers is configured in two steps: Step 1. Establish the BGP process and specify the local AS number with router bgp. Step 2. Specify a neighbor and the neighbor’s AS number with neighbor remote-as. Figure 2-23 shows two routers in different autonomous systems, and Example 2-6 shows their EBGP configurations. Example 2-6

EBGP Configurations for the Routers in Figure 2-23

Taos router bgp 200 neighbor 192.168.1.226 remote-as 100 ______________________________________ Vail router bgp 100 neighbor 192.168.1.225 remote-as 200

The BGP state changes at Vail can be seen, in Example 2-7, using debug ip bgp.8 In the first few lines, Vail is attempting to open a connection to Taos (192.168.1.225); BGP is not yet enabled at Taos, so the attempts fail and Vail shows Taos in Active state. Then as BGP comes up at Taos, a T connection is accepted; its state transitions from Active to OpenSent as Vail sends an Open message to begin the BGP session. The two routers then

8

Timestamps are turned off for the debug examples throughout this book unless time deltas are important to the example to simplify the output. However, in production networks timestamps are an important part of debug or any other logging function and should be enabled.

Configuring and Troubleshooting BGP Peering

negotiate capabilities. (The multiprotocol and route refresh capabilities negotiated in this example are discussed in Chapters 6 and 4, respectively.) With capabilities agreed upon, Vail changes Taos’ state from OpenSent to OpenConfirm and then to Established.

AS100

Vail

192.168.1.226/30 EBGP

192.168.1.225/30

Taos AS200

Figure 2-23

An EBGP Session Is Established Between Taos and Vail

Example 2-7 debug Is Used to Observe Vail’s BGP State Changes for Taos as the BGP Session Comes Up Vail#debug ip bgp BGP debugging is on for address family: IPv4 Unicast Vail# BGP: 192.168.1.225 open active, local address 192.168.1.226 BGP: 192.168.1.225 open failed: Connection refused by remote host, open active d elayed 34034ms (35000ms max, 28% jitter) BGP: 192.168.1.225 open active, local address 192.168.1.226 BGP: 192.168.1.225 went from Active to OpenSent BGP: 192.168.1.225 sending OPEN, version 4, my as: 100, holdtime 180 seconds BGP: 192.168.1.225 send message type 1, length (incl. header) 45 BGP: 192.168.1.225 rcv message type 1, length (excl. header) 26 BGP: 192.168.1.225 rcv OPEN, version 4, holdtime 180 seconds BGP: 192.168.1.225 rcv OPEN w/ OPTION parameter len: 16 BGP: 192.168.1.225 rcvd OPEN w/ optional parameter type 2 (Capability) len 6 BGP: 192.168.1.225 OPEN has CAPABILITY code: 1, length 4 BGP: 192.168.1.225 OPEN has MP_EXT CAP for afi/safi: 1/1 BGP: 192.168.1.225 rcvd OPEN w/ optional parameter type 2 (Capability) len 2 BGP: 192.168.1.225 OPEN has CAPABILITY code: 128, length 0 BGP: 192.168.1.225 OPEN has ROUTE-REFRESH capability(old) for all address-families BGP: 192.168.1.225 rcvd OPEN w/ optional parameter type 2 (Capability) len 2 BGP: 192.168.1.225 OPEN has CAPABILITY code: 2, length 0

111

112

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

BGP: 192.168.1.225 OPEN has ROUTE-REFRESH capability(new) for all address-families BGP: 192.168.1.225 rcvd OPEN w/ remote AS 200 BGP: 192.168.1.225 went from OpenSent to OpenConfirm BGP: 192.168.1.225 went from OpenConfirm to Established

When you create a neighbor with the neighbor remote-as statement, an entry is created in the BGP neighbor database for the specified neighbor. The command show ip bgp neighbor9 displays either the entire BGP neighbor database or a specified neighbor entry. In Example 2-8, the information Vail has recorded about Taos displays. The information in this display is particularly useful for troubleshooting. The first line of output in Example 2-8 shows the address of Taos (192.168.1.225), its AS number (200), and the type of BGP connection to the router (external). The second line displays the BGP version used between Vail and Taos, and Taos’ router ID. The third line begins by showing the state of the BGP finite state machine and then the time since the present peer connection was established. In this example, Taos has been peered continuously for 23 minutes and 25 seconds. Also of interest are the details of the underlying T connection, the second set of highlighted lines in Example 2-8. They show that the T connection state is Established, that Vail is originating BGP messages from T port 13828, and that the destination port at Taos is 179. The source port can be especially important to note when you capture packets on a link carrying more than one BGP session. Example 2-8 show ip bgp neighbors Command Output Contains Essential Details About the Peer Connection to a Neighbor Vail#show ip bgp neighbors

BGP neighbor is 192.168.1.225,

remote AS 200, external link

BGP version 4, remote router ID 192.168.1.225 BGP state = Established, up for 00:23:25 Last read 00:00:25, last write 00:00:25, hold time is 180, keepalive interval is 60 seconds Neighbor capabilities: Route refresh: d and received(old & new) Address family IPv4 Unicast: d and received Message statistics: InQ depth is 0

9

You can also use show bgp neighbors to display the same information; although, it is not documented in the IOS manuals and might not work with all IOS releases. The output of the show ip bgp neighbors command also varies depending on the IOS release you use.

Configuring and Troubleshooting BGP Peering

OutQ depth is 0 Sent

Rcvd

Opens:

5

5

Notifications:

0

0

Updates:

0

0

51

52

Keepalives: Route Refresh:

0

0

56

57

Total:

Default minimum time between ment runs is 30 seconds

For address family: IPv4 Unicast BGP table version 1, neighbor version 1/0 Output queue size: 0 Index 1, Offset 0, Mask 0x2 1 update-group member Sent

Rcvd

----

----

Prefixes Current:

0

0

Prefixes Total:

0

0

Implicit Withdraw:

0

0

Explicit Withdraw:

0

0

Used as bestpath:

n/a

0

Used as multipath:

n/a

0

Prefix activity:

Local Policy Denied Prefixes:

Outbound

Inbound

--------

-------

0

0

Total:

Number of NLRIs in the update sent: max 0, min 0

Connections established 5; dropped 4 Last reset 00:26:11, due to Peer closed the session Connection state is ESTAB, I/O status: 1, unread input bytes: 0 Connection is ECN Disabled, Mininum incoming TTL 0, Outgoing TTL 1 Local host: 192.168.1.226, Local port: 13828 Foreign host: 192.168.1.225, Foreign port: 179 Connection tableid (VRF): 0

Enqueued packets for retransmit: 0, input: 0

mis-ordered: 0 (0 bytes)

Event Timers (current time is 0xA9F664): Timer

Starts

Wakeups

Next

Retrans

26

0

0x0

TimeWait

0

0

0x0

113

114

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

AckHold

25

2

0x0

SendWnd

0

0

0x0

KeepAlive

0

0

0x0

GiveUp

0

0

0x0

PmtuAger

0

0

0x0

DeadWait

0

0

0x0

Linger

0

0

0x0

ProcessQ

0

0

0x0

iss:

842497347

irs: 2329656545

snduna:

842497887

sndnxt:

842497887

sndwnd:

15845

rcvnxt: 2329657085

rcvwnd:

15845

delrcvwnd:

539

SRTT: 435 ms, RTTO: 1159 ms, RTV: 724 ms, KRTT: 0 ms minRTT: 212 ms, maxRTT: 992 ms, ACK hold: 200 ms Status Flags: active open Option Flags: nagle IP Precedence value : 6

Datagrams (max data segment is 1460 bytes): Rcvd: 50 (out of order: 0), with data: 25, total data bytes: 539 Sent: 31 (retransmit: 0, fastretransmit: 0, partialack: 0, Second Congestion: 0) , with data: 26, total data bytes: 539 Packets received in fast path: 0, fast processed: 0, slow path: 0 fast lock acquisition failures: 0, slow path: 0 Vail#

Case Study: EBGP Peering over IPv6 The T connection between BGP routers can run over either IPv4 or IPv6. Keep in mind that the endpoint addresses of the T session have nothing to do with the address families ed by the BGP session running over the T connection or the types of prefixes exchanged by BGP. BGP peers can exchange both IPv4 and IPv6 prefixes regardless of whether the T session is between IPv4 addresses or IPv6 addresses. Figure 2-24 shows the same two routers of Figure 2-23, except that in this case, the interfaces have IPv6 addresses. Example 2-9 shows the EBGP configurations for these two routers, and you can readily see that they are the same as the configurations in the previous case study except that the neighbor addresses are IPv6.

Configuring and Troubleshooting BGP Peering

AS100

Vail

2001:db8:0:224::2/64

EBGP

2001:db8:0:224::1/64

Taos

AS200

Figure 2-24 An EBGP Session Is Established Between Taos and Vail, This Time with IPv6 Endpoints Example 2-9

EBGP Configurations for the Routers in Figure 2-24

Taos router bgp 200 neighbor 2001:db8:0:224::1 remote-as 100 __________________________________________ Vail router bgp 100 neighbor 2001:db8:0:224::2 remote-as 200

Example 2-10 shows another output from show ip bgp neighbors at Vail, after the configurations of Example 2-9 have been implemented. The neighbor information looks almost identical to that of Example 2-8 (the same fields are highlighted) except the addresses are now IPv6 addresses. Notice, however, that Vail’s BGP router ID remains 192.168.1.225; the BGP router ID is a 32-bit number so cannot be taken from an IPv6 address.

115

116

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

Example 2-10 The Neighbor Database Looks Almost Identical to the One in Example 2-8, Except the Neighbor Addresses Are IPv6 Vail#show ip bgp neighbors

BGP neighbor is 2001:DB8:0:224::1,

remote AS 200, external link

BGP version 4, remote router ID 192.168.1.225 BGP state = Established, up for 00:00:18 Last read 00:00:18, last write 00:00:18, hold time is 180, keepalive interval is 60 seconds Neighbor capabilities: Route refresh: d and received(old & new) Address family IPv4 Unicast: d and received Message statistics: InQ depth is 0 OutQ depth is 0 Sent

Rcvd

Opens:

6

6

Notifications:

0

0

Updates:

0

0

240

280

Keepalives: Route Refresh: Total:

0

0

246

286

Default minimum time between ment runs is 30 seconds

For address family: IPv4 Unicast BGP table version 1, neighbor version 1/0 Output queue size: 0 Index 1, Offset 0, Mask 0x2 1 update-group member Sent

Rcvd

----

----

Prefixes Current:

0

0

Prefixes Total:

0

0

Implicit Withdraw:

0

0

Explicit Withdraw:

0

0

Used as bestpath:

n/a

0

Used as multipath:

n/a

0

Prefix activity:

Local Policy Denied Prefixes: Total:

Outbound

Inbound

--------

-------

0

0

Number of NLRIs in the update sent: max 0, min 0

Configuring and Troubleshooting BGP Peering

Connections established 6; dropped 5 Last reset 00:00:39, due to Peer closed the session Connection state is ESTAB, I/O status: 1, unread input bytes: 0 Connection is ECN Disabled, Mininum incoming TTL 0, Outgoing TTL 1 Local host: 2001:DB8:0:224::2, Local port: 179 Foreign host: 2001:DB8:0:224::1, Foreign port: 59051 Connection tableid (VRF): 0

Enqueued packets for retransmit: 0, input: 0

mis-ordered: 0 (0 bytes)

Event Timers (current time is 0x285A1B0): Timer

Starts

Wakeups

Next

Retrans

3

0

0x0

TimeWait

0

0

0x0

AckHold

2

0

0x0

SendWnd

0

0

0x0

KeepAlive

0

0

0x0

GiveUp

0

0

0x0

PmtuAger

0

0

0x0

DeadWait

0

0

0x0

Linger

0

0

0x0

ProcessQ

0

0

0x0

iss: 1579724289

snduna: 1579724392

sndnxt: 1579724392

irs: 4090406841

rcvnxt: 4090406944

rcvwnd:

16282

sndwnd:

16282

delrcvwnd:

102

SRTT: 253 ms, RTTO: 2915 ms, RTV: 2662 ms, KRTT: 0 ms minRTT: 40 ms, maxRTT: 1484 ms, ACK hold: 200 ms Status Flags: ive open, gen tcbs Option Flags: nagle IP Precedence value : 6

Datagrams (max data segment is 1440 bytes): Rcvd: 6 (out of order: 0), with data: 3, total data bytes: 102 Sent: 3 (retransmit: 0, fastretransmit: 0, partialack: 0, Second Congestion: 0), with data: 3, total data bytes: 230 Packets received in fast path: 0, fast processed: 0, slow path: 0 fast lock acquisition failures: 0, slow path: 0

Also highlighted in this neighbor data are the fields showing that the session s only IPv4 unicast prefix ments; the routers’ BGP sessions have not been configured to carry any other address families (as demonstrated in Chapter 6). So this EBGP session, although running between IPv6 endpoints, can carry only IPv4 prefixes—the default address family.

117

118

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

There is one small difference between the T sessions in Examples 2-8 and 2-10; it has nothing to do with IPv4 or IPv6 but is nevertheless worth noting. In Example 2-8, the local (Vail’s) T port is ephemeral whereas the remote (Taos’) T port is 179. Example 2-10 is just the opposite: Vail’s local T port is 179 and the remote T port at Taos is ephemeral. What this indicates is that in the first case, Vail initiated the T connection (the T initiation is always directed at port 179 for BGP), whereas in the second case Taos initiated the T connection. This is consistent with the historical facts of the connections: In configuring the first example, Vail’s BGP was configured before Taos (and you can observe in Example 2-7 Vail trying to connect to Taos before Taos is ready); in the second example, Taos’ BGP was configured before Vail. Noticing small details such as this one can be useful when you troubleshoot or just try to fully understand a particular BGP session. Such details can also be important if you run an access list on a BGP interface. The ACL might be configured to permit T port 179, but depending on the direction of the session might inadvertently block the ephemeral port.

Case Study: IBGP Peering Figure 2-25 shows another AS, AS400, connected to AS100. (The interfaces connecting Vail and Taos are again IPv4, for simplicity’s sake.) Two more routers, Aspen and Telluride, are added within AS100 and Telluride connects to Alta, in AS400, via EBGP.

AS100 192.168.1.222/30

Aspen

IBGP

192.168.1.198/30 IBGP 192.168.1.197/30

192.168.1.221/30 Vail 192.168.1.226/30

IBGP

Telluride 192.168.1.206/30

EBGP

EBGP 192.168.1.225/30

Taos AS200

192.168.1.205/30

Alta AS400

Figure 2-25 Two Routers Are Added to AS100 and Are Peering via IBGP So That AS200 and AS400 Can Communicate Across AS100

Configuring and Troubleshooting BGP Peering

Each of the three routers in AS100 has an IBGP peering session with the other two routers in the same AS. Recall from the section “External and Internal BGP” in Chapter 1 that a full IBGP mesh—a direct IBGP connection between every BGP router within the same AS—is required for two reasons: ■

The AS_PATH attribute is meaningless within a single AS, so IBGP has no loop avoidance mechanism. A full IBGP mesh means every BGP router directly s its prefixes to every other BGP router in the same AS, removing any need for a router to prefixes learned from one internal peer to another internal peer, which could lead to routing loops. A default BGP rule reinforces the full mesh requirement: BGP cannot routes learned from an internal neighbor to another internal neighbor.10

■

Every BGP router along a forwarding path must know the BGP routes used at the routers with external peers so that packets forwarded to a purely internal BGP router on their way to an external next hop are not dropped by the internal router. For instance, in Figure 2-25 a packet traveling from AS400 to AS200 would be received by Telluride; Telluride’s BGP route to the AS200 destination would have a next-hop address of 192.168.1.225 (Taos’ external interface). Telluride would forward the packet to Aspen to get to that next hop, assuming Vail is advertising the subnet internally. But if Aspen does not also know the BGP route to the AS200 destination, it drops the packet. Therefore, in addition to the IBGP session between Vail and Telluride, each of those externally connected routers must tell Aspen about its external routes.

At a basic level, IBGP peering is configured exactly the same as EBGP peering; it is IBGP rather than EBGP only in that the AS number referenced by neighbor remote-as is the same as the local AS number referenced by router bgp. Example 2-11 shows the configurations for Vail, Aspen, and Telluride. The router bgp statements in all three configurations show that the routers are all in AS100; you can then easily see what neighbor remote-as statements in each configuration point to AS100, and from that you know that those sessions are IBGP. Example 2-11

Configurations for the Routers of AS100 in Figure 2-25

Vail router bgp 100 neighbor 192.168.1.197 remote-as 100 neighbor 192.168.1.222 remote-as 100 neighbor 192.168.1.225 remote-as 200 ______________________________________

10

This rule is modified when route reflectors, examined in Chapter 5, are implemented.

119

120

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

Aspen router bgp 100 neighbor 192.168.1.197 remote-as 100 neighbor 192.168.1.221 remote-as 100 ______________________________________ Telluride router bgp 100 neighbor 192.168.1.198 remote-as 100 neighbor 192.168.1.205 remote-as 400 neighbor 192.168.1.221 remote-as 100

Example 2-12 introduces another command you can use regularly when maintaining and troubleshooting BGP networks: show ip bgp summary.11 This command gives you an overview of the BGP peerings configured on the router and the state of each of those peerings. The output from this command first shows you the local router’s BGP router ID and AS number, and the current version of the BGP table. (The table version is incremented when policies or other activities change the contents of the table.) After this information a table lists the following for each configured neighbor:

11

■

The address configured in the neighbor remote-as statement

■

The BGP version used for that neighbor

■

The neighbor’s AS number

■

The number of BGP messages received from and sent to the neighbor

■

The last version of the local BGP table sent to the neighbor

■

The number of messages in queue from and to the neighbor

■

The length of time the BGP session has been Established with the neighbor, or the status of the neighbor if not in Established state

■

The state of the neighbor if not Established; or if the state is Established, the number of prefixes received from the neighbor

You can also use show bgp summary to display the same information; although, it is not documented in the IOS manuals and might not work with all IOS releases. The output of the show ip bgp summary command also varies depending on the IOS release you use.

Configuring and Troubleshooting BGP Peering

Example 2-12 Although the Other BGP Sessions Are Established, the IBGP Peering Between Vail and Telluride Is Not; Its State Is Active ! Vail Vail#show ip bgp summary

BGP router identifier 192.168.1.226, local AS number 100 BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1

Neighbor

V

192.168.1.197

4

100

AS MsgRcvd MsgSent 0

0

TblVer 0

InQ OutQ Up/Down 0

0 never

State/PfxRcd

192.168.1.222

4

100

29

22

1

0

0 00:18:59

0

192.168.1.225

4

200

43

43

1

0

0 00:00:12

0

Active

_________________________________________________________________________________ ! Aspen Aspen#show ip bgp summary BGP router identifier 192.168.1.222, local AS number 100 BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 Neighbor

V

192.168.1.197

4

100

AS MsgRcvd MsgSent 12

20

TblVer 1

InQ OutQ Up/Down 0

0 00:15:43

State/PfxRcd 0

192.168.1.221

4

100

23

30

1

0

0 00:26:14

0

_________________________________________________________________________________ ! Telluride Telluride#show ip bgp summary BGP router identifier 192.168.1.206, local AS number 100 BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1

Neighbor

V

192.168.1.198

4

100

AS MsgRcvd MsgSent 21

13

TblVer 1

InQ OutQ Up/Down 0

0 00:10:06

192.168.1.205

4

400

4

5

1

0

0 00:01:06

192.168.1.221

4

100

0

0

0

0

0 never

State/PfxRcd 0 0 Active

The three displays in Example 2-12 show that all the EBGP and IBGP sessions are Established except for the IBGP session between Vail (192.168.1.221) and Telluride (192.168.1.197); Vail and Telluride each show the other in Active state. A quick look at Vail’s routing table (Example 2-13) reveals the problem: Vail has no route to Telluride’s interface 192.168.1.197. Although its routing table is not shown here, Telluride does not have a route to Vail’s interface 192.168.1.221 either.

121

122

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

Example 2-13 Vail Does Not Have a Route to 192.168.1.197 and Cannot Establish an IBGP Session with Telluride Vail#show ip route

Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2 i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2 ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per- static route o - ODR, P - periodic ed static route

Gateway of last resort is not set

192.168.1.0/30 is subnetted, 2 subnets C

192.168.1.224 is directly connected, Serial1/0

C

192.168.1.220 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0

Vail#

This simple example demonstrates a problem commonly encountered when working with IBGP. Unlike IGPs, IBGP sessions often span multiple router hops; a router cannot establish an IBGP session unless it knows how to reach its peer. Therefore, one of the first steps in troubleshooting an IBGP session that stays in Active state (listening for a configured neighbor) is to look in the routing tables of both neighbors and see if they know how to find each other. The problem with the IBGP session between Vail and Telluride is resolved by configuring an IGP within AS100—in this example, OSPF is used, but anything that gives the neighbors the reachability information they need in their routing tables can work. Example 2-14 shows that Vail’s routing table now has a route to subnet 192.168.1.196 and to the neighbor address 192.168.1.197 configured for Telluride. Example 2-15 shows that with the three routers in AS100 now exchanging internal reachability information via OSPF, all IBGP sessions are Established. Example 2-14 Telluride

After an IGP (OSPF in This Case) Is Configured, Vail Has a Route to

Vail#show ip route

Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2 i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2

Configuring and Troubleshooting BGP Peering

ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per- static route o - ODR, P - periodic ed static route

Gateway of last resort is not set

192.168.1.0/30 is subnetted, 3 subnets C

192.168.1.224 is directly connected, Serial1/0

O

192.168.1.196 [110/2] via 192.168.1.222, 00:00:07, FastEthernet0/0

C

192.168.1.220 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0

Vail#

Example 2-15 Vail and Telluride Now Know How to Find Each Other and Their IBGP Session Is Established Vail#show ip bgp summary BGP router identifier 192.168.1.226, local AS number 100

BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1

Neighbor

V

192.168.1.197

4

100

AS MsgRcvd MsgSent 4

4

TblVer 1

InQ OutQ Up/Down 0

0 00:00:05

State/PfxRcd 0

192.168.1.222

4

100

93

56

1

0

0 00:00:56

0

192.168.1.225

4

200

131

142

1

0

0 00:00:05

0

_______________________________________________________________________________ Aspen#show ip bgp summary BGP router identifier 192.168.1.222, local AS number 100

BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1

Neighbor

V

192.168.1.197

4

100

AS MsgRcvd MsgSent 47

81

TblVer 1

InQ OutQ Up/Down 0

0 00:02:53

State/PfxRcd 0

192.168.1.221

4

100

57

95

1

0

0 00:03:31

0

_______________________________________________________________________________ Telluride#show ip bgp summary BGP router identifier 192.168.1.206, local AS number 100 BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1

Neighbor

V

192.168.1.198

4

100

AS MsgRcvd MsgSent 82

47

TblVer 1

InQ OutQ Up/Down 0

0 00:02:09

State/PfxRcd 0

192.168.1.205

4

400

84

73

1

0

0 00:01:03

0

192.168.1.221

4

100

5

5

1

0

0 00:01:37

0

123

124

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

The IBGP configurations are now sufficient for the topology in Figure 2-25; however, the topology has a problem: If the link between Telluride and Aspen or the link between Aspen and Vail fails, AS100 and AS400 can no longer communicate. AS100 needs a more resilient topology both for packet forwarding and for BGP information exchange. A link added between Telluride and Vail, as shown in Figure 2-26, gives AS100 the redundancy to survive the failure of a single internal link.

AS100 192.168.1.222/30

Aspen

IBGP

192.168.1.198/30 IBGP 192.168.1.197/30

192.168.1.221/30 192.168.1.193/30

Vail

192.168.1.226/30

192.168.1.194/30 IBGP

Telluride

192.168.1.206/30

EBGP

EBGP 192.168.1.225/30

Taos AS200

Figure 2-26

192.168.1.205/30

Alta AS400

A Link Between Vail and Telluride Gives AS100 Some Redundancy

Although the added link does provide some redundancy, it raises a question about the IBGP configuration for AS100. If a link fails, you want the IBGP sessions that were using the link to be rerouted across the alternative path. With the IBGP sessions running between physical interfaces, you cannot be sure that this will happen. One remedy might be to configure redundant IBGP sessions. For example, Vail and Telluride might be configured for peering both between 192.168.1.193 and 192.168.1.194 and between 192.168.1.221 and 192.168.1.197. However, as the topology of an AS grows in complexity, this approach (configuring all routers with redundant IBGP connections to all physical interfaces) quickly escalates to undesirably long BGP configurations and to an undesirable number of IBGP sessions. A better approach is to peer not between physical interfaces but between loopback interfaces, as shown in Figure 2-27. Note that the physical links have been removed from the drawing; when you peer between loopback addresses, you remove physical interface dependencies from the IBGP topology. Only a single IBGP session between each router

Configuring and Troubleshooting BGP Peering

within the AS is required, and that session is routed over the best available path. Should a link on that path fail, the session is rerouted—in most cases rerouted fast enough that the BGP session does not fail—over the next best path.

AS100 Aspen Loopback0 192.168.100.2/32 IBGP

IBGP

Loopback0 192.168.100.1/32

Loopback0 192.168.100.3/32

Vail 192.168.1.226/30

IBGP

Telluride 192.168.1.206/30

EBGP

EBGP 192.168.1.225/30

Taos AS200

192.168.1.205/30

Alta AS400

Figure 2-27 Using Loopback Interfaces as the IBGP Endpoints Eliminates Any Dependencies on Physical Interfaces Configuring IBGP peering between loopback interfaces requires an extra configuration statement. You not only specify the neighbor’s loopback address instead of a physical address for the remote end of the session, you must also specify the local router’s loopback interface as the originating end of the session. Example 2-16 shows an improved configuration for Vail. The EBGP configuration remains the same, but the neighbor remote-as statements for Aspen and Telluride now point to those routers’ loopback interface addresses rather than physical interfaces as in the previous configuration examples. The IBGP configurations of Aspen and Telluride also now point to loopback interfaces instead of physical interfaces. But that is not enough. By default, an outgoing T session is sourced from its outgoing physical interface address. If every router in Figure 2-27 tried to originate its IBGP T session from a physical interface and going to a loopback interface, although its peer also originates at a physical interface and terminates at the local router’s loopback, the endpoints of the attempted T sessions never match and the sessions do not come up.

125

126

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

So neighbor update-source tells the router to originate the T session going to the specified neighbor from the specified local loopback interface. Example 2-16 Peering Between Loopback Addresses Requires the neighbor updatesource Statement to Indicate That the Local End of the Session Should Be Sourced from the Local Loopback Interface, as Shown in Vail’s Modified Configuration router bgp 100

neighbor 192.168.1.225 remote-as 200 neighbor 192.168.100.2 remote-as 100 neighbor 192.168.100.2 update-source Loopback0 neighbor 192.168.100.3 remote-as 100 neighbor 192.168.100.3 update-source Loopback0

Example 2-17 shows the results of the three routers of AS100 in Figure 2-27. The IBGP sessions are all up (because of OSPF advertising the loopback addresses). You can also observe another difference from the earlier observed sessions. Recall from the discussion in the section on the Open message than BGP chooses its router ID the same way OSPF does: It prefers the loopback address and chooses the numerically highest physical interface address if the loopback is not available. With the new configuration we have made loopback addresses available, and you can see that the BGP router IDs in each of Example 2-17’s three displays are the loopback address of that router. Because the same loopback address is probably used to identify the router in several other ways, such as the OSPF router ID and even as a DNS entry for telnetting to the router by name, using the loopback for the BGP router ID enforces consistency and makes the BGP ID easily recognizable. The Case Study “Managing and Securing BGP Sessions” shows you an even better way to configure a predictable and consistent BGP router ID. Example 2-17 The IBGP Sessions Now Run Between Loopback Interfaces Instead of Physical Interfaces Vail#show ip bgp summary BGP router identifier 192.168.100.1, local AS number 100 BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1

Neighbor

V

192.168.1.225

4

200

AS MsgRcvd MsgSent 5

5

TblVer 1

InQ OutQ Up/Down 0

0 00:01:09

State/PfxRcd 0

192.168.100.2

4

100

15

14

1

0

0 00:11:26

0

192.168.100.3

4

100

12

13

1

0

0 00:09:00

0

______________________________________________________________________________

Configuring and Troubleshooting BGP Peering

Aspen#show ip bgp summary BGP router identifier 192.168.100.2, local AS number 100 BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1

Neighbor

V

192.168.100.1

4

100

AS MsgRcvd MsgSent 14

14

TblVer 1

InQ OutQ Up/Down 0

0 00:11:42

State/PfxRcd 0

192.168.100.3

4

100

11

13

1

0

0 00:08:59

0

______________________________________________________________________________ Telluride#show ip bgp summary BGP router identifier 192.168.100.3, local AS number 100 BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1

Neighbor

V

192.168.1.205

4

400

AS MsgRcvd MsgSent 8

7

TblVer 1

InQ OutQ Up/Down 0

0 00:03:02

State/PfxRcd 0

192.168.100.1

4

100

20

20

1

0

0 00:17:09

0

192.168.100.2

4

100

21

19

1

0

0 00:16:51

0

Case Study: Connected Check and EBGP Multihop Only the IBGP sessions in the previous example run between loopback addresses. The EBGP sessions still run between directly connected physical interfaces, and that is standard practice for the great majority of EBGP sessions. The IOS default settings ensure that external BGP peers are directly connected by two means: ■

Setting a TTL value of 1 in packets containing BGP messages to external neighbors so that if the packet crosses a router hop the TTL is decremented to 0 and the packet is dropped

■

Checking the IP address of the configured neighbor to ensure that it belongs to a directly connected subnet

However, there are cases in which running EBGP between loopback interfaces is useful. Consider Figure 2-28, in which Telluride and Alta are connected by four equal-cost links. Configuring four separate EBGP sessions, one for each link, is undesirable because you do not want the added configuration complexity. More important, such a configuration causes BGP to four identical sets of prefixes between the routers, reducing network scalability. At the same time, you do not want to choose just one of the four links to carry the EBGP session. If that link was to fail, EBGP would fail even though there are still three good links between the routers. You want to take advantage of the redundancy and load-sharing capabilities of the four parallel links. A solution for this case12 is to run EBGP between the routers’ loopback interfaces, as shown in Figure 2-29. 12

Another solution is to “bundle” the links using a link aggregation protocol, which does not require you to configure EBGP Multihop or disable the connect check.

127

128

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

AS 100 7HOOXULGH·V([WHUQDO,QWHUIDFHV S1/0: 192.168.1.206/30 S1/1: 192.168.1.210/30 S1/2: 192.168.1.214/30 S1/3: 192.168.1.218/30

Telluride

Alta

AS 400

Figure 2-28

Four Equal-Cost Links Connect Telluride and Alta

AS100 Telluride

Loopback0 192.168.100.3/32

EBGP

Loopback0 192.168.200.1/32

Alta

AS400

Figure 2-29 Using Loopback Interfaces for the EBGP Endpoints Takes Advantage of the Redundancy and Load Sharing of Multiple Physical Links

Configuring and Troubleshooting BGP Peering

The configuration is similar to the configurations in the preceding IBGP example: You specify the neighbor’s loopback address as the neighbor address, use the neighbor update-source statement to source the session from the local loopback interface, and give the routers on each side a means of finding the remote peering address. By definition an IGP is not run between routers in different autonomous systems, so in this case, static routes are used; for each physical link, a static route is configured pointing to the remote loopback address and specifying the address of the far end of the link as the next hop. Example 2-18 shows Alta’s EBGP configuration; Telluride’s configuration is similar. Example 2-18 Alta’s EBGP Configuration Specifies That EBGP Messages It Originates to Neighbor 192.168.100.3 (Telluride) Are Originated from Its Loopback0 Interface, and Static Routes Are Configured to Find the Neighbor Address Across All Four of the Physical Links router bgp 400 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes neighbor 192.168.100.3 remote-as 100 neighbor 192.168.100.3 disable-connected-check neighbor 192.168.100.3 update-source Loopback0 no auto-summary ! ip route 192.168.100.3 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.206 ip route 192.168.100.3 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.210 ip route 192.168.100.3 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.214 ip route 192.168.100.3 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.218

Example 2-19 shows that Alta’s neighbor state to Telluride is Idle. A closer look shows, near the bottom of the display, that there is no active T session because the neighbor address 192.168.100.3 is not directly connected. This is the connected check that IOS does by default for EBGP neighbors. Example 2-19 The Neighbor State to Telluride Is Idle Because the IOS Default Connected Check Shows That the Address Is Not Directly Connected to a Local Subnet Alta#show ip bgp neighbor 192.168.100.3 BGP neighbor is 192.168.100.3,

remote AS 100, external link

BGP version 4, remote router ID 0.0.0.0 BGP state = Idle Last read 00:00:00, last write 00:00:00, hold time is 180, keepalive interval is 60 seconds Message statistics: InQ depth is 0 OutQ depth is 0

129

130

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

Sent

Rcvd

Opens:

0

0

Notifications:

0

0

Updates:

0

0

Keepalives:

0

0

Route Refresh:

0

0

Total:

0

0

Default minimum time between ment runs is 30 seconds

For address family: IPv4 Unicast BGP table version 1, neighbor version 0/0 Output queue size: 0 Index 1, Offset 0, Mask 0x2 1 update-group member Sent

Rcvd

----

----

Prefixes Current:

0

0

Prefixes Total:

0

0

Implicit Withdraw:

0

0

Explicit Withdraw:

0

0

Used as bestpath:

n/a

0

Used as multipath:

n/a

0

Prefix activity:

Local Policy Denied Prefixes:

Outbound

Inbound

--------

-------

0

0

Total:

Number of NLRIs in the update sent: max 0, min 0

Connections established 0; dropped 0 Last reset never External BGP neighbor not directly connected. No active T connection Alta#

For situations in which an external BGP neighbor is directly connected but the neighbor address is not a part of a local subnet—the most common instance of which is EBGP peering between loopback interfaces—you can disable the IOS connected check with the statement neighbor disable-connected-check. Example 2-20 shows Alta’s configuration with this statement added. The statement is also added to Telluride’s configuration. Example 2-21 shows that the BGP session between the two loopback addresses is now established.

Configuring and Troubleshooting BGP Peering

Example 2-20 Alta’s EBGP Configuration Now Includes the neighbor disableconnected-check Statement router bgp 400 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes neighbor 192.168.100.3 remote-as 100 neighbor 192.168.100.3 disable-connected-check neighbor 192.168.100.3 update-source Loopback0 no auto-summary ! ip route 192.168.100.3 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.206 ip route 192.168.100.3 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.210 ip route 192.168.100.3 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.214 ip route 192.168.100.3 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.218

Example 2-21 With the Connected Check Disabled, the EBGP Session Between Alta and Telluride Is Now Established Alta#show ip bgp neighbor 192.168.100.3 BGP neighbor is 192.168.100.3,

remote AS 100, external link

BGP version 4, remote router ID 192.168.100.3 BGP state = Established, up for 00:10:06 Last read 00:00:05, last write 00:00:05, hold time is 180, keepalive interval is 60 seconds Neighbor capabilities:

[Remaining output deleted]

Figure 2-30 depicts another EBGP peering scenario that is frequently encountered. An EBGP session is again running between the loopback interfaces of Alta and Telluride, but now the two routers are not directly connected. The session must through the router Copper, which is not running BGP at all. Copper might be a filtering router or some other security device that examines packets before they’re allowed to enter AS100, or it might be one of many edge routers that aggregate EBGP sessions to one or a few routers interior to AS100. The point is that just disabling the IOS connected check is not sufficient to make this scenario work because by default EBGP messages are sent with a TTL of 1. Packets ing from Alta to Copper to Telluride must have a TTL of at least 2 to for the TTL being decremented by 1 as it es through Copper. The neighbor ebgp-multihop statement changes the default TTL in EBGP messages to specified neighbors. Example 2-22 shows the configurations of the three routers in Figure 2-30. Simple reachability is configured with OSPF between Telluride and Copper, a static route at Copper for Alta’s loopback address, and a static default route pointing to Copper at Alta. Most important, notice that there is no BGP running at Copper. The

131

132

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

neighbor ebgp-multihop statement is used at Telluride and Alta to change the default TTL of their EBGP messages to 2; when the messages transit Copper the TTL is decremented to 1, and the messages safely arrive at their destination. If the messages had retained their default TTL of 1 upon transmission, the TTL would be decremented to 0 at Copper, and the packets would be dropped.

AS100 Telluride Loopback0 192.168.100.3/32

Copper (No BGP) 192.168.1.221/30

EBGP

Loopback0 192.168.200.1/32 Alta

AS400

Figure 2-30

EBGP Peering Scenario for Two Routers Not Directly Connected

Example 2-22 Routers Telluride and Alta in Figure 2-30 Are Configured to Establish an EBGP Session Across Two Router Hops Telluride router ospf 1 log-adjacency-changes network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 0 ! router bgp 100 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes neighbor 192.168.200.1 remote-as 400 neighbor 192.168.200.1 ebgp-multihop 2

Configuring and Troubleshooting BGP Peering

neighbor 192.168.200.1 update-source Loopback0 no auto-summary ! __________________________________________________ Copper router ospf 1 log-adjacency-changes redistribute static network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 0 ! ip route 192.168.200.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.222 ! __________________________________________________ Alta router bgp 400 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes neighbor 192.168.100.3 remote-as 100 neighbor 192.168.100.3 ebgp-multihop 2 neighbor 192.168.100.3 update-source Loopback0 no auto-summary ! ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.221

Example 2-23 shows that Alta’s neighbor state for Telluride is Established. Looking further down the display, you can also see that the outgoing TTL is 2, changed from the default outgoing TTL of 1. Example 2-23

Alta’s Neighbor State to Telluride (192.168.100.3) Is Established

Alta#show ip bgp neighbor 192.168.100.3 BGP neighbor is 192.168.100.3,

remote AS 100, external link

BGP version 4, remote router ID 192.168.100.3 BGP state = Established, up for 00:26:41 Last read 00:00:41, last write 00:00:41, hold time is 180, keepalive interval is 60 seconds Neighbor capabilities: Route refresh: d and received(old & new) Address family IPv4 Unicast: d and received Message statistics: InQ depth is 0 OutQ depth is 0 Sent

Rcvd

Opens:

1

1

Notifications:

0

0

133

134

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

Updates:

0

0

28

28

Keepalives: Route Refresh:

0

0

29

29

Total:

Default minimum time between ment runs is 30 seconds

For address family: IPv4 Unicast BGP table version 1, neighbor version 1/0 Output queue size: 0 Index 1, Offset 0, Mask 0x2 1 update-group member Sent

Rcvd

----

----

Prefixes Current:

0

0

Prefixes Total:

0

0

Implicit Withdraw:

0

0

Explicit Withdraw:

0

0

Used as bestpath:

n/a

0

Used as multipath:

n/a

0

Prefix activity:

Local Policy Denied Prefixes:

Outbound

Inbound

--------

-------

0

0

Total:

Number of NLRIs in the update sent: max 0, min 0

Connections established 1; dropped 0 Last reset never External BGP neighbor may be up to 2 hops away. Connection state is ESTAB, I/O status: 1, unread input bytes: 0 Connection is ECN Disabled, Mininum incoming TTL 0, Outgoing TTL 2 Local host: 192.168.200.1, Local port: 179 Foreign host: 192.168.100.3, Foreign port: 29761 Connection tableid (VRF): 0

Enqueued packets for retransmit: 0, input: 0

mis-ordered: 0 (0 bytes)

Event Timers (current time is 0x22885C): Timer

Starts

Wakeups

Next

Retrans

29

0

0x0

TimeWait

0

0

0x0

AckHold

29

1

0x0

SendWnd

0

0

0x0

KeepAlive

0

0

0x0

GiveUp

0

0

0x0

Configuring and Troubleshooting BGP Peering

PmtuAger

0

0

0x0

DeadWait

0

0

0x0

Linger

0

0

0x0

ProcessQ

0

0

0x0

iss: 3118002936

snduna: 3118003514

sndnxt: 3118003514

irs: 3626178200

rcvnxt: 3626178778

rcvwnd:

16346

sndwnd:

16346

delrcvwnd:

38

SRTT: 294 ms, RTTO: 345 ms, RTV: 51 ms, KRTT: 0 ms minRTT: 36 ms, maxRTT: 312 ms, ACK hold: 200 ms Status Flags: ive open, gen tcbs Option Flags: nagle IP Precedence value : 6

Datagrams (max data segment is 536 bytes): Rcvd: 58 (out of order: 0), with data: 29, total data bytes: 577 Sent: 31 (retransmit: 0, fastretransmit: 0, partialack: 0, Second Congestion: 0), with data: 28, total data bytes: 577 Packets received in fast path: 0, fast processed: 0, slow path: 0 fast lock acquisition failures: 0, slow path: 0 Alta#

You might ask why the neighbor disable-connected-check statement is not needed in this configuration. Alta and Telluride are obviously not directly connected, and the loopback addresses do not belong to the same subnet, yet just as obviously in Example 2-23 the EBGP session between their loopback interfaces works. The answer is that the connected check is automatically disabled when the neighbor ebgp-multihop statement increases the TTL Using the neighbor ebgp multihop statement to change the TTL to 2 or more would make the scenario in Figure 2-29 work just as well as using the neighbor disableconnected-check statement did. This leads to a commonly held misconception that the TTL is decremented when a packet is sent to an IP address on a neighboring router when the destination address is not a part of a locally connected subnet. This is not the case. The TTL of any IP packet is decremented only when the packet leaves a router—a true router hop. So if you want to establish an EBGP session to an IP address on a directly connected router that does not belong to a directly connected subnet, as shown in Figure 2-29, use the neighbor disable-connected-check statement. This enables you to establish the connection without sacrificing the default TTL behavior. If you must establish a EBGP session with a neighbor that is truly more than one router hop away, use the neighbor ebgp-multihop statement, but allow only the number of router hops necessary to reach the neighbor.

135

136

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

Case Study: Managing and Securing BGP Connections The examples up to this point have given you everything you need to configure fully functional BGP sessions, and have given you an overview of the tools for observing and troubleshooting the sessions. But there are a few more configuration features that, although not necessary for getting a session up and running, are useful for making the session more manageable and that are essential for making the session secure. Note In addition to the features demonstrated in this case study, BGP peer groups and peer templates make large BGP configurations more manageable. Peer groups and peer templates are covered in Chapter 5 as scaling features because as configuration complexity grows, these grouping tools become not just convenient but also almost essential for configuration control.

Example 2-24 shows the BGP configuration for Vail in Figure 2-27, with some added management and security features. Example 2-24 A Number of Management and Security Features Have Been Added to Vail’s (Figure 2-27) BGP Configuration router bgp 100 bgp router-id 192.168.100.1 bgp log-neighbor-changes neighbor 192.168.1.225 remote-as 200 neighbor 192.168.1.225 description Taos neighbor 192.168.1.225 N0rdic neighbor 192.168.1.225 ttl-security hops 1 neighbor 192.168.100.2 remote-as 100 neighbor 192.168.100.2 description Aspen neighbor 192.168.100.2 aLpine neighbor 192.168.100.2 update-source Loopback0 neighbor 192.168.100.3 remote-as 100 neighbor 192.168.100.3 description Telluride neighbor 192.168.100.3 aLpine neighbor 192.168.100.3 update-source Loopback0 neighbor 192.168.100.10 remote-as 100 neighbor 192.168.100.10 description Whistler neighbor 192.168.100.10 aLpine neighbor 192.168.100.10 shutdown neighbor 192.168.100.10 update-source Loopback0 !

The first new statement in Vail’s configuration is bgp router-id. As previously discussed, IOS uses the same procedure to acquire a BGP router ID as it does for the OSPF router

Configuring and Troubleshooting BGP Peering

ID: It uses a loopback interface address if one exists, and if not it uses the numerically highest physical interface address. The bgp router-id statement overrides this automatic procedure and manually assigns a BGP router ID. You can use this statement if you want the BGP router ID to be something different from a loopback interface address, or—as in the example here—you can use the command to ensure that the BGP router ID remains stable and predictable even if the loopback address is added, changed, or deleted. The next new statement shown in Example 2-24 is bgp log-neighbor-changes. In all recent IOS releases, this feature is enabled by default, so when you create a BGP configuration the statement is automatically entered. But it is worthwhile to check your configuration to ensure that the statement is there because it provides another key troubleshooting tool. When the status of a neighbor changes, this feature records the change and the cause of the change either in the router’s logging buffer or, if syslog is configured, to an external syslog server. The entries in the logging buffer display with the show logging command, as shown in Example 2-25. The log entries in this example (after some information about the logging buffer) reveal several neighbor events at Vail. The first entry records an adjacency establishment with neighbor 192.168.100.3 (Telluride in Figure 2-27). The second entry shows that a little less than 4 minutes later, the adjacency went down. The entry, also important, indicates the reason the adjacency went down: Telluride closed the session. You know from this information that the session was closed gracefully by BGP rather than suffering a “hard” failure. A minute later, according to the third entry, the adjacency to Telluride is re-established. Example 2-25 bgp log-neighbor-changes Statement Enables Logging of Changes in BGP Neighbor Status, Which Can Then Be Observed with the show logging Command Vail#show logging

Syslog logging: enabled (10 messages dropped, 0 messages rate-limited, 0 flushes, 0 overruns, xml disabled, filtering disabled)

No Active Message Discriminator.

No Inactive Message Discriminator.

Console logging: level debugging, 505 messages logged, xml disabled, filtering disabled Monitor logging: level debugging, 0 messages logged, xml disabled, filtering disabled Buffer logging:

level debugging, 505 messages logged, xml disabled,

137

138

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

filtering disabled Logging Exception size (8192 bytes) Count and timestamp logging messages: disabled

No active filter modules.

ESM: 0 messages dropped

Trap logging: level informational, 509 message lines logged

Log Buffer (8192 bytes):

*Aug 21 07:11:38: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 192.168.100.3 Up *Aug 21 07:15:16: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 192.168.100.3 Down Peer closed the session *Aug 21 07:16:17: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 192.168.100.3 Up *Aug 21 07:19:35: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial1/0, changed state to up *Aug 21 07:21:03: %T-6-BADAUTH: No MD5 digest from 192.168.1.225(179) to 192.168.1.226(20308) *Aug 21 07:21:04: %T-6-BADAUTH: No MD5 digest from 192.168.1.225(179) to 192.168.1.226(20308) *Aug 21 07:21:04: %T-6-BADAUTH: No MD5 digest from 192.168.1.225(179) to 192.168.1.226(20308) *Aug 21 07:21:06: %T-6-BADAUTH: No MD5 digest from 192.168.1.225(179) to 192.168.1.226(20308) *Aug 21 07:21:09: %T-6-BADAUTH: No MD5 digest from 192.168.1.225(179) to 192.168.1.226(20308) *Aug 21 07:21:14: %T-6-BADAUTH: No MD5 digest from 192.168.1.225(179) to 192.168.1.226(20308) Vail#

The fourth entry shows that the state of interface S1/0—the interface connecting to Taos (192.168.1.225) referred to in Figure 2-27—has changed to Up. After the interface is up, the remaining entries show that Vail is making repeated attempts to open a T connection with Taos on port 179. The attempts are failing, according to the entries, because of an authentication problem. The authentication problem leads to the next new feature in Vail’s configuration: The neighbor statement enables MD5 authentication and specifies a for the neighbor.13 The log entries in Example 2-25 tell you that while Vail is configured for MD5 authentication, Taos is not. If Taos were configured for authentication but its

13

Normally, the s in the displayed configuration, like all other s, would be and should be encrypted. In this example, service -encryption is disabled so that you can read the .

Configuring and Troubleshooting BGP Peering

did not match Vail’s, the entries would state “Invalid MD5 digest” rather than “No MD5 digest.” Each of Vail’s neighbors in Example 2-24 is configured for authentication. As with any IGP, you must authenticate all your IBGP sessions; however, authenticating EBGP sessions is not merely important; it is also essential to the security of your network. The great majority of attempted attacks against routing protocols are against EBGP because that is the protocol exposed to the “outside world” and therefore the most accessible. Never run EBGP without authentication. Example 2-24 shows that all the IBGP neighbors are configured with the same (aLpine), whereas Taos, an external neighbor, has a different (N0rdic). As with your IGP, it is acceptable and istratively easier to use the same for all IBGP sessions; however, each EBGP session should have a unique . Some network operators use the same for multiple EBGP sessions to the same neighboring istrative domain, differing the s only for different domains, but the safest practice is to use a unique for all EBGP sessions regardless of the domain. Another EBGP security feature shown in Vail’s configuration to Taos is neighbor ttl-security. To understand the effects of this statement, compare the highlighted lines in Example 2-26, taken with neighbor ttl-security enabled, with the corresponding lines in Example 2-8, taken for the same neighbor without the feature enabled. Vail’s neighbor database for Taos in Example 2-8 shows the IOS default TTL behavior as discussed in the EBGP multihop case study: The TTL of incoming BGP message packets can be 0 or higher (this is after the local router has decremented the TTL value of the received packet), and the router sets the TTL of BGP message packets it originates to 1. Specifying neighbor 192.168.1.225 ttl-security hops 1 in Vail’s BGP configuration makes two changes to the default behavior, as shown in Example 2-26: ■

The TTL of BGP message packets received from Taos must be 254 or higher (again, as measured after Vail has decremented the TTL value of the received packet) by subtracting the specified allowable hops from 255.

■

The TTL of BGP message packets Vail sends to Taos is set to 255.

Example 2-26 neighbor ttl-security Feature Changes the Acceptable TTL Value of Received EBGP Message Packets and the TTL Value of Transmitted BGP Message Packets Vail#show ip bgp neighbor 192.168.1.225

BGP neighbor is 192.168.1.225,

remote AS 200, external link

BGP version 4, remote router ID 192.168.1.225 BGP state = Established, up for 00:00:31 Last read 00:00:30, last write 00:00:00, hold time is 180, keepalive interval is 60 seconds

139

140

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

Neighbor capabilities: Route refresh: d and received(old & new) Address family IPv4 Unicast: d and received Message statistics: InQ depth is 0 OutQ depth is 0 Sent

Rcvd

Opens:

6

6

Notifications:

0

0

Updates:

0

0

75

77

Keepalives: Route Refresh:

0

0

81

83

Total:

Default minimum time between ment runs is 30 seconds

For address family: IPv4 Unicast BGP table version 1, neighbor version 0/0 Output queue size: 0 Index 2, Offset 0, Mask 0x4 2 update-group member Sent

Rcvd

----

----

Prefixes Current:

0

0

Prefixes Total:

0

0

Implicit Withdraw:

0

0

Explicit Withdraw:

0

0

Used as bestpath:

n/a

0

Used as multipath:

n/a

0

Prefix activity:

Local Policy Denied Prefixes:

Outbound

Inbound

--------

-------

0

0

Total:

Number of NLRIs in the update sent: max 0, min 0

Connections established 6; dropped 5 Last reset 00:00:34, due to reset External BGP neighbor may be up to 1 hop away. Connection state is ESTAB, I/O status: 1, unread input bytes: 0 Connection is ECN Disabled, Mininum incoming TTL 254, Outgoing TTL 255 Local host: 192.168.1.226, Local port: 13408 Foreign host: 192.168.1.225, Foreign port: 179 Connection tableid (VRF): 0

Enqueued packets for retransmit: 0, input: 0

mis-ordered: 0 (0 bytes)

Configuring and Troubleshooting BGP Peering

Event Timers (current time is 0x3D55F8): Timer

Starts

Wakeups

Next

Retrans

4

0

0x0

TimeWait

0

0

0x0

AckHold

2

1

0x0

SendWnd

0

0

0x0

KeepAlive

0

0

0x0

GiveUp

0

0

0x0

PmtuAger

0

0

0x0

DeadWait

0

0

0x0

Linger

0

0

0x0

ProcessQ

0

0

0x0

iss:

379206806

irs: 3498356006

snduna:

379206890

sndnxt:

379206890

sndwnd:

16301

rcvnxt: 3498356109

rcvwnd:

16282

delrcvwnd:

102

SRTT: 206 ms, RTTO: 1891 ms, RTV: 1685 ms, KRTT: 0 ms minRTT: 400 ms, maxRTT: 608 ms, ACK hold: 200 ms Status Flags: active open Option Flags: nagle, md5 IP Precedence value : 6

Datagrams (max data segment is 1440 bytes): Rcvd: 4 (out of order: 0), with data: 2, total data bytes: 102 Sent: 6 (retransmit: 0, fastretransmit: 0, partialack: 0, Second Congestion: 0) with data: 3, total data bytes: 83 Packets received in fast path: 0, fast processed: 0, slow path: 0 fast lock acquisition failures: 0, slow path: 0 Vail#

The default behavior of setting the TTL value to 1 in originated packets ensures that the packets cannot travel beyond a directly connected router. But the default behavior of accepting packets with a TTL of 0 or higher means that a number of attacks can be launched remotely against EBGP; as long as the TTL of originated attack packets is high enough, the packets can traverse many routers and still be accepted by the local router. Authentication prevents BGP from accepting the packets internally, but a flood of invalid packets causing many authentication failures over short periods can break the EBGP session or spike the router’s U, causing BGP to fail or even causing a router crash. By setting the TTL of outbound packets to 255 and accepting only packets with a TTL of 254 or higher, packets cannot be sent to the local BGP process from routers that

141

142

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

are not directly connected.14 A maximum TTL of 255 is decremented to 254 when the packet transits a single router; arriving at the local router it is decremented to 253, which is below the acceptable minimum, and the packet is quietly discarded (that is, discarded without sending an ICMP error message) before reaching the local BGP process. Of course, if you enable a minimum TTL value of 254 with neighbor ttl-security, the neighbor must send BGP message packets with a TTL of 255. So both neighbors must be configured with the feature, or if one of the neighbors is not an IOS router, it must an equivalent feature. Another caveat is that neighbor ttl-security is incompatible with neighbor ebgp-multihop. But you can achieve the same results by adjusting the hops specification of the neighbor ttl-security statement. Table 2-6 compares the use of EBGP-Multihop with that of TTL-Security. Table 2-6

Comparison of EBGP-Multihop and TTL-Security

BGP Message Option

Minimum Acceptable TTL of Incoming BGP Messages

TTL of Outgoing BGP Messages

Default

0 or higher

1

neighbor ebgp-multihop

0 or higher

Specified TTL value

neighbor ttl-security hops

255 – (Specified hops value)

255

Another new statement in the configuration of Example 2-24 is neighbor description. This statement has no functional effect on BGP and merely provides a means of adding a textual description of up to 80 characters to the neighbor address, making the neighbor easier to identify in the configuration. Finally, Example 2-24 includes a configuration for a new neighbor, Whistler, at 192.168.100.10. But Whistler has not yet been installed, so neighbor shutdown prevents Vail from attempting to connect to the non-existent neighbor. The neighbor shutdown statement is useful anytime you want to disable a neighbor connection without deleting its configuration.

Looking Ahead This chapter provided you with a thorough grounding in the configuration and troubleshooting of BGP peering sessions and their underlying T sessions. But you surely have noticed that throughout the chapter, no routing information was actually ed over these sessions. The next chapter introduces you to the basic techniques of sending and receiving routing information over BGP sessions and the application of policies to change how the routing information is used.

14

Securing against remote attacks by manipulating TTL values is called Generalized TTL Security Mechanism (GTSM) and is defined in RFC 3682.

Review Questions

Review Questions 1. What is an untrusted istrative domain, and why is it untrusted? 2. In what way does BGP require you to think differently about peering than an IGP does? 3. What AS numbers are reserved for private use? 4. What are the four BGP message types, and how is each one used? 5. What happens if two BGP neighbors different hold times in their Open messages? 6. What does a negotiated hold time of 0 indicate? 7. What is the IOS default period for sending BGP Keepalive messages? 8. What is the BGP identifier, and how is it selected? 9. In what state or states can BGP peers exchange Update messages? 10. What is NLRI? 11. What is a path attribute? 12. What is a Withdrawn route? 13. What happens when a BGP Notification message is received? 14. What is the difference between the Connect state and the Active state? 15. What causes a transition to the OpenConfirm state, and what are the next steps when the BGP process shows a neighbor in this state? 16. What are the four categories of BGP path attributes? 17. What does well-known mandatory mean, and what are the three well-known mandatory path attributes? 18. What is the purpose of the ORIGIN attribute? 19. What is the purpose of the AS_PATH attribute? 20. When does a router add its AS number to the AS_PATH list of an Update? 21. What is AS path prepending? 22. What are AS_SEQUENCE and AS_SET, and what is the difference between them? 23. What is the purpose of the NEXT_HOP attribute? 24. What is a recursive route lookup, and why is it important to BGP? 25. What happens if a router receives a BGP route with a NEXT_HOP address that is unknown to the router?

143

144

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

26. What are the three parts of a BGP routing information database (RIB), and what is the function of each? 27. What do all the NLRI in a BGP Update message have in common? 28. Does BGP require a T connection between IPv6 addresses to IPv6 prefixes? 29. What is the IOS default TTL value of BGP message packets sent to external peers?

Configuration Exercises Table 2-7 lists the autonomous systems, routers, interfaces, and addresses used in Exercises 1 through 4. All interfaces of the routers are shown; physical interfaces may be changed for your solutions to fit your available resources. For each exercise, if the table indicates that the router has a loopback interface, that interface should be the source of all IBGP connections. EBGP connections should always be between physical interface addresses, unless otherwise specified in an exercise. Neighbor descriptions will always be configured to be the router names. Table 2-7 AS

1

Details for Configuration Exercises 1–4 Router

R1

R2

R3

2

3

R4

R5

Interface

IP Address/Mask

G2/0

10.0.0.1/30

G3/0

10.0.0.5/30

S1/0

172.16.0.1/30

Lo0

192.168.0.1/32

G2/0

10.0.0.2/30

G3/0

10.0.0.9/30

S1/0

172.16.0.5/30

S1/1

172.16.0.9/30

Lo0

192.168.0.2/32

G2/0

172.16.0.10/30

G3/0

172.16.0.6/30

S1/0

fc00::1/64

Lo0

192.168.0.3/32

S1/0

172.16.0.2/30

Lo0

192.168.0.4/32

Lo1

192.168.0.41/32

S1/0

fc00::2/64

Troubleshooting Exercises

AS

Router

4

R6

Interface

IP Address/Mask

Lo0

192.168.0.5/32

S1/0

172.16.0.6/30

S1/1

172.16.0.10/30

Lo0

192.168.0.6/32

1. Configure OSPF as the IGP for AS1. OSPF area 0 spans the whole AS. AS1 internal routes should not be d outside the AS. All point-to-point links over which EBGP is run should not be d into the AS. Then configure the IBGP full mesh for AS1. All IBGP connections will be MD5 authenticated using Ch2_ExcerSizE1. 2. Configure an EBGP peering between R1 in AS1 and R4 in AS2. Authenticate the EBGP peering using Ch2_ExcerSizE2. Set the router-id of R4 manually to be the IP address of Loopback 1. In addition, make sure both routers are secured against remote attacks that are based on manipulating TTL values. 3. Configure EBGP peering between R3 in AS1 and R5 in AS3 using the IPv6 point-topoint physical addresses configured on the routers. Make sure you configure both routers to log all neighbor state changes. 4. Configure EBGP peering between R2 in AS1 and R6 in AS4 such that load balancing is achieved over both physical links. Do not use link aggregation. Use static routing on R2 and R6.

Troubleshooting Exercises 1. Routers R1 and R3 in Figure 2-31 can ping each other’s loopback 0 interfaces. The network operator configures an IBGP peering between both routers, as shown in Example 2-27. However, the IBGP session is not getting established. The command bgp log-neighbor-changes was configured on both routers, and the output from the show logging and the show ip bgp neighbors commands is shown in Example 2-28. What is likely to be preventing the IBGP peering from coming up?

R1

S1/0

Figure 2-31

S1/0

R2

S1/1

S1/1

Topology for Troubleshooting Exercise 1

R3

145

146

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

Example 2-27

Configuring an IBGP Peering Between R1 and R3

! R1 ! router bgp 1 bgp log-neighbor-changes neighbor 192.168.0.3 remote-as 1 neighbor 192.168.0.3 update-source loopback 0 neighbor 192.168.0.3 description R3 neighbor 192.168.0.3 Ch2_Troublesh00ting_ExcerSizE ! _____________________________________________________________ ! R3 ! router bgp 1 bgp log-neighbor-changes neighbor 192.168.0.1 remote-as 1 neighbor 192.168.0.1 update-source loopback 0 neighbor 192.168.0.1 description R1 neighbor 192.168.0.1 Ch2_Troublesh00ting_ExcerSizE !

Example 2-28

show logging and show ip bgp neighbors Output

R1 R1#show logging Syslog logging: enabled (12 messages dropped, 9 messages rate-limited, 0 flushes, 0 overruns, xml disabled, filtering disabled)

No Active Message Discriminator.

No Inactive Message Discriminator.

Console logging: level debugging, 117 messages logged, xml disabled, filtering disabled Monitor logging: level debugging, 0 messages logged, xml disabled, filtering disabled Buffer logging:

level debugging, 126 messages logged, xml disabled, filtering disabled

Logging Exception size (8192 bytes) Count and timestamp logging messages: disabled

Troubleshooting Exercises

Persistent logging: disabled

No active filter modules.

ESM: 0 messages dropped

Trap logging: level informational, 59 message lines logged

Log Buffer (8192 bytes):

*Sep

4 01:21:00.311: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console

*Sep

4 01:21:20.835: BGP: 192.168.0.3 went from Idle to Active

*Sep 4 01:21:20.843: BGP: 192.168.0.3 open active delayed 30866ms (35000ms max, 28% jitter) *Sep

4 01:21:51.711: BGP: 192.168.0.3 open active, local address 192.168.0.1

*Sep 4 01:21:51.891: BGP: 192.168.0.3 open failed: Destination unreachable; gateway or host down, open active delayed 31701ms (35000ms max, 28% jitter) *Sep

4 01:22:23.595: BGP: 192.168.0.3 open active, local address 192.168.0.1

R1#show ip bgp neighbors BGP neighbor is 192.168.0.3,

remote AS 1, internal link

BGP version 4, remote router ID 0.0.0.0 BGP state = Active Last read 00:03:33, last write 00:03:33, hold time is 180, keepalive interval is 60 seconds Message statistics: InQ depth is 0 OutQ depth is 0 Sent

Rcvd

Opens:

0

0

Notifications:

0

0

Updates:

0

0

Keepalives:

0

0

Route Refresh:

0

0

Total:

0

0

Default minimum time between ment runs is 0 seconds

For address family: IPv4 Unicast BGP table version 1, neighbor version 0/0 Output queue size: 0 Index 1, Offset 0, Mask 0x2 1 update-group member Sent

Rcvd

147

148

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

Prefix activity:

----

----

Prefixes Current:

0

0

Prefixes Total:

0

0

Implicit Withdraw:

0

0

Explicit Withdraw:

0

0

Used as bestpath:

n/a

0

Used as multipath:

n/a

0

Local Policy Denied Prefixes:

Outbound

Inbound

--------

-------

0

0

Total:

Number of NLRIs in the update sent: max 0, min 0

Connections established 0; dropped 0 Last reset never No active T connection _______________________________________________________________________ R3 R3#show logging Syslog logging: enabled (12 messages dropped, 9 messages rate-limited, 0 flushes, 0 overruns, xml disabled, filtering disabled)

No Active Message Discriminator.

No Inactive Message Discriminator.

Console logging: level debugging, 115 messages logged, xml disabled, filtering disabled Monitor logging: level debugging, 0 messages logged, xml disabled, filtering disabled Buffer logging:

level debugging, 124 messages logged, xml disabled, filtering disabled

Logging Exception size (8192 bytes) Count and timestamp logging messages: disabled Persistent logging: disabled

No active filter modules.

ESM: 0 messages dropped

Trap logging: level informational, 55 message lines logged

Troubleshooting Exercises

Log Buffer (8192 bytes):

*Sep

4 01:20:55.003: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console

*Sep

4 01:21:28.723: BGP: 192.168.0.1 went from Idle to Active

*Sep 4 01:21:28.731: BGP: 192.168.0.1 open active delayed 34023ms (35000ms max, 28% jitter) *Sep

4 01:22:02.755: BGP: 192.168.0.1 open active, local address 192.168.0.3

*Sep 4 01:22:02.811: BGP: 192.168.0.1 open failed: Destination unreachable; gateway or host down, open active delayed 25843ms (35000ms max, 28% jitter) *Sep

4 01:22:28.655: BGP: 192.168.0.1 open active, local address 192.168.0.3

*Sep 4 01:22:28.831: BGP: 192.168.0.1 open failed: Destination unreachable; gateway or host down, open active delayed 27833ms (35000ms max, 28% jitter) *Sep

4 01:22:56.667: BGP: 192.168.0.1 open active, local address 192.168.0.3

*Sep 4 01:22:56.859: BGP: 192.168.0.1 open failed: Destination unreachable; gateway or host down, open active delayed 33383ms (35000ms max, 28% jitter)

R3#show ip bgp neighbors BGP neighbor is 192.168.0.1,

remote AS 1, internal link

BGP version 4, remote router ID 0.0.0.0 BGP state = Active Last read 00:03:57, last write 00:03:57, hold time is 180, keepalive interval is 60 seconds Message statistics: InQ depth is 0 OutQ depth is 0 Sent

Rcvd

Opens:

0

0

Notifications:

0

0

Updates:

0

0

Keepalives:

0

0

Route Refresh:

0

0

Total:

0

0

Default minimum time between ment runs is 0 seconds

For address family: IPv4 Unicast BGP table version 1, neighbor version 0/0 Output queue size: 0 Index 1, Offset 0, Mask 0x2 1 update-group member Sent

Rcvd

----

----

Prefixes Current:

0

0

Prefixes Total:

0

0

Implicit Withdraw:

0

0

Explicit Withdraw:

0

0

Prefix activity:

149

150

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

Used as bestpath:

n/a

0

Used as multipath:

n/a

0

Local Policy Denied Prefixes:

Outbound

Inbound

--------

-------

0

0

Total:

Number of NLRIs in the update sent: max 0, min 0

Connections established 0; dropped 0 Last reset never No active T connection

2. Refer to Figure 2-32. R1 and R2 have been configured to establish an IBGP connection, but the connection is not coming up. Upon inspecting the logging buffer, the logs in Example 2-29 were found. Why is the IBGP session not coming up?

R1

S1/0

Figure 2-32

S1/0

R2

Topology for Troubleshooting Exercise 2

Example 2-29

Logs Lack an IBGP Session

R1# *Sep 4 02:49:20.575: BGP: 192.168.0.2 open failed: Connection timed out; remote host not responding, open active delayed 457ms (1000ms max, 87% jitter) *Sep

4 02:49:21.035: BGP: 192.168.0.2 open active, local address 192.168.0.1

R1# *Sep 4 02:49:21.287: %T-6-BADAUTH: No MD5 digest from 192.168.0.2(179) to 192.168.0.1(43661)

3. In an attempt to rectify the problem in Exercise 2, the network operator changed the BGP configuration on one of the routers. Now he receives the log messages shown in Example 2-30. Why is the IBGP session not coming up, and what is the difference between the log messages in this exercise and Exercise 2? Example 2-30

Logs Still Missing an IBGP Session

R1# *Sep R1#

4 02:51:16.003: BGP: 192.168.0.2 open active, local address 192.168.0.1

Troubleshooting Exercises

*Sep 4 02:51:21.007: BGP: 192.168.0.2 open failed: Connection timed out; remote host not responding, open active delayed 30634ms (35000ms max, 28% jitter) R1# *Sep 4 02:51:21.739: %T-6-BADAUTH: Invalid MD5 digest from 192.168.0.2(28677) to 192.168.0.1(179)

4. In Figure 2-33, routers R1 and R2 are in AS1. R3 is in AS2. OSPF is the IGP for AS1 and area 0 spans the whole AS. Routers R1 and R2 have been configured to peer over their loopback addresses. R1 peers with R3 over the physical link addresses. The configurations for all three routers are listed in Example 2-31. Interface Loopback0 of R3 (192.168.0.3) is shown in the output of show ip bgp on router R2, but the route is not being installed in the IP routing table. What is the reason for this? And what are two ways to fix this issue, and which method is considered to be best practice configuration?

ASN 1 S1/1

S1/0

S1/0

R1

R2

ASN 2 S1/1 R3

Figure 2-33

Topology for Troubleshooting Exercise 4

Example 2-31

Router Configurations for Troubleshooting Exercise 4

! R1 ! interface Serial1/0 ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.252 ! interface Serial1/1 ip address 172.16.0.1 255.255.255.252 ! interface Loopback 0 ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.255

151

152

Chapter 2: Introduction to BGP

! router ospf 1 log-adjacency-changes network 10.0.0.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 network 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 ! router bgp 1 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes neighbor 192.168.0.2 remote-as 1 neighbor 192.168.0.2 update-source Loopback0 neighbor 172.16.0.2 remote-as 2 no auto-summary ! _______________________________________________ ! R2 ! interface Serial1/0 ip address 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.252 ! interface Loopback 0 ip address 192.168.0.2 255.255.255.255 ! router ospf 1 log-adjacency-changes network 10.0.0.2 0.0.0.0 area 0 network 192.168.0.2 0.0.0.0 area 0 ! router bgp 1 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes neighbor 192.168.0.1 remote-as 1 neighbor 192.168.0.1 update-source Loopback0 no auto-summary ! _______________________________________________ ! R3 ! interface Serial1/1 ip address 172.16.0.2 255.255.255.252 ! interface Loopback 0 ip address 192.168.0.3 255.255.255.255 !

Troubleshooting Exercises

router bgp 2 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes network 192.168.0.3 mask 255.255.255.255 neighbor 172.16.0.1 remote-as 1 no auto-summary !

5. Reference Figure 2-33 in Exercise 4. The network operator fixed the problem that was stopping the bgp route from being installed in the IP routing table on R2. Now the route is in both the BGP table and the IP routing table. However, the ping from R2 to R3 is still not successful. What may be the reason for this and how would you fix it?

153

This page intentionally left blank

Index Symbols 4-byte AS numbers, scaling BGP network, 574-575 16-bit AS numbers, 2

A AA:NN Format, scaling BGP, 443-445 A (Address) records, 949 acceptable use policies (AUP), 36 accept-route-policy-rt statement, 419 access loss, redundancy schemes, 34 Acquire state (EGP neighbors), 6 Acquisition Confirm message, 6 Acquisition Request message, 6 active EGP neighbors, 8 Active state (BGP finite state machine), 89 adding communities (scaling BGP), 460-471 additional-paths statement, 419 Additional section, DNS message format, 950 additive keyword, 463 ADD-PATHS capability, PIC, 528-538

Address (A) records, 949 address families, IPv6, 22 configuration, 524 MBGP , 618-619 Address Family Identifier (AFI), 616, 895 Address Family Information, 895 address-family ipv4 multicast command, 904 address-family ipv4 unicast command, 904 address-family ipv6 statement, 623 address migration, NAT44 operation, 937-938 address overloading, 940-942 address portability, CIDR and, 58-59 address prefixes, 43 address translation tables, NAT44, 934 Adjacency tables, 539 Adj-RIBs-In, 100 Adj-RIBs-Out, 101 istrative domains, autonomous systems (AS), 1 istrative scoping, 765-766, 881-882 -map option, aggregate-address statement, 217-218 -map statement, 419

1080

ment-interval statement

ment-interval statement, 419 statement, 419 advertising BGP NLRI local AS, 182 redistributing BGP NLRI into the IGP, 182 route aggregation with BGP, 198 aggregate-address statement, 201-206 AS_SET attribute, 210-218 ATOMIC_AGGREGATE and AGGREGATOR attributes, 207-209 static routes, 199-200 AFI (Address Family Identifier), 616, 895 African Network Information Centre (AfriNIC), 54 AfriNIC (African Network Information Centre), 54 aggregate-address command, 581 aggregate-address statement, 102, 199-206 aggregation, 199, 558 AGGREGATOR attribute, 207-209 ALG (DNS Application Level Gateway), 964 All-Nodes multicast group, IPv6 multicast addresses, 722 allowas-in statement, 414, 419 ALLOW_NEW_SOURCES (Type 5) source-list-record change format, 741 allow-policy statement, 419 American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN), 54 Announce messages, RP, 790 Answers section, DNS message format, 950 Anycast RP, 917-923 Any-Source Multicast (ASM) service model, 761

APNIC (Asia-Pacific Network Information Centre), 54 arbitrary communities, scaling BGP, 434-443 ARIN (American Registry for Internet Numbers), 54 ARPANET, 1 AS (autonomous system) numbers, scaling BGP network, 2 4-byte AS numbers, 574-575 confederations, 576-592 IBGP and the n-squared problem, 575-576 prepended, 93 private AS numbers, 569-574 route reflectors, 592-606 AS (autonomous systems), 1 BGP (Border Gateway Protocol), 1 configuring and troubleshooting peering, 110-142 connecting to multiple external neighbors, 77-79 decision process, 100-103 finite state machine, 87-90 message formats, 103-108 message types, 85-87 path attributes, 90-100 setting routing policy, 79-82 trust issues, 82-84 configuring NAT44, 975-980 multihomed systems, 29 load sharing and load balancing, 36-37 multiple systems, 79 NAT44 operation, 938-939 provider-assigned (PA) addressing, 40 routing policies, 36 stub AS, 31-36 traffic control, 37 transit AS, 30-31 stub versus transit, 21-22

autonomous systems (AS) 1081

AS_CONFED_SEQUENCE attribute, 94, 577 AS_CONFED_SET attribute, 94, 577 Asia-Pacific Network Information Centre (APNIC), 54 ASM (Any-Source Multicast) service model, 761 as-override statement, 419 AS_PATH access lists, MBGP policy configuration identifying prefixes, 672 policy and session templates, 677-685, 701 AS_PATH attributes, 17-20 AS_CONFED_SEQUENCE, 577 AS_CONFED_SET, 577 AS_PATHLIMIT BGP route attribute, 68 AS_PATH path attribute (BGP), 92-97 AS_SEQUENCE (AS_PATH attribute), 94 Assert messages PIMv2 format, 815 PIMv2 routers Encoded Group Address field, 816 Encoded Unicast Source Address field, 816 Metric field, 816 Metric Preference field, 816 AS_SET attribute, route aggregation, 94, 210-218 as-set keyword, 214, 581 asg IPv4 address blocks, CIDR, 54-56 asymmetric traffic, 38 Asynchronous mode (BFD), 513 ATOMIC_AGGREGATE attribute, route aggregation, 207-209 attributes communities, 425-428 COMMUNITY path, NO_EXPORT option, 203 MBGP (Multiprotocol BGP), 616-618 MED, 177, 585

memory utilization, 558 MULTI_EXIT_DISC (MED), 159 route aggregation AS_SET, 210-218 ATOMIC_AGGREGATE AGGREGATOR, 207-209 Attribute Type codes, 106 Attribute Values, 106 AUP (acceptable use policies), 36 authentication keychain command, 522 authoritative servers (DNS), 949 Authority section, DNS message format, 950 automatic summarization, 163-166 autonomous system (AS) numbers, scaling BGP network, 2 confederations, 576-592 IBGP and the n-squared problem, 575-576 prepended, 93 private AS numbers, 569-574 route reflectors, 592-606 autonomous systems (AS), 1 BGP (Border Gateway Protocol), 1 configuring and troubleshooting peering, 110-142 connecting to multiple external neighbors, 77-79 decision process, 100-103 finite state machine, 87-90 message formats, 103-108 message types, 85-87 path attributes, 90-100 setting routing policy, 79-82 trust issues, 82-84 configuring NAT44, 975-980 multihomed systems, 29 load sharing and load balancing, 36-37 multiple systems, 79 NAT44 operation, 938-939 provider-assigned (PA) addressing, 40

1082

autonomous systems (AS)

routing policies, 36 stub AS, 31-36 traffic control, 37 transit AS, 30-31 stub versus transit, 21-22 Auto-RP protocol, 789-790, 837-845 Auxiliary Data field (IGMPv3 Group Record), 741 Auxiliary Data Length field (IGMPv3 Group Record), 741

B backward compatibility, IPv6 to IPv4, 996 bandwidth, multihoming benefits, 36 B (Border bit) field, PIMv2 messages, 811 BFD (Bidirectional Forwarding Detection), 512-523 bfd echo command, 514 bfd interval min_rx multiplier command, 514 bfd map ipv4 command, 523 bfd slow-timers command, 514 bfd template command, 523 bfd-template multi-hop command, 523 BFD templates, 522-523 bfd-template single-hop command, 522 BG identifiers, Open messages, 86 BGMP (Border Gateway Multicast Protocol), 717 BGP-1, 16 BGP-2, 16 BGP-3, 16 BGP-4, 16 bgp additional-paths install command, 524 bgp additional-paths select all statement, 534 bgp additional-paths select best statement, 534

bgp additional-paths select group-best statement, 534 bgp additional-paths statement, 534 bgp always-compare-med statement, 591 bgp best path compare-routerid statement, 102 bgp bestpath med confed statement, 592 BGP (Border Gateway Protocol), 1, 16 advertising BGP NLRI into the local AS, 182 advertising a default route to a neighboring AS distributing NLRI in a stub AS with IBGP, 184-192 distributing NLRI in a stub AS with static routes, 193-198 redistributing BGP NLRI into the IGP, 182 AS_PATH attribute, 17-20 configuring and troubleshooting peering, 110 BGP connection security case study, 136-142 EBGP multihop case study, 127-135 EBGP peering case study, 110-118 IBGP peering case study, 118-127 configuring NLRI, 155 injecting prefixes with redistribution, 162-167 injecting prefixes with the network mask statement, 160-161 injecting prefixes with the network statement, 156-160 connecting to multiple external neighbors, 77-79 decision process, 100-103 external versus internal BGP, 22-29 finite state machine, 87 Active state, 89 Connect state, 89 Established state, 90

Bootstrap messages 1083

Idle state, 88 input events, 88 OpenConfirm state, 90 OpenSent state, 89 IBGP (Internal Border Gateway Protocol), NLRI and, 167-182 MBGP (Multiprotocol BGP), 615 attributes, 616-618 configuring for IPv6, 619-705 for IPv6 address family, 618-619 message formats, 103 Keepalive messages, 108 Notification messages, 108 Open messages, 104 Update messages, 105-106 message types, 85 Keepalive messages, 86 Notification messages, 87 Open messages, 85-86 Route Refresh messages, 85 Update messages, 86-87 path attributes, 90 AS_PATH, 92-97 NEXT_HOP, 97-100 ORIGIN, 92 Weight, 100 route aggregation, 198 aggregate-address statement, 201-206 AS_SET attribute, 210-218 ATOMIC_AGGREGATE and AGGREGATOR attributes, 207-209 static routes, 199-200 scaling, 401-402 BGP network, 569-606 configuration scaling tools, 402-478 functions, 478-569 setting routing policy, 79-82 trust issues, 82-84

vector protocol, 17 versions, 16-17 bgp cluster-id command, 602 bgp confederation identifier command, 579 bgp confederation peers command, 580 BGP Confederations, 94 BGP convergence PIC (Prefix Independent Convergence), 523-538 bgp dampening command, 480 bgp deterministic-med statement, 591 bgp graceful-restart command, 540 BGP Identifier field, BGP Open messages, 105 bgp log-neighbor-changes statement, 137 BGP NEXT_HOP behavior, 177 bgp nexthop trigger delay 0 command, 506 bgp nexthop trigger delay statement, 498 bgp recursion host command, 526 bgp router-id statement, 136 bgp router mode command, 498 BGP Selection Process, 484 bgp suppress-inactive statement, 166 bgp upgrade-cli command, 629-631 BGP version number, Open messages, 85 Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD), 512-523 Bidirectional PIM (Bidir-PIM), 754, 771 bidirectional trees, 796 Bidir-PM (Bidirectional PIM), 754, 771 bilateral peering agreements, 30 BLOCK_OLD_SOURCES (Type 6) source-list- record change format, 741 bmp-activate statement, 414 Bootstrap messages, 788 PIMv2 format, 814-815 PIMv2 routers BSR Priority field, 814 Encoded Multicast Group Address field, 814

1084

Bootstrap messages

Encoded Unicast BSR Address field, 814 Encoded Unicast RP Address field, 815 Fragment RP Count field, 815 Fragment Tag field, 814 Hash Mask Length field, 814 RP Count field, 814 RP Holdtime field, 815 RP Priority field, 815 bootstrap protocol, 787-789, 849-855 bootstrap router (BSR), 788 Border Gateway Multicast Protocol (BGMP), 717 Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), 1, 16 advertising BGP NLRI into the local AS, 182 advertising a default route to a neighboring AS distributing NLRI in a stub AS with IBGP, 184-192 distributing NLRI in a stub AS with static routes, 193-198 redistributing BGP NLRI into the IGP, 182 AS_PATH attribute, 17-20 configuring and troubleshooting peering, 110 BGP connection security case study, 136-142 EBGP multihop case study, 127-135 EBGP peering case study, 110-118 IBGP peering case study, 118-127 configuring NLRI, 155 injecting prefixes with redistribution, 162-167 injecting prefixes with the network mask statement, 160-161 injecting prefixes with the network statement, 156-160 connecting to multiple external neighbors, 77-79 decision process, 100-103

external versus internal BGP, 22-29 finite state machine, 87 Active state, 89 Connect state, 89 Established state, 90 Idle state, 88 input events, 88 OpenConfirm state, 90 OpenSent state, 89 IBGP (Internal Border Gateway Protocol), NLRI and, 167-182 MBGP (Multiprotocol BGP), 615 attributes, 616-618 configuring for IPv6, 619-705 for IPv6 address family, 618-619 message formats, 103 Keepalive messages, 108 Notification messages, 108 Open messages, 104 Update messages, 105-106 message types, 85 Keepalive messages, 86 Notification messages, 87 Open messages, 85-86 Route Refresh messages, 85 Update messages, 86-87 path attributes, 90 AS_PATH, 92-97 NEXT_HOP, 97-100 ORIGIN, 92 Weight, 100 route aggregation, 198 aggregate-address statement, 201-206 AS_SET attribute, 210-218 ATOMIC_AGGREGATE and AGGREGATOR attributes, 207-209 static routes, 199-200

classful routing 1085

scaling, 401-402 BGP network, 569-606 configuration scaling tools, 402-478 functions, 478-569 setting routing policy, 79-82 trust issues, 82-84 vector protocol, 17 versions, 16-17 broadcast-and-prune protocols, 758 broadcasting, 713

CGMP (Cisco Group Management Protocol) messages, 819 CGMP packets, 749-752 CHANGE_TO_EXCLUDE_MODE (Type 4) filter-mode-change record format, 741 CHANGE_TO_INCLUDE_MODE (Type 3) filter-mode-change record format, 741 Checksum field IGMPv2 message format, 737

BSR (bootstrap router), 788 BSR Priority field, PIMv2 Bootstrap messages, 814 buffer small permanent statement, 569 BUM frames, 746

MLDv1 messages, 743 PIMv2 message header, 810 PIMv2 messages, 811 checksums, NAT44 operation, 945 CIDR blocks, 40, 53 CIDR (classless inter-domain routing), 16, 41 address portability, 58-59 asg IPv4 address blocks, 54-56 classless routing, 43-47 limitations, 62-66 multihoming and provider-assigned addresses, 56-58 NAT resolution for multihomed environments, 939 provider-independent addresses, 59-60 reducing Class B address space depletion, 50 reducing routing table explosion, 50-53 summarization, 41-50 traffic engineering, 60-62 CIDR Report, 198 Cisco Group Management Protocol (CGMP), 749-753 Cisco Group Management Protocol (CGMP) messages, 819 Class B addresses, reducing depletion (CIDR), 50 Class D IPv4 addresses, multicast routing, 717-721 classful routing, 43

C candidate bootstrap routers (C-BSRs), 788, 849 Candidate-RP-ment messages PIMv2 format, 817 PIMv2 routers Encoded Group Address field, 817 Encoded Unicast RP Address field, 817 Holdtime field, 817 Prefix Count field, 817 Priority field, 817 Candidate RPs (C-RPs), 788, 838 Canonical Name (CNAME) records, 949 Capability field (ORF), 495 capability orf prefix-list statement, 419 capability statement, 419 Catalyst’s CAM table, 750 C-BSRs (candidate bootstrap routers), 788, 849 CBT (Core-Based Trees), 754, 771-772 CGMP (Cisco Group Management Protocol), 749-753

1086

classless inter-domain routing (CIDR)

classless inter-domain routing (CIDR), 16, 41 address portability, 58-59 asg IPv4 address blocks, 54-56 classless routing, 43-47 limitations, 62-66 multihoming and provider-assigned addresses, 56-58 NAT resolution for multihomed environments, 939 provider-independent addresses, 59-60 reducing Class B address space depletion, 50 reducing routing table explosion, 50-53 summarization, 41-50 traffic engineering, 60-62 clear ip bgp 10.0.0.2 in prefix-filter command, 490 clear ip bgp dampening command, 483 clear ip bgp flap-statistics command, 483 clear ip bgp {ip-address} command, 542 clear ip nat translations command, 988 clear ipv6 nat translation command, 1017 clients (IBGP), route reflection clusters, 593 cluster-id attribute, 561 cluster-id statement, 414 CLUSTER_LIST attribute, route reflection clusters, 596 clusters, route reflection, 593 CLUSTER_LIST attribute, 596 configuration, 600-605 fully meshed clusters, 596 interconnecting links, 606 nested clusters, 595 ORIGINATOR_ID attribute, 595 peering relationship, 594 redundancy, 596-603 CNAME (Canonical Name) records, 949 Code field, MLDv1 messages, 743 codes (ICMP), IPv4 to IPv6 translation, 1002

commands. See also statements address-family ipv4 multicast, 904 address-family ipv4 unicast, 904 aggregate-address, 581 authentication {authentication-type} keychain {keychain-name}, 522 bfd echo, 514 bfd interval {milliseconds} min_rx {milliseconds} multiplier {multiplier-value}, 514 bfd map ipv4, 523 bfd slow-timers, 514 bfd template, 523 bfd-template multi-hop, 523 bfd-template single-hop, 522 bgp additional-paths install, 524 bgp cluster-id, 602 bgp confederation identifier, 579 bgp confederation peers, 580 bgp dampening, 480 bgp graceful-restart, 540 bgp nexthop trigger delay 0, 506 bgp recursion host, 526 bgp router mode, 498 bgp upgrade-cli, 629-631 clear ip bgp 10.0.0.2 in prefix-filter, 490 clear ip bgp dampening, 483 clear ip bgp flap-statistics, 483 clear ip bgp {ip-address}, 542 clear ip nat translations, 988 clear ipv6 nat translation, 1017 dampening, 522 debug, 864 debug bgp ipv6 unicast updates in, 624 debug ip bgp, 110 debug ip bgp rib-filter, 503 debug ip bgp updates, 488, 546 debug ip egp transactions, 7-8 debug ip packet detail, 774 debug ip pim auto-rp, 840 debug ipv6 nat detail, 1014

commands 1087

echo, 522 exit-address-family, 904 ha-mode graceful-restart, 540 IGMP (Internet Group Management Protocol), 818-819 interval min-tx {milliseconds} min-rx {milliseconds} multiplier {multiplier-value}, 522 ip cgmp, 819 ip cgmp proxy, 819 ip default-gateway, 961 ip igmp version, 730, 818 ip mroute, 861 ip msdp cache-sa-state, 897, 911 ip msdp default-peer, 923 ip msdp filter-sa-request, 912 ip msdp mesh-group, 915 ip msdp originator-id, 918 ip msdp peer, 908 ip msdp redistribute, 912 ip msdp sa-filter in, 912 ip msdp sa-filter out, 912 ip msdp sa-request, 898 ip msdp ttl-threshold, 912 ip multicast boundary, 882 ip multicast-routing, 818 ip multicast ttl-threshold, 881 ip nat inside, 956 ip nat inside source static, 957 ip nat outside, 956 ip nat outside source static, 958 ip nat translation max-entries, 987 ip nat translation timeout, 936, 968, 987 ip pim bsr-candidate, 814, 850, 854 ip pim dense-mode, 819-821 ip pim message-interval, 795 ip pim query-interval, 773 ip pim rp-address 10.224.1.1, 830 ip pim rp-candidate, 850 ip pim send-rp-announce, 838-841 ip pim send-rp-announce group-list, 849

ip pim sparse-dense-mode, 847 ip pim sparse-mode, 829 ip pim spt-threshold, 806, 835 ip pim version, 809 ip routing, 818 match interface, 978 match ip next-hop, 978 maximm-paths, 20 mrinfo, 865-867 mstat, 869-872 mtrace, 867-869 neighbor 192.168.1.253 route-map COMMUNITY out, 203 neighbor {IP_Address} capability orf prefix-list, 489 neighbor {IP-Address} fall-over bfd, 523 neighbor {IP-Address} ha-mode graceful-restart, 540 neighbor next-hop-self, 581 no address-family ipv4, 652 no bgp client-to-client reflection, 606 no bgp fast-external-fallover, 510 no bgp nexthop trigger enable, 498 no ip default ipv4-unicast, 906 no ip mroute-cache, 819 no ip routing, 961 ow ip bgp rib-failure, 165 PASV, 952 PORT, 952 redistribute connected, 175 show, 864 show bfd neighbors [details], 515 show bgp, 634 show bgp all, 645 show bgp all community, 672 show bgp all summary, 644 show bgp ipv4 unicast, 635 show bgp ipv4 unicast update-group, 556 show bgp ipv6 unicast, 634, 672 show bgp summary, 120 show buffers, 569

1088

commands

show interfaces, 569 show ip bgp, 19-20, 158, 434, 467, 506, 526 show ip bgp 10.4.2.0, 467 show ip bgp 192.168.255.1 neighbor d-routes, 530 show ip bgp community, 436-440, 467 show ip bgp community-list, 441-443 show ip bgp community no-export, 204, 217 show ip bgp dampened-paths, 482-483 show ip bgp flap-statistics, 482-483 show ip bgp ipv4, 905 show ip bgp ipv6 unicast community, 687 show ip bgp neighbor, 112, 490 show ip bgp neighbors {IP-Address}, 543 show ip bgp peer-groups, 407 show ip bgp replication, 556 show ip bgp rib-failures, 190 show ip bgp summary, 120, 506, 556 show ip bgp template peer-policy, 422-424 show ip bgp template peer-session, 416-417 show ip bgp update-group, 172, 410-411 show ip bgp update-group summary, 411-413 show ip cef {ip-address}{mask} detail, 526 show ip dvmrp route, 888 show ip igmp group, 777 show ip igmp interface, 827 show ip mroute, 776, 821, 864 show ip msdp peer, 910 show ip nat statistics, 988 show ip nat translations verbose, 968 show ip pim bsr-router, 851 show ip pim neighbor, 775 show ip pim rp, 837, 841 show ip pim rp-hash, 844, 855 show ip pim rp mapping, 793, 843 show ip pim rp mapping in-use, 844

show ip route, 821, 864 show ip route bgp, 653 show ip route repair-paths, 526 show ip route summary, 556 show ip spd, 569 show ipv6 interface, 647 show ipv6 nat translations, 1013 show ipv6 route, 624, 634 show ipv6 route bgp, 653 show logging, 137 show processes u, 552-556 show processes memory, 556 timers bgp, 20 timers egp, 8 w ip pim interface, 832 communities MBGP policy configuration, identifying prefixes, 667-672 scaling BGP, 425 AA(colon)NN Format, 443-445 adding/deleting communities, 460-471 arbitrary communities, 434-443 expanded community lists, 445-460 extended community lists, 472-478 well-known communities, 426-433 community lists, 438, 445-460, 472-478 COMMUNITY path attribute, NO_EXPORT option, 203 concepts, NAT44 operation, 932-934 confederation EBGP, 576 confederation IDs, 576 confederations, scaling BGP network, 576-592 configuration scaling tools (BGP), 402 communities, 425 adding/deleting communities, 460-471 arbitrary communities, 434-445 expanded community lists, 445-460

Count field, CGMP packet format 1089

extended community lists, 472-478 well-known communities, 426-433 peer groups, 403-413 peer templates, 413 policy templates, 419-425 session templates, 414-418 configuring BFD slow timers, 514, 519-520 BGP peering, 110 BGP connection security case study, 136-142 EBGP multihop case study, 127-135 EBGP peering case study, 110-114 EBGP peering over IPv6 case study, 114-118 IBGP peering case study, 118-127 communities, 425 IP multicast routing, 817 multicast load sharing, 856-862 PIM-DM (Protocol Independent Multicast-Dense Mode), 819-828 PIM-SM (Protocol Independent Multicast-Sparse Mode), 828-855 MBGP, 902-908 MBGP for IPv6, 619 case study, 666-705 dual stack MBGP connection, 642-647 IPv4 and IPv6 over an IPv6 T connection, 631-641 Ipv4 and IPv6 prefixes over an IPv4 T session, 620-628 mixed IPv4 and IPv6 sessions, 650-653 multihop dual stack MBGP connection, 647-650 Multiprotocol IBGP, 654-666 upgrading IPv4 BGP configurations to the address family format, 629-631

MSDP, 908-913 NAT44, 955 dynamic NAT case study, 964-969 ISP multihoming case study, 975-980 network merger case study, 969-975 PAT (Port Address Translation) case study, 980-982 service distribution case study, 984-986 static NAT case study, 955-962 T load balancing case study, 982-984 NAT-PT (Network Address Translation with Port Translation), 1010-1028 NLRI in BGP, 155 injecting prefixes with redistribution, 162-167 injecting prefixes with the network mask statement, 160-161 injecting prefixes with the network statement, 156-160 route reflection clusters, 600-605 stateful NAT64, 1041 stateless NAT64, 1036 connections (BGP), multiple externa neighbors, 77-79 ConnectRetry timer, 88 Connect state (BGP finite state machine), 89 conservation of IP addresses, NAT44 operation, 934-937 continue clauses, BGP policy configuration, 403 convergence of BGP, PIC (Prefix Independent Convergence), 523-538 Core-Based Trees (CBTs), 754, 771-772 core gateways, 4 core (shared router), 760 Cornell ISIS Project, IPv4 multicast address, 719 Count field, CGMP packet format, 753

1090

U utilization, scaling BGP

U utilization, scaling BGP, 552-556 C-RPs (Candidate RPs), 788, 838 Current-State Record field, IGMPv3 Group Record, 741

D dampening command, 522 Data field;BGP Notification messages, 108 dCEF (distributed CEF), 539 dead neighbors (EGP), 10 de-aggregation, 57 debug bgp ipv6 unicast updates in command, 624 debug capture, PIM messages, 773 debug commands, 864 debug ip bgp command, 110 debug ip bgp rib-filter command, 503 debug ip bgp updates command, 488, 546 debug ip egp transactions command, 7-8 debug ip packet detail command, 774 debug ip pim auto-rp command, 840 debug ipv6 nat detail command, 1014 decision process, BGP (Border Gateway Protocol), 100-103 default-metric statement, 159 default-originate statement, 419, 702 default peers, MSDP (Multicast Source Discovery Protocol), 923-925 default routes, 182, 196-198 default statement, 414, 419 deleting communities, scaling BGP, 460-471 Demand mode (BFD), 513 dense topologies, multicast routing, 757 depletion of Class B addresses, reducing with CIDR, 50 description statement, 414 designated router (Querier), 728-729 designated routers (DR), PIM-DM (Protocol Independent Multicast-Dense Mode), 782

destination addresses, reports, 728 detecting failures BFD (Bidirectional Forwarding Detection). See BFD Fast External Fallover. See Fast External Fallover DF (Don’t Fragment) bit set, 564 disable-connected-check statement, 414 discontiguous range of addresses, configuring NAT, 980 Discovery messages, RP, 790 Distance Vector Multicast Routing Protocol (DVMRP), 754, 771-772 distance vector protocols, 17 distributed CEF (dCEF), 539 distribute-list statement, 419 dmzlink-bw statement, 419 DNS Application Level Gateway (ALG), 964 DNS (Domain Name System), NAT44 operation, 948-951 DNS message format, 950-951 Domain Name System (DNS), NAT44 operation, 948-951 domains, sparsely populated, 716 Don’t Fragment (DF) bit set, 564 Down state (EGP neighbors), 6 downstream interface, 755-756 DR (designated routers), PIM-DM (Protocol Independent Multicast-Dense Mode), 782 dual Route Processors (RP), 539 dual-stacked interfaces, 997 dual stack MBGP connection, 642-647 DVMRP (Distance Vector Multicast Routing Protocol), 754, 771-772 Graft messages, 888 networks, multicast routing, 888-891 Probe messages, 888-889 Prune messages, 889-890 Report messages, 888 dynamic entries, NAT44, 934

exterior EGP neighbors 1091

dynamic NAT, 964-969 dynamic one-to-one mapping, 1041 dynamic port mapping, 1041 dynamic update peer groups, 407-413

E EBGP (external Border Gateway Protocol), 22-29 peering case study, 110-114, 127-135 peering over IPv6 case study, 114-118 ebgp-multihop statement, 414 echo command, 522 Echo function (BFD), 513-514 EGP (Exterior Gateway Protocol), 1 functions, 5 Neighbor Acquisition Protocol, 6-8 Neighbor Reachability Protocol, 8-10 Network Reachability Protocol, 10-15 limitations, 15-16 neighbors (peers), 3-4 origins, 2-3 topology, 3-5 EIGRP (Enhanced IGRP), 3 Embedded RP, 787-793 Encoded Group Address field PIMv2 Assert messages, 816 PIMv2 Candidate-RP-ment messages, 817 PIMv2 Stop messages, 812 Encoded ed Source Address field, PIMv2 /Prune messages, 813 Encoded Multicast Group Address field PIMv2 Bootstrap messages, 814 PIMv2 /Prune messages, 813 Encoded Pruned Source Address field, PIMv2 /Prune messages, 814 Encoded Unicast BSR Address field, PIMv2 Bootstrap messages, 814

Encoded Unicast RP Address field PIMv2 Bootstrap messages, 815 PIMv2 Candidate-RP-ment messages, 817 Encoded Unicast Source Address field PIMv2 Assert messages, 816 PIMv2 Stop messages, 812 Encoded Unicast Upstream Neighbor Address field, PIMv2 /Prune messages, 813 encryption, NAT44 operation, 945 Enhanced IGRP (EIGRP), 3 Entry-Count field, MSDP Source Active TLV format, 898 Error Code field, BGP Notification messages, 108 error codes, 108 Error Subcode field, BGP Notification messages, 108 error subcodes, 108 established keyword, 952 Established state (BGP finite state machine), 90 Ethernet networks, multicast addresses, 720 Ethernet switches, 31 event-driven validation (NHT), 498 Exclude filters, hip Report messages, 736 exit-address-family command, 904 exit-address-family statement, 623 exit-peer-policy statement, 419 exit-peer-session statement, 415 expanded community lists, scaling BGP, 445-460 expanded keyword, 445 explicit s, multicast routing, 758-759 extendable keyword, 979, 985 extended community lists, scaling BGP, 472-478 extended NAT entries, 980 exterior EGP neighbors, 3

1092

Exterior Gateway Protocol (EGP)

Exterior Gateway Protocol (EGP), 1 functions, 5 Neighbor Acquisition Protocol, 6-8 Neighbor Reachability Protocol, 8-10 Network Reachability Protocol, 10-15 limitations, 15-16 neighbors (peers), 3-4 origins, 2-3 topology, 3-5 exterior gateways, 13 exterior routing protocols, 1 external BGP (EBGP), 22-29 external Border Gateway Protocol (EBGP) peering case study, 110-114, 127-135 peering over IPv6 case study, 114-118 external neighbors, BGP connections, 77-79

F failure detection BFD (Bidirectional Forwarding Detection). See BFD Fast External Fallover. See Fast External Fallover fall-over statement, 414 Fast External Fallover, 509-512 Fast Session Deactivation. See Fast External Fallover FC 904, 8 FIB (Forwarding Information Base), 539 fields CGMP packets, 753 IGMPv2 message format, 737 IGMPv3 hip Query messages, 739-740 IGMPv3 hip Report messages, 740 MSDP Source Active Request TLV format, 899

MSDP Source Active TLV format, 898 PIMv2 Assert messages Encoded Group Address, 816 Encoded Unicast Source Address, 816 Metric, 816 Metric Preference, 816 PIMv2 Bootstrap messages BSR Priority, 814 Encoded Multicast Group Address, 814 Encoded Unicast BSR Address, 814 Encoded Unicast RP Address, 815 Fragment RP Count, 815 Fragment Tag, 814 Hash Mask Length, 814 RP Count, 814 RP Holdtime, 815 RP Priority, 815 PIMv2 Candidate-RP-ment messages Encoded Group Address, 817 Encoded Unicast RP Address, 817 Holdtime, 817 Prefix Count, 817 Priority, 817 PIMv2 Hello messages Option Length, 811 Option Type, 810 Option Value, 811 PIMv2 /Prune messages Encoded ed Source Address, 813 Encoded Multicast Group Address, 813 Encoded Pruned Source Address, 814 Encoded Unicast Upstream Neighbor Address, 813 Number of Groups, 813 Number of ed Sources, 813 Number of Pruned Sources, 813

functions 1093

PIMv2 message header Checksum, 810 Type, 809 Version, 809 PIMv2 messages B (Border bit), 811 Checksum, 811 Multicast Data Packet, 812 N (Null- bit), 812 PIMv2 Stop messages Encoded Group Address, 812 Encoded Unicast Source Address, 812 File Transfer Protocol (FTP), NAT44 operation, 951-953 filtering, mitigating adverse effects on memory utilization, 558 filter-list statement, 419 Filter-Mode-Change field, IGMPv3 Group Record, 741 finite state machine (BGP), 87 Active state, 89 Connect state, 89 Established state, 90 Idle state, 88 input events, 88 OpenConfirm state, 90 OpenSent state, 89 flags, mroute, 808 flapping routes, 47 flood-and-prune protocols, 758 formats BGP messages, 103 Keepalive messages, 108 Notification messages, 108 Open messages, 104 Update messages, 105-106 CGMP packets, 753 DNS messages, 950-951 extended communities, 477 IPv6 multicast addresses, 722

MP_REACH_NLRI (type 14) attribute AFI (Address Family Identifier), 616 Next Hop Address, 617 Next Hop Address Length, 617 NLRI (Network Layer Reachability Information), 617 SAFI (Subsequent Address Family Identifier), 616 forwarder election, PIM-DM (Protocol Independent Multicast-Dense Mode), 782-784 Forwarding Information Base (FIB), 539 forward state, 758 Four-Octet AS-Specific extended communities, 477 fragmentation, 945, 1005-1007 Fragment RP Count field, PIMv2 Bootstrap messages, 815 Fragment Tag field, PIMv2 Bootstrap messages, 814 FTP (File Transfer Protocol), NAT44 operation, 951-953 full IBGP mesh, 119 fully meshed route reflection clusters, 596 functions EGP (Exterior Gateway Protocol), 5 Neighbor Acquisition Protocol, 6-8 Neighbor Reachability Protocol, 8-10 Network Reachability Protocol, 10-15 scaling BGP, 478 BFD (Bidirectional Forwarding Detection), 512-523 U utilization, 552-556 Fast External Fallover, 509-512 GR (Graceful Restart), 538-540 Maximum Prefixes, 540-552 NHT (Next-Hop Tracking), 496-509 ORF (Outbound Route Filters), 486-496

1094

functions

PIC (Prefix Independent Convergence), 523-538 RFD (Route Flap Dampening), 479-486 transport optimization, 563-569 tuning BGP memory, 556-563

G gateways (routers), 2 GDA field, CGMP packet format, 753 GDA (Group Destination Address), 750 ge keyword, BGP policy configuration, 403 General Query message, IGMv2, 732 General Query variant, IGMPv3 hip Query message, 738 global addresses, NAT44, 933 Graceful Restart (GR), 538-540 Graft Ack messages PIMv2 format, 816 PIMv2 routers, 779 Graft messages, 759 DVMRP, 888 PIMv2 format, 816 PIMv2 routers, 779 GR-aware routers, 539 GR-capable routers, 539 GR (Graceful Restart), 538-540 Group Address field IGMPv2 message format, 737 MLDv1 messages, 744 MSDP Source Active TLV format, 899 Group address Prefix field, MSDP Source Active Request TLV format, 899 Group-and-Source-Specific Query, IGMPv3, 735 Group-and-Source-Specific Query variant, IGMPv3 hip Query message, 738 Group Destination Address (GDA), 750

group-list keyword, 842 group maintenance, multicast routing, 728 group hip, multicast routing, 724 group maintenance, 728 ing and leaving groups, 726 latency, 726-727 leave latency, 727 multiple routers on a network, 728-729 Group Record field, IGMPv3 hip Report messages, 741 groups, multicast routing group maintenance, 728 IGMP (Internet Group Management Protocol), 729-741 ing and leaving groups, 726 latency, 726-727 leave latency, 727 multiple routers on a network, 728-729 Group-Specific Query message, IGMPv2, 733 Group-Specific Query variant, IGMPv3 hip Query message, 738

H half-life (RFD, accumulated penalties), 479 ha-mode graceful-restart command, 540 hash function, 789 Hash Mask Length field, PIMv2 Bootstrap messages, 814 header checksums, NAT44 operation, 945 header translation, IPv4/IPv6, 999-1000 Hello interval, 6 Hello keyword, 773 Hello messages, 8 PIMv2 format, 810-811 PIMv2 routers, 773 Option Length field, 811 Option Type field, 810 Option Value field, 811

indirect EGP neighbors 1095

Hello protocols, BFD (Bidirectional Forwarding Detection), 512-523 hold-queue in statement, 568 holdtime Hello and Query messages, 773 Open messages, 86 Holdtime field BGP Open messages, 105 PIMv2 Candidate-RP-ment messages, 817 Host hip Query (Type 1) messages, IGMPv1, 738 Host hip Report (Type 2) messages, IGMPv1, 738 hosts, multicast routing, 726-731 initiating the , 726-727 leave notifications, 727 reports, destination addresses, 728 hot-potato routing, 182

I IANA (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority), 54, 476 IBGP (internal Border Gateway Protocol), 22-29 clients and route reflection clusters, 593 NLRI and, 167 IGP synchronization, 179-182 managing prefixes, 168-179 peering case study, 118-127 scaling BGP network, 575-576 ICANN (Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers), 54 ICMP, NAT44 operation, 947 ICMP/ICMPv6 translation, 1002-1004 ICMP messages, IPv4 to IPv6 translation, 1002 identifier function (IP addresses), 67 Idle state (BGP finite state machine), 88 Idle state (EGP neighbors), 6

IG (inside global) addresses, NAT44, 933 IGMP (Internet Group Management Protocol), 729 IGMPv2 host functions, 730-731 IGMPv2 router functions, 731-735 IGMPv3, 735-736 interface commands, 818-819 message formats, 736-739 IGMPv1, 737-738 IGMPv2, 737 IGMPv3, 738-739 IGMPv3 hip Query, 738-739 IGMPv3 hip Report, 740-741 IGMP hip Report, 793 IGMP/MLD Snooping, 745-749 IGMPv1, 730-738 IGMPv2, 730 host functions, 730-731 message format, 737 router functions, 731-733 IGMPv3, 730, 735-736 hip Query message format, 738-739 hip Report message format, 740-741 message format, 738-739 IGP (interior gateway protocols), 3 synchronization, IBGP and, 179-182 I-H-U (I Hear You) messages, 8 IL (inside local) addresses, NAT44, 933 IMAP (Internet Message Access Protocol), 953 implicit s, multicast routing, 758-759 implicit withdrawal, 534, 568 inbound route filters (ORF), 489 Include filters, hip Report messages, 736 indexes, peer templates, 417 indirect EGP neighbors, 12

1096

infinity keyword

infinity keyword, 806 inheritance peer templates, 413 policy templates, 419-422 session templates, 417-418 inherit peer-session statement, 415 injecting prefixes, configuring NLRI in BGP network mask statement, 160-161 network statement, 156-160 redistribution, 162-167 in keyword, 197 input events, BGP finite state machine, 88 input hold queue, 568 inside global (IG) addresses, NAT44, 933 inside local (IL) addresses, NAT44, 933 Integrated Intermediate System-to-Intermediate System (IS-IS), 3 inter-as-hybrid statement, 419 inter-AS multicasting, 891-894 interconnecting links, route reflection clusters, 606 inter-domain routing BGP (Border Gateway Protocol), 16 advertising BGP NLRI into the local AS, 182-198 AS_PATH attribute, 17-20 configuring and troubleshooting peering, 110-142 configuring NLRI, 155-167 connecting to multiple external neighbors, 77-79 decision process, 100-103 external versus internal BGP, 22-29 finite state machine, 87-90 message formats, 103-108 message types, 85-87 NLRI and IBGP, 167-182 path attributes, 90-100 route aggregation, 198-218

setting routing policy, 79-82 trust issues, 82-84 vector protocol, 17 versions, 16-17 CIDR (classless inter-domain routing), 41 address portability, 58-59 asg IPv4 address blocks, 54-56 classless routing, 43-47 limitations, 62-66 multihoming and provider-assigned addresses, 56-58 provider-independent addresses, 59-60 reducing Class B address space depletion, 50 reducing routing table explosion, 50-53 summarization, 41-42 summarization, 47-50 traffic engineering, 60-62 Exterior Gateway Protocol (EGP), 1 functions, 5-15 limitations, 15-16 origins, 2-3 topology, 3-5 Interface E0, 883 interface-level BFD configuration, 516 interior EGP neighbors, 3 interior gateway protocols (IGP), 3 interior gateways, 13 internal Border Gateway Protocol (IBGP) clients and route reflection clusters, 593 NLRI and, 167 IGP synchronization, 179-182 managing prefixes, 168-179 peering case study, 118-127 scaling BGP network, 575-576 Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA), 54

IP multicast routing 1097

Internet Corporation of Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), 54 Internet exchange points (IXP), public peering, 30 Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP), 729 IGMPv2 host functions, 730-731 IGMPv2 router functions, 731-735 IGMPv3, 735-736 interface commands, 818-819 message formats, 736-739 IGMPv1, 737-738 IGMPv2, 737 IGMPv3, 738-739 IGMPv3 hip Query, 738-739 IGMPv3 hip Report, 740-741 Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP), 953 Internet routing table, 78 internetwork, 2 interval keyword, 841 interval min-tx min-rx multiplier command, 522 interval-vpn-client statement, 419 intra-AS IP multicast routing protocols, 754 in-use keyword, 844 I/O process (BGP), 554 IP address conservation, NAT44 operation, 934-937 ip bgp community command, 451 ip bgp-community new-format statement, 426 ip bgp fast-external-fallover [permit | deny statement, 512 ip bgp new-format statement, 444-447 ip cgmp command, 819 ip cgmp proxy command, 819 ip default-gateway command, 961 ip igmp querier-timeout statement, 733

ip igmp query-interval statement, 732 ip igmp query-max-response-time statement, 732 ip igmp version 1 statement, 735 ip igmp version command, 730, 818 IP masquerading, 940-942 ip mroute command, 861 ip msdp cache-sa-state command, 897, 911 ip msdp default-peer command, 923 ip msdp filter-sa-request command, 912 ip msdp mesh-group command, 915 ip msdp originator-id command, 918 ip msdp peer command, 908 ip msdp redistribute command, 912 ip msdp redistribute statement, 912 ip msdp sa-filter in command, 912 ip msdp sa-filter out command, 912 ip msdp sa-request command, 898 ip msdp sa-request statement, 912 ip msdp ttl-threshold command, 912 ip multicast boundary command, 882 IP multicast routing, 713 Anycast RP, 917-923 configuring MBGP, 902-908 configuring MSDP, 908-913 implicit s versus explicit s, 758-759 intra-AS IP multicast routing protocols, 754 MSDP default peers, 923-925 MSDP mesh groups, 913-915 multicast forwarding, 754-756 multicast route discovery, 756-757 multicast scoping, 762 istrative scoping, 765-766 TTL scoping, 763-765 requirements, 716-717 CGMP (Cisco Group Management Protocol), 749-753 group hip, 724-729

1098

IP multicast routing

IGMP (Internet Group Management Protocol), 729-741 IGMP/MLD Snooping, 745-749 IPv4 multicast addresses, 717-721 IPv6 multicast addresses, 721-724 MLD (Multicast Listener Discovery), 742-746 scaling, 881 connecting to DVMRP networks, 888-891 inter-AS multicasting, 891-894 multicasting across nonmulticast domains, 885-887 scope, 881-884 source-based trees versus shared trees, 759-761 sparse versus dense topologies, 757 SSM (Source-Specific-Multicast), 761-762 ip multicast-routing command, 818 IP multicast routing protocols configuring, 817 multicast load sharing, 856-862 PIM-DM (Protocol Independent Multicast-Dense Mode), 819-828 PIM-SM (Protocol Independent Multicast-Sparse Mode), 828-855 PIM-DM (Protocol Independent Multicast-Dense Mode), 773 designated routers, 782 forwarder election, 782-784 PIMv2 messages, 773-779 prune overrides, 779-781 unicast route changes, 782 PIM (Protocol Independent Multicast), 771-773 PIM-SM (Protocol Independent Multicast-Sparse Mode), 785 PIMv2 messages, 786, 808-817 RP (Rendezvous Point), 787-793 shared trees, 793-796

source registration, 796-802 SPTs (shortest path trees), 803-808 troubleshooting, 863 mrinfo command, 865-867 mstat command, 869-872 mtrace command, 867-869 ip multicast-routing statement, 903 ip multicast ttl-threshold command, 881 ip nat inside command, 956 ip nat inside source list statement, 965 ip nat inside source statement, 977 ip nat inside source static commands, 957 ip nat outside command, 956 ip nat outside source static command, 958 ip nat pool statement, 965 ip nat translation command, 987 ip nat translation max-entries command, 987 ip nat translation max-entries statement, 968 ip nat translation timeout command, 936, 968, 987 ip nat translation timeout statement, 968 IP Next Generation (IPng), 41 IPng (IP Next Generation), 41 ip pim bsr-candidate command, 814, 850, 854 ip pim dense-mode command, 819-821 ip pim message-interval command, 795 ip pim query-interval command, 773 ip pim rp-address 10.224.1.1 command, 830 ip pim rp-candidate command, 850 ip pim send-rp-announce command, 838 ip pim send-rp-announce group-list command, 849 ip pim sparse-dense-mode command, 847 ip pim sparse-mode command, 829 ip pim spt-threshold command, 806, 835 ip pim version command, 809 ip routing command, 818

/Prune messages 1099

ip spd headroom {value} statement, 569 IP subnets, 577 IPv4 address blocks (CIDR), 54-56 multicast addresses, 717-721 IPv4-Address-Specific extended communities, 477-478 IPv4-embedded IPv6 addresses, stateless NAT64, 1031 IPv4 extended community attribute, 476 IPv4-Mapped IPv6 Address, 625 IPv4-to-IPv4 translation. See NAT44 IPv4-to-IPv6 address translation. See NAT64 IPv6, 66 address family, MBGP , 618-619 challenges, 996 configuring MBGP for, 619 case study, 666-705 dual stack MBGP connection, 642-647 IPv4 and IPv6 over an IPv6 T connection, 631-641 Ipv4 and IPv6 prefixes over an IPv4 T session, 620-628 mixed IPv4 and IPv6 sessions, 650-653 multihop dual stack MBGP connection, 647-650 Multiprotocol IBGP, 654-666 upgrading IPv4 BGP configurations to the address family format, 629-631 link-local address scope, 619 multicast addresses, 721-724 multicast networks, istrative scoping, 883 multicast scope values, 884 peering case study, 114-118 site-local scope, 618 IPv6 Address (AAAA) records, 949

IPv6-Address-Specific extended communities, 477 IPv6 extended community attribute, 476 ipv6 multicast boundary block source statement, 885 ipv6 multicast boundary scope statement, 884 ipv6 nat prefix statement, 1011 ipv6 nat statement, 1011 ipv6 nat v4v6 source list statement, 1021 ipv6 nat v4v6 source statement, 1018 ipv6 nat v6v4 pool v4Pool statement, 1021 ipv6 pim rp embedded statement, 793 IPv6 prefix list, 625 ipv6 route statement, 1036 IPv6-to-IPv4 address translation. See NAT64 ipv6 unicast-routing statement, 620, 632 ip virtual-reassembly statement, 956 IS-IS (Integrated Intermediate System-to-Intermediate System), 3 ISP migration, NAT44 operation, 937-938 IXP (Internet exchange peering), public peering, 30

J ing groups, multicast routing, 726 latency, multicast routing, 726-727 messages, PIMv2 routers, 775 packets (CGMP), 749 /Prune messages PIMv2 format, 812-814 PIMv2 routers, 775 Encoded ed Source Address field, 813 Encoded Multicast Group Address field, 813 Encoded Pruned Source Address field, 814

1100

/Prune messages

Encoded Unicast Upstream Neighbor Address field, 813 Number of Groups field, 813 Number of ed Sources field, 813 Number of Pruned Sources field, 813

K keepalive interval, 86 Keepalive messages (BGP), 20, 86, 108 Keepalive TLV (MSDP message), 900 keywords additive, 463 as-set, 214, 581 expanded, 445 extendable, 979, 985 ge, 403 group-list, 842 Hello, 773 in, 197 infinity, 806 interval, 841 in-use, 844 le, 403 netmask, 966 never, 968 out, 197 overload, 982 prefix-length, 966 rotary, 967 Router-Query, 773 standard, 445 summary-only, 203 type match-host, 967 type rotary, 984 v4-mapped, 1021 warning-only, 542

L Label Switched Paths (LSPs), 474 LACNIC (Latin American and Caribbean Network Information Centre), 55 Last Member Query interval, queries, 733 Latin American and Caribbean Network Information Centre (LACNIC), 55 leaf networks, 756 Leave Group (0x17) messages, IGMPv2, 737 Leave Group messages, IGMPv2, 731 leave latency, multicast routing, 727 Leave messages, IGMP, 826 leave packets (CGMP), 749 leaving groups, multicast routing, 726 le keyword, BGP policy configuration, 403 length field (BGP messages), 103 limitations CIDR (classless inter-domain routing), 62-66 EGP (Exterior Gateway Protocol), 15-16 stateful NAT64, 1043 stateless NAT64, 1038 linear inheritance, session templates, 417-418 link-local address scope, IPv6, 619 LIRs (Local Internet Registries), 55, 995 load balancing configuring NAT44, 982-984 multihoming and, 36-37 load distribution, NAT44 operation, 942-943 load sharing multicast routing, 856-862 multihoming and, 36-37 local addresses, NAT44, 933 local AS, advertising BGP NLRI, 182 local-as statement, 415

hip Report message format, IGMPv3 1101

local connectivity, multihoming, 35 Local Internet Registries (LIRs), 55, 995 Local-Node scope, multicast addresses, 723 LOCAL_PREF attributes, confederation EBGP, 581 LOCAL_PREF value, 101 locator function (IP addresses), 67 Loc-RIB, 100 loop-free route exchange, 23-26 loop-free topology, 585 LSPs (Label Switched Paths), 474

M Mail Exchange (MX) records, 949 Management Information Bases (MIB), 953 many-to-many applications, 716 mapping agents, RP, 789 marker field (BGP messages), 103 match interface command, 978 match ip next-hop command, 978 maximum argument, Maximum Prefixes feature, 542 maximum-paths command, 20 maximum-paths statement, 102, 605 Maximum Prefixes feature, scaling BGP, 540-552 maximum-prefix statement, 419 Maximum Response Delay field, MLDv1 messages, 743 Maximum Segment Size (MSS), 563 maximum suppress limit (RFD), 479 Max Response Code field, IGMPv3 messages, 739 Max Response Time field, IGMPv2 message format, 737 Max Response Time, queries, 731 MBGP (Multicast BGP), configuring, 902-908

MBGP (Multiprotocol BGP), 615, 717 attributes, 616-618 configuring for IPv6, 488, 619 case study, 666-705 dual stack MBGP connection, 642-647 IPv4 and IPv6 over an IPv6 T connection, 631-641 Ipv4 and IPv6 prefixes over an IPv4 T session, 620-628 mixed IPv4 and IPv6 sessions, 650-653 multihop dual stack MBGP connection, 647-650 Multiprotocol IBGP, 654-666 upgrading IPv4 BGP configurations to the address family format, 629-631 PIM-SM inter-AS multicasting, 893-895 for IPv6 address family, 618-619 MBone (Multicast Backbone), 717 TTL scopng thresholds, 763 TTL thresholds, 882 mechanisms, EGP (Exterior Gateway Protocol), 5 Neighbor Acquisition Protocol, 6-8 Neighbor Reachability Protocol, 8-10 Network Reachability Protocol, 10-15 MED attribute, 177, 585 MED (MULTI_EXIT_DISC) value, 102 member autonomous systems, 576 member discovery, multicast groups, 726 hip Queries, IGMP/MLD Snooping, 748 hip Query (0x11) messages, IGMPv2, 737 hip Query message format, IGMPv3, 738-739 hip Query (type 130) messages (MLDv2), 744 hip Report message format, IGMPv3, 740-741

1102

hip Report messages, IGMPv2

hip Report messages, IGMPv2, 730-731 hip Reports, IGMP/MLD Snooping, 748 hip Report (type 143) messages (MLDv2), 745-746 memory, tuning BGP usage, 556-563 merged networks, configuring NAT44, 969-975 mesh groups (MSDP), 913-915 message cache, BGP update groups, 568 message formats BGP, 85, 103 Keepalive, 108 Notification, 108 Open, 104 Update, 105-106 IGMP (Internet Group Management Protocol), 736 IGMPv1, 737-738 IGMPv2, 737 IGMPv3, 738-739 IGMP (Internet Group Management Protocol) IGMPv3 hip Query message format, 738-739 IGMPv3 hip Report message format, 740-741 MLD (Multicast Listener Discovery), 743 MLDv1, 743-744 MLDv2 hip Query (type 130), 744 MLDv2 hip Report (type 143), 745-746 MSDP (Multicast Source Discovery Protocol), 898 Keepalive TLV, 900 Notification TLV, 900 Source Active Request TLV, 899 Source Active Response TLV, 900 Source Active TLV, 898-899 PIM, 773

PIMv2, 773-809 Assert, 815 Bootstrap, 814-815 Candidate-RP-ment, 817 Graft-Ack, 816 Graft, 816 Hello, 810-811 /Prune, 812-814 PIMv2 message header format, 809-810 , 811 Stop, 812 message headers (BGP), 103 messages BGP, 85, 103 Keepalive message format, 108 Notification message format, 108 Open message format, 104 Update message format, 105-106 PIMv2, 773-809 Assert message format, 815 Bootstrap message format, 814-815 Candidate-RP-ment message format, 817 Graft-Ack message format, 816 Graft message format, 816 Hello message format, 810-811 /Prune message format, 812-814 PIMv2 message header format, 809-810 message format, 811 Stop message format, 812 Keepalive, 86 Notification, 87 Open, 85-86 Route Refresh, 85 Update, 86-87 message types (EGP), 5-6 Metric field, PIMv2 Assert messages, 816

multicasting 1103

Metric Preference field, PIMv2 Assert messages, 816 MIB (Management Information Bases), 953 migration, ISP NAT44 operation, 937-938 Minimum Route ment Intervals (MRAI), 485 MLD (Multicast Listener Discovery), 742 message format, 743 MLDv1 message format, 743-744 MLDv2 hip Query (type 130) message format, 744 MLDv2 hip Report (type 143) message format, 745-746 MLDv1 message format, 743-744 RFC 2710, 742 MLDv2 message format hip Query (type 130), 744 hip Report (type 143), 745-746 RFC 3810, 742 MODE_IS_EXCLUDE (Type 2) current-state record format, 741 MODE_IS_INCLUDE (Type 1) current-state record format, 741 MOSPF (Multicast OSPF), 754, 771-772 mpackets (multicast packets), 834 MP-BGP (multi-protocol BGP), 22 MPLS (Multi-Protocol Label Switching), 472-474 MP_REACH_NLRI (type 14) (Multiprotocol Reachable NLRI) attribute, 616 AFI (Address Family Identifier), 616 Next Hop Address, 617 Next Hop Address Length, 617 NLRI (Network Layer Reachability Information), 617 SAFI (Subsequent Address Family Identifier), 616

MP_REACH_NLRI (type 15) (Multiprotocol Reachable NLRI) attribute, 894 MP_UNREACH_NLRI (type 15) (Multiprotocol Unreachable NLRI) attribute, 616, 894 MRAI (Minimum Route ment Intervals), 485 mrinfo command, 865-867 mroute flags, 808 MSDP-based Anycast RP, 790 MSDP (Multicast Source Discovery Protocol) configuring, 908-913, 923-925 mesh groups, 913-915 message formats, 898 Keepalive TLV, 900 Notification TLV, 900 Source Active Request TLV, 899 Source Active Response TLV, 900 Source Active TLV, 898-899 PIM-SM inter-AS multicasting, 894-898 MSS (Maximum Segment Size), 563 mstat command, 869-872 mtrace command, 867-869 multiaccess networks forwarder election, 782-784 Prune Override mechanism, 796 Multicast Address field, IGMPv3 Group Record, 741 Multicast Backbone (MBone), 717 TTL scoping thresholds, 763 TTL thresholds, 882 Multicast BGP (MBGP), configuring, 902-908 multicast channels, 762 Multicast Data Packet field, PIMv2 messages, 812 multicast forwarding, 754-756 multicasting, 713 Anycast RP, 917-923 configuring MBGP, 902-908

1104

multicasting

configuring MSDP, 908-913 MSDP default peers, 923-925 MSDP mesh groups, 913-915 scaling connecting to DVMRP networks, 888-891 inter-AS multicasting, 891-894 IP multicast routing, 881 multicasting across nonmulticast domains, 885-887 scope, 881-884 Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD), 742 message format, 743 MLDv1 message format, 743-744 MLDv2 hip Query (type 130) message format, 744 MLDv2 hip Report (type 143) message format, 745-746 multicast load sharing, 856-862 Multicast OSPF (MOSPF), 754, 771-772 multicast packets (mpackets), 834 Multicast Reverse Path Forwarding, 757 multicast route discovery, 756-757 multicast routing, 713 Anycast RP, 917-923 configuring MBGP, 902-908 configuring MSDP, 908-913 implicit s versus explicit s, 758-759 intra-AS IP multicast routing protocols, 754 MSDP default peers, 923-925 MSDP mesh groups, 913-915 multicast forwarding, 754-756 multicast route discovery, 756-757 multicast scoping, 762 istrative scoping, 765-766 TTL scoping, 763-765 requirements, 716 CGMP (Cisco Group Management Protocol), 749-753 group hip, 724-729

IGMP (Internet Group Management Protocol), 729-741 IGMP/MLD Snooping, 745-749 IPv4 multicast addresses, 717-721 IPv6 multicast addresses, 721-724 MLD (Multicast Listener Discovery), 742-746 scaling, 881 connecting to DVMRP networks, 888-891 inter-AS multicasting, 891-894 multicasting across nonmulticast domains, 885-887 scope, 881-884 source-based trees versus shared trees, 759-761 sparse versus dense topologies, 757 SSM (Source-Specific-Multicast), 761-762 multicast routing protocols configuring, 817 multicast load sharing, 856-862 PIM-DM (Protocol Independent Multicast-Dense Mode), 819-828 PIM-SM (Protocol Independent Multicast-Sparse Mode), 828-855 PIM-DM (Protocol Independent Multicast-Dense Mode), 773 designated routers, 782 forwarder election, 782-784 PIMv2 messages, 773-779 prune overrides, 779-781 unicast route changes, 782 PIM (Protocol Independent Multicast), 771-773 PIM-SM (Protocol Independent Multicast-Sparse Mode), 785 PIMv2 messages, 786, 808-817 RP (Rendezvous Point), 787-793 shared trees, 793-796 source registration, 796-802 SPTs (shortest path trees), 803-808

My Autonomous System field, BGP Open messages 1105

troubleshooting, 863-864 mrinfo command, 865-867 mstat command, 869-872 mtrace command, 867-869 multicast scoping, 762 istrative scoping, 765-766 TTL scoping, 763-765 Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP) configuring, 908-913 default peers, 923-925 mesh groups, 913-915 message formats, 898 Keepalive TLV, 900 Notification TLV, 900 Source Active Request TLV, 899 Source Active Response TLV, 900 Source Active TLV, 898-899 PIM-SM inter-AS multicasting, 894-898 multicast storm, 755 multicast trees, 757-761 MULTI_EXIT_DISC attributes, confederation EBGP, 581 MULTI_EXIT_DISC (MED) attribute, 159 multihomed autonomous systems configuring NAT44, 975-980 NAT44 operation, 938-939 multihoming, 29 BGP connections, 77-79 CIDR and, 56-58 load sharing and load balancing, 36-37 multiple AS (autonomous systems), 79 provider-assigned (PA) addressing, 40 routing policies, 36 stub AS (autonomous systems), 31-36 traffic control, 37 transit AS (autonomous systems), 30-31 multihop BFD templates, configuring, 523 multihop dual stack MBGP connection, 647-650

Multikit, 725 multilateral peering agreements, 30 Multiprotocol BGP (MBGP), 615, 717 attributes, 616-618 configuring for IPv6, 488, 619 case study, 666-705 dual stack MBGP connection, 642-647 IPv4 and IPv6 over an IPv6 T connection, 631-641 Ipv4 and IPv6 prefixes over an IPv4 T session, 620-628 mixed IPv4 and IPv6 sessions, 650-653 multihop dual stack MBGP connection, 647-650 Multiprotocol IBGP, 654-666 upgrading IPv4 BGP configurations to the address family format, 629-631 PIM-SM inter-AS multicasting, 893-895 for IPv6 address family, 618-619 Multiprotocol IBGP, configuring MBGP, 654-666 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS), 472-474 Multiprotocol Reachable NLRI MP_ REACH_NLRI (type 14) attribute, 616 AFI (Address Family Identifier), 616 Next Hop Address, 617 Next Hop Address Length, 617 NLRI (Network Layer Reachability Information), 617 SAFI (Subsequent Address Family Identifier), 616 Multiprotocol Reachable NLRI (MP_ REACH_NLRI (type15) attribute, 894 Multiprotocol Unreachable NLRI (MP_ UNREACH_NLRI (type 15)) attribute, 616, 894 MX (Mail Exchange) records, 949 My Autonomous System field, BGP Open messages, 104

1106

name servers (DNS)

N name servers (DNS), 949 NAPT (Network Address and Port Translation), 940-942 NAPT-PT (Network Address and Port Translation with Protocol Translation), 1010 NAT44 (Network Address Translation IPv4/IPv4), 931 configuring, 955 dynamic NAT case study, 964-969 ISP multihoming case study, 975-980 network merger case study, 969-975 PAT (Port Address Translation) case study, 980-982 service distribution case study, 984-986 static NAT case study, 955-962 T load balancing case study, 982-984 operation, 932 basic concepts, 932-934 encryption, 945 fragmentation issue, 945 header checksums, 945 IP address conservation, 934-937 ISP migration, 937-938 multihomed autonomous systems, 938-939 PAT (Port Address Translation), 940-942 protocol-specific issues, 946-954 security issues, 946 T load distribution, 942-943 virtual servers, 944 troubleshooting, 986-988

NAT64 (Network Address Translation IPv6/IPv4), 931 NAT-PT (Network Address Translation with Port Translation), 1007 configuring, 1010-1028 obsoletion, 1029-1031 operation, 1008 SIIT (Stateless IP/ICMP Translation), 997 fragmentation and PMTU, 1005-1007 header translation, 999-1000 ICMP/ICMPv6 translation, 1002-1004 Transport Layer header translation, 1006 stateful NAT64, 1038 configuring, 1041 limitations, 1043 operation, 1038-1040 stateless NAT64, 1031 configuring, 1036 limitations, 1038 operation, 1031-1035 nat64 enable statement, 1036, 1041 nat64 prefix stateful statement, 1041 nat64 prefix stateless statement, 1036 nat64 v4 pool statement, 1041 nat64 v6v4 list statement, 1041 NAT (Network Address Translation), 41, 931 NAT44. See NAT44 NAT64. See NAT64 NAT (network address translator), 931 NAT-PT (Network Address Translation with Port Translation), 1007 configuring, 1010-1028 obsoletion, 1029-1031 operation, 1008 NAT-T (NAT Traversal) technique, 946

Network Interface Card (NIC), multicast-awareness 1107

NAT Traversal (NAT-T) technique, 946 NDP (Neighbor Discovery Protocol), 723 neighbor 192.168.1.253 route-map COMMUNITY out command, 203 neighbor 192.168.1.253 send-community statement, 203 Neighbor Acquisition Confirm message, 6 Neighbor Acquisition Protocol, 6-8 Neighbor Acquisition Refuse message, 7 Neighbor Acquisition Request message, 6 neighbor activate statement, 623 neighbor AS, advertising a default route, 196-198 Neighbor Cease Acknowledgment, 7 Neighbor Cease message, 7 neighbor CLIENTS peer-group statement, 404 neighbor default-originate statement, 196-197 neighbor disable-connected-check statement, 130, 135 Neighbor Discovery Protocol (NDP), 723 neighbor distribute-list statement, 197, 211 neighbor ebgp multihop statement, 627 neighbor ebgp-multihop statement, 131, 649 neighbor ebgp multi-hop statements, 403 neighbor inherit peer-session statement, 415 neighbor {ip-address} additional-paths statement, 534 neighbor {IP_Address} capability orf prefix-list command, 489 neighbor {IP-Address} fall-over bfd command, 523 neighbor {ip-address} fall-over bfd statement, 514 neighbor {ip-address} fall-over statement, 512 neighbor {IP-Address} ha-mode graceful-restart command, 540

neighbor {IP-Address} maximum-prefix statement, 542 neighbor {ip-address} transport path-mtu-discovery {enable|disable} statement, 564 neighbor next-hop-self command, 581 neighbor next-hop-self statement, 177, 185, 403, 657-659, 672 neighbor statement, 138, 403, 657, 661 Neighbor Reachability Protocol, 8-10 neighbor remote-as statement, 110-112, 403, 621-623, 657 neighbor route-reflector-client statement, 601 neighbor send-community statement, 425, 435, 463-465 neighbor shutdown statement, 142 neighbor timers, 86 neighbor ttl-security statement, 139 neighbor update-source statement, 126, 185, 403, 649, 657 neighbor version (BGP), 85 nested route reflection clusters, 595 netmask keyword, 966 Network Address and Port Translation (NAPT), 940-942 Network Address and Port Translation with Protocol Translation (NAPT-PT), 1010 Network Address Translation (NAT), 41, 931 NAT44. See NAT44 NAT64. See NAT64 Network Address Translation with Port Translation (NAT-PT), 1007 configuring, 1010-1028 obsoletion, 1029-1031 operation, 1008 network address translator (NAT), 931 Network Interface Card (NIC), multicast-awareness, 720

1108

Network Layer Reachability Information field, BGP Update messages

Network Layer Reachability Information field, BGP Update messages, 107 Network Layer Reachability Information (NLRI), 895 advertising BGP NLRI into the local AS, 182 advertising a default route to a neighboring AS, 196-198 distributing NLRI in a stub AS with IBGP, 184-192 distributing NLRI in a stub AS with static routes, 193-195 redistributing BGP NLRI into the IGP, 182 configuring in BGP, 155 injecting prefixes with redistribution, 162-167 injecting prefixes with the network mask statement, 160-161 injecting prefixes with the network statement, 156-160 IBGP and, 167 IGP synchronization, 179-182 managing prefixes, 168-179 NLRI field, MP_REACH_NLRI (type 14) attribute, 617 Update messages, 86 network mask statement, configuring NLRI in BGP, 160-161 network merger (case study), configuring NAT44, 969-975 Network Reachability Protocol, 10-15 network statement, 102 creating an aggregate address under BGP, 199 injecting prefixes, configuring NLRI in BGP, 156-160 Network Time Protocol (NTP), IPv4 multicast address, 719 never keyword, 968 Next Hop Address field, MP_REACH_ NLRI (type 14) attribute, 617

Next Hop Address Length field, MP_REACH_NLRI (type 14) attribute, 617 NEXT_HOP attribute BGP, 97, 100 confederation EBGP, 580 next-hop-self configuration, 100 next-hop-self statement, 419 Next-Hop Tracking (NHT), 496-509 next-hop-unchanged statement, 419 NHT (Next-Hop Tracking), 496-509 NIC (Network Interface Card), multicast-awareness, 720 NLRI (Network Layer Reachability Information), 895 advertising BGP NLRI into the local AS, 182 advertising a default route to a neighboring AS, 196-198 distributing NLRI in a stub AS with IBGP, 184-192 distributing NLRI in a stub AS with static routes, 193-195 redistributing BGP NLRI into the IGP, 182 configuring in BGP, 155 injecting prefixes with redistribution, 162-167 injecting prefixes with the network mask statement, 160-161 injecting prefixes with the network statement, 156-160 IBGP and, 167 IGP synchronization, 179-182 managing prefixes, 168-179 NLRI field, MP_REACH_NLRI (type 14) attribute, 617 Update messages, 86 N (Null- bit) field, PIMv2 messages, 812 no address-family ipv4 command, 652 NO_ attribute, well-known communities, 432-433

operation 1109

no bgp client-to-client reflection command, 606 no bgp fast-external-fallover command, 510 no bgp nexthop trigger enable command, 498 no bgp recursion host statement, 526 no bgp transport path-mtu-discovery statement, 564 NO_EXPORT attribute COMMUNITY path attribute, 203 well-known communities, 428-430 no ip default ipv4-unicast command, 906 no ip mroute-cache command, 819 no ip nat service alg t dns statement, 964 no ip nat service alg udp dns statement, 964 no ip routing command, 961 no neighbor activate statement, 642 nonmulticast domains, multicasting across, 885-887 Non-Stop Forwarding (NSF), 538 Non-Stop Routing (NSR), 540 no synchronization statement, 179 Notification messages (BGP), 87, 108 Notification TLV (MSDP message), 900 NSFnet, 15 NSF (Non-Stop Forwarding), 538 n-squared problem (IBGP), scaling BGP, 575-576 NSR (Non-Stop Routing), 540 NTP (Network Time Protocol), IPv4 multicast address, 719 Null- bit ( messages), 798 Number of Group Records field, IGMPv3 hip Report messages, 740 Number of Groups field, PIMv2 / Prune messages, 813 Number of ed Sources field, PIMv2 /Prune messages, 813

Number of Pruned Sources field, PIMv2 /Prune messages, 813 Number of Sources field IGMPv3 Group Record, 741 IGMPv3 hip Query messages, 740

O OG (outside global) addresses, NAT44, 934 Old Host Present Timer, 734 OL (outside local) addresses, NAT44, 934 one-to-many applications, 716 online ‘TV Guides,” advertising multicast groups, 724 Opaque extended communities, 477-478 OpenConfirm state (BGP finite state machine), 90 Open messages (BGP), 85-86, 104 Open process (BGP), 554 OpenSent state (BGP finite state machine), 89 Open Shortest Path First (OSPF), 3 operation NAT44, 932 basic concepts, 932-934 encryption, 945 fragmentation issue, 945 header checksums, 945 IP address conservation, 934-937 ISP migration, 937-938 multihomed autonomous systems, 938-939 PAT (Port Address Translation), 940-942 protocol-specific issues, 946-954 security issues, 946 T load distribution, 942-943 virtual servers, 944 NAT-PT (Network Address Translation with Port Translation), 1008

1110

operation

stateful NAT64, 1038-1040 stateless NAT64, 1031-1035 optional capabilities (BGP), Open messages, 86 optional nontransitive path attributes, 91 Optional Parameters field, BGP Open messages, 105 Optional Parameters Length field, BGP Open messages, 105 optional transitive path attributes, 90 Option Length field, PIMv2 Hello messages, 811 Option Type field, PIMv2 Hello messages, 810 Option Value field, PIMv2 Hello messages, 811 ORF (Outbound Route Filters), 486-496 ORIGINATOR_ID attribute, 561, 595 ORIGIN path attribute (BGP), 92 OSPF (Open Shortest Path First), 3 OSPFv3, configuring IPv4 and IPv6 address families, 655 outbound route filters (ORF), 489 Outbound Route Filters (ORF), 486-496 out keyword, 197 outside global (OG) addresses, NAT44, 934 outside local (OL) addresses, NAT44, 934 overlapping routes, 208 overload keyword, 982 ow ip bgp rib-failure command, 165

P PA (provider-assigned addressing), multihoming and, 40 ive EGP neighbors, 8 statement, 415 PASV command, 952

path attributes, 17, 21, 36 BGP (Border Gateway Protocol), 90-91 AS_PATH, 17-20, 92-97 NEXT_HOP, 97, 100 ORIGIN, 92 Weight, 100 Update messages, 86 Path Attributes field, BGP Update messages, 106 path-attribute statement, 415 path diversity, multihoming and, 36 Path Identifier (Path ID), 534 Path ID (Path Identifier), 534 Path MTU Discovery (PMTUD) feature, 564-567, 998, 1005-1007 paths (BGP), Memory utilization, 558 path vector routing protocol, 17 PAT (Port Address Translation) configuring NAT44, 980-982 NAT44 operation, 940-942 peer groups creating, 404-407 scaling BGP, 403-413 peering (BGP) agreements, 30 configuring and troubleshooting, 110 BGP connection security case study, 136-142 EBGP multihop case study, 127-135 EBGP peering case study, 110-114 EBGP peering over IPv6 case study, 114-118 IBGP peering case study, 118-127 peering points, 35 route reflection clusters, 594 peer RPF flooding, 896 peers (EGP neighbors), 3-4 peer templates, scaling BGP, 413 policy templates, 419-425 session templates, 414-418

Pointer (PTR) records 1111

penalties, BGP process configuration, 479-486 permanent groups (multicast), 719 permit statement, 166 phases, BGP decision process, 101 PIC (Prefix Independent Convergence), 523-538 PIM-DM (Protocol Independent Multicast-Dense Mode), 754, 771 configuring, 819-828 designated routers, 782 forwarder election, 782-784 PIMv2 messages, 773-779 prune overrides, 779-781 unicast route changes, 782 PIM Multicast Border Router (PMBR), 892 PIM (Protocol Independent Multicast), message formats, 773 PIM-SM Internet Draft, 892 PIM-SM (Protocol Independent Multicast-Sparse Mode), 754, 771, 785 configuring, 828-855 inter-AS multicasting, 892 MBGP (Multiprotocol BGP), 893-895 MSDP (Multicast Source Discovery Protocol), 894-900 RPF interfaces, 893 PIMv2 messages, 786, 808-809 Assert message format, 815 Bootstrap message format, 814-815 Candidate-RP-ment message format, 817 Graft-Ack message format, 816 Graft message format, 816 Hello message format, 810-811 /Prune message format, 812-814

PIMv2 message header format, 809-810 message format, 811 Stop message format, 812 RP (Rendezvous Point), 787 Auto-RP protocol, 789-790 bootstrap protocol, 787-789 Embedded RP addresses, 790-793 shared trees, 793-796 source registration, 796-802 SPTs (shortest path trees), 803-808 PIM Source Specific Multicast (PIM-SSM), 771 PIM-SSM (Protocol Independent Multicast, Source-Specific Multicast), 754 PIMv2 (Protocol Independent Multicast Version 2) messages, 773-786, 808-809 Assert message format, 815 Bootstrap message format, 814-815 Candidate-RP-ment message format, 817 Graft-Ack message format, 816 Graft message format, 816 Hello message format, 810-811 /Prune message format, 812-814 PIMv2 message header format, 809-810 message format, 811 Stop message format, 812 PMBR (PIM Multicast Border Router), 892 PMI-SSM (PIM Source Specific Multicast), 771 PMTUD (Path MTU Discovery) feature, 564-567, 998, 1005-1007 Pointer (PTR) records, 949

1112

policy configuration

policy configuration MBGP (Multiprotocol BGP), 666-705 identifying prefixes, 667-672 policy and session templates, 677-685, 701 policy configuration statements, 660 policy lists, 403 policy templates configuring BGP scalability, 419-425 configuring MBGP, 677-685, 701 Poll interval, 6 Poll messages, 10 POP (Post Office Protocol), 953 Port Address Translation (PAT) configuring NAT44, 980-982 NAT44 operation, 940-942 PORT command, 952 Postel, Jon, 54 Post Office Protocol (POP), 953 Prefix Count field, PIMv2 Candidate-RP-ment messages, 817 prefixes identifying, MBGP policy configuration AS_PATH access lists, 672 communities, 667-672 configuring NLRI in BGP injecting with network mask statement, 160-161 injecting with network statement, 156-160 injecting with redistribution, 162-167 IPv6 multicast addresses, 721 managing in an IBGP topology, 168-179 memory utilization, 558 prefix leaking, 57 prefix lists BGP policy configuration, 403 prefix-list statement, 419

Prefix Independent Convergence (PIC), 523-538 prefix leaking, 57 Prefix Length field MSDP Source Active Request TLV format, 899 MSDP Source Active TLV format, 899 prefix-length keyword, 966 prefix-length-size statement, 419 prefix lists BGP policy configuration, 403 prefix-list statement, 419 prepended AS numbers, 93 prerequisites, BFD operations, 513 primary servers (DNS), 949 Priority field, PIMv2 Candidate-RP-ment messages, 817 private AS numbers, scaling BGP network, 569-574 private peering, 30 private-use addresses, 618 Probe messages (DVMRP), 888-889 Protocol Independent Multicast-Dense Mode (PIM-DM), 754, 771 configuring, 819-828 designated routers, 782 forwarder election, 782-784 PIMv2 messages, 773-779 prune overrides, 779-781 unicast route changes, 782 Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM), message formats, 773 Protocol Independent Multicast, Source-Specific Multicast (PIM-SSM), 754 Protocol Independent Multicast-Sparse Mode (PIM-SM), 754, 785 configuring, 828-855 inter-AS multicasting, 892 MBGP (Multiprotocol BGP), 893-895

queries 1113

MSDP (Multicast Source Discovery Protocol), 894-900 RPF interfaces, 893 PIMv2 messages, 786, 808-809 Assert message format, 815 Bootstrap message format, 814-815 Candidate-RP-ment message format, 817 Graft-Ack message format, 816 Graft message format, 816 Hello message format, 810-811 /Prune message format, 812-814 PIMv2 message header format, 809-810 message format, 811 Stop message format, 812 RP (Rendezvous Point), 787 Auto-RP protocol, 789-790 bootstrap protocol, 787-789 Embedded RP addresses, 790-793 shared trees, 793-796 source registration, 796-802 SPTs (shortest path trees), 803-808 Protocol Independent Multicast Version 2 (PIMv2), messages, 773-786, 808-809 Assert message format, 815 Bootstrap message format, 814-815 Candidate-RP-ment message format, 817 Graft-Ack message format, 816 Graft message format, 816 Hello message format, 810-811 /Prune message format, 812-814 PIMv2 message header format, 809-810 message format, 811 Stop message format, 812 protocols intra-AS IP multicast routing protocols, 754

protocol-specific NAT44 operation, 946-947 DNS, 948-951 FTP, 951-953 ICMP, 947 routing protocols, 953 SMTP, 953 Traceroute, 953-954 provider-assigned (PA) addressing CIDR and, 56-58 multihoming and, 40 provider-independent addresses, CIDR and, 59-60 Prune messages, 758 DVMRP, 889-890 PIMv2 routers, 775 Prune Override mechanism multiaccess networks, 796 PIM-DM (Protocol Independent Multicast Version 2), 779-781 prune state, 758 PTR (Pointer) records, 949 public IP addresses, mapping to private addresses. See NAT44 public peering, 30

Q QQIC (Querier’s Query Interval Code) field, IGMPv3 hip Query messages, 740 QRV (Querier’s Robustness Variable) field, IGMPv3 hip Query messages, 739 Querier, 728-729 queries IGMPv2 messages, 731 General Query, 732 Group-Specific Query, 733 member discovery, multicast addresses, 726

1114

query messages, PIMv2 routers

query messages, PIMv2 routers, 773 Questions section, DNS message format, 950 queue types, T messages, 568

R RD (route distinguisher), 474-476 Reachability Information. See NLRI (Network Layer Reachability Information) Record Type field, IGMPv3 Group Record, 741 recursive lookup, 26 redistribute bgp statement, 182 redistribute connected command, 175 redistribution BGP NLRI into the IGP, 182 configuring NLRI in BGP, 162-167 redundancy multihoming and, 36 route reflection clusters, 596-603 redundancy schemes, reducing risk of access loss, 34 Referral WHOIS Server (RWHOIS), 56 Refuse message, 7 Regional Internet Registries (RIR), 54, 995 messages PIMv2 format, 811 PIMv2 routers, 797 B (Border bit) field, 811 Checksum field, 811 Multicast Data Packet field, 812 N (Null- bit) field, 812 Stop messages PIMv2 format, 812 PIMv2 routers, 798 Encoded Group Address field, 812 Encoded Unicast Source Address field, 812

-Suppression timer, 798 regular expressions, BGP policy configuration, 402 remote-as statement, 415 remove-private-as statement, 419 Rendezvous Point address, 722 Rendezvous Point (RP), 760 Auto-RP protocol, 789-790 bootstrap protocol, 787-789 configuring Auto-RP, 837-845 configuring sparse-dense mode, 845-849 configuring the bootstrap protocol, 849-855 Embedded RP addresses, 790-793 static configuration, 829-837 rendezvous point trees (RPTs), 776 Report messages (DVMRP), 888 reports, destination addresses, 728 requirements IP multicast routing, 716 CGMP (Cisco Group Management Protocol), 749-753 group hip, 724-729 IGMP (Internet Group Management Protocol), 729-741 IGMP/MLD Snooping, 745-749 IPv4 multicast addresses, 717-721 IPv6 multicast addresses, 721-724 MLD (Multicast Listener Discovery), 742-746 Réseaux IP Européens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC), 55 reserved Class D multicast addresses, 719 Reserved field CGMP packet format, 753 MSDP Source Active TLV format, 898 Reserved (Resv) field IGMPv3 hip Query messages, 739 IGMPv3 hip Report messages, 740

router bgp statement 1115

Resource Records (RR), 949 restart-interval argument, Maximum Prefixes feature, 542 restrictions, configuring ORF feature, 495 reuse limit (RFD), 479 Reverse Path Broadcasting (RPB), 756 Reverse Path Forwarding (RPF), 756, 821 RFCs 827, 2-3 888, 3 904, 3, 6 1092, 15 1105, 16 1112, 730 1163, 16 1191, 564 1267, 16 1631, 932 1700, 720 1918, 618 2236, 730-734 2283, 894-895 2365, 765, 882 2439, 479 2710, 742 2765, 998, 1038 3376, 730 3810, 742 3973, 773 4456, 593 4541, 748 4601, 786 4604, 736 4610, 790 4724, 538 4893, 3 5059, 787 5291, 486 5880, 512 5881, 512 6145, 998, 1002, 1038

6791, 1002 6793, 3 6996, 3 7020, 54 7346, 766, 883 7606, 893 7761, 806 RFD (Route Flap Dampening), 479-486 RIB-failure, 190 RIB (Routing Information Base), 19-20, 100-101, 539 RIID (RP Interface Identifier), 791-792 RIP-2, 3 RIPE NCC (Réseaux IP Européens Network Coordination Centre), 55 RIPE recommendations, RFD (Route Flap Dampening), 486 RIPng, 3 RIP (Routing Information Protocol), 3 RIR (Regional Internet Registries), 54, 995 Robustness Variable, query messages, 736 Rosen, Eric, 2 rotary keyword, 967 route aggregation, 41-42, 198 aggregate-address statement, 201-206 AS_SET attribute, 210-218 ATOMIC_AGGREGATE and AGGREGATOR attributes, 207-209 static routes, 199-200 route distinguisher (RD), 474-476 route filters, redistributing IGP routes into BGP, 162 Route Flap Dampening (RFD), 479-486 route maps BGP policy configuration, 403 MBGP policy configuration, 690, 696 route-map statement, 419 route policies, 21 Route Processors (RP), 539 router bgp hierarchy, 623 router bgp statement, 110

1116

route reflection cluster

route reflection cluster, 593 CLUSTER_LIST attribute, 596 configuration, 600-605 fully meshed clusters, 596 interconnecting links, 606 nested clusters, 595 ORIGINATOR_ID attribute, 595 peering relationship, 594 redundancy, 596-603 route-reflector-client statement, 419 route reflectors (RR) effect on memory consumption, 559-563 scaling BGP network, 592-606 Route Refresh, 559 ROUTE-REFRESH messages BGP, 85 ORF (Outbound Route Filters), 495 router-id statement, 923 Router processes (BGP), 554 Router-Query keyword, 773 routers (gateways), 2 multicast routing IGMPv2, 731-733 multicast forwarding, 754-756 multicast route discovery, 756-757 Non-Querier, 733 Querier, 728-729 queries, 726-728 shared trees, 787-796 routes, BGP process configuration ORF (Outbound Route Filters), 486-495 RFD (Route Flap Dampening), 479-486 route servers, 12 Route Target (RT), 476 Routing Information Base (RIB), 19-20, 100-101, 539 Routing Information Protocol (RIP), 3 routing loops, 15

routing protocols, 1 BGP (Border Gateway Protocol), 1 advertising BGP NLRI into the local AS, 182-198 AS_PATH attribute, 17-20 configuring and troubleshooting peering, 110-142 configuring NLRI, 155-167 connecting to multiple external neighbors, 77-79 decision process, 100-103 external versus interior BGP, 22-29 finite state machine, 87-90 MBGP (Multiprotocol BGP), 615-705 message formats, 103-108 message types, 85-87 NLRI and IBGP, 167-182 path attributes, 90-100 route aggregation, 198-218 scalability, 401-606 setting routing policy, 79-82 trust issues, 82-84 vector protocol, 17 versions, 16-17 CIDR (classless inter-domain routing), 41 address portability, 58-59 asg IPv4 address blocks, 54-56 classless routing, 43-47 limitations, 62-66 multihoming and provider-assigned addresses, 56-58 provider-independent addresses, 59-60 reducing Class B address space depletion, 50 reducing routing table explosion, 50-53 summarization, 41-50 traffic engineering, 60-62

scaling BGP

configuring IP multicast routing, 817 multicast load sharing, 856-862 PIM-DM (Protocol Independent Multicast-Dense Mode), 819-828 PIM-SM (Protocol Independent Multicast-Sparse Mode), 828-855 Exterior Gateway Protocol (EGP), 1 functions, 5-15 limitations, 15-16 origins, 2-3 topology, 3-5 NAT44 operation, 953 PIM-DM (Protocol Independent Multicast-Dense Mode), 773 designated routers, 782 forwarder election, 782-784 PIMv2 messages, 773-779 prune overrides, 779-781 unicast route changes, 782 PIM (Protocol Independent Multicast), 771-773 PIM-SM (Protocol Independent Multicast-Sparse Mode), 785 PIMv2 messages, 786, 808-817 RP (Rendezvous Point), 787-793 shared trees, 793-796 source registration, 796-802 SPTs (shortest path trees), 803-808 troubleshooting IP multicast routing, 863-864 mrinfo command, 865-867 mstat command, 869-872 mtrace command, 867-869 routing tables, 14, 50-53, 66-68 RP Address field, MSDP Source Active TLV format, 898 RP-Announce messages, 790 RPB (Reverse Path Broadcasting), 756 RP Count field, PIMv2 Bootstrap messages, 814 RP-Discovery messages, 790

RPF interfaces, PIM-SM inter-AS multicasting, 893-895 RPF (Reverse Path Forwarding), 756, 821 RP Holdtime field, PIMv2 Bootstrap messages, 815 RP Interface Identifier (RIID), 791-792 RP mapping agents, 789 RP Priority field, PIMv2 Bootstrap messages, 815 RP (Rendezvous Point), 760 Auto-RP protocol, 789-790 bootstrap protocol, 787-789 configuring Auto-RP, 837-845 configuring sparse-dense mode, 845-849 configuring the bootstrap protocol, 849-855 Embedded RP addresses, 790-793 static configuration, 829-837 RP (Route Processors), GR feature, 539 RP-Set, 788 RPT (rendezvous point trees), 776 RR (Resource Records), 949 RR (route reflectors), effect on memory consumption, 559-563 RT (Route Target), 476 rule of synchronization, 180-181 RWHOIS (Referral WHOIS Server), 56

S SAFI (Subsequent Address Family Identifier), 616 SAP (Session ment Protocol), 725 SA (Source Active) messages, 896-898 scalability, defined, 402 scaling scaling BGP, 401-402 BGP network, 569 4-byte AS numbers, 574-575 confederations, 576-592

1117

1118

scaling BGP

IBGP and the n-squared problem, 575-576 private AS numbers, 569-574 route reflectors, 592-606 configuration scaling tools, 402 communities, 425-478 peer groups, 403-413 peer templates, 413-425 functions, 478 BFD (Bidirectional Forwarding Detection), 512-523 U utilization, 552-556 Fast External Fallover, 509-512 GR (Graceful Restart), 538-540 Maximum Prefixes, 540-552 NHT (Next-Hop Tracking), 496-509 ORF (Outbound Route Filters), 486-496 PIC (Prefix Independent Convergence), 523-538 RFD (Route Flap Dampening), 479-486 transport optimization, 563-569 tuning BGP memory, 556-563 IP multicast routing, 881 Scanner processes (BGP), 554 scoping (multicast scoping), 762 istrative scoping, 765-766 IP multicast routing, 881-884 multicast addresses, 723 TTL scoping, 763-765 SDR (Session Description Protocol), 725 secondary servers (DNS), 949 second-level domains (DNS), 949 security, NAT44 operation, 946 Selective RIB , 563 send-community statement, 419-429, 672 send-label statement, 419 sequence numbers BGP policy configuration, 403 inheritance statements, 422

service distribution, configuring NAT44, 984-986 service-level agreements (SLAs), 31 Session ment Protocol (SAP), 725 session configuration statements, 660 Session Description Protocol (SDR), 725 session templates BGP configuration, 661 configuring BGP scalability, 414-418 configuring MBGP, 677-685, 701 inheritance, 417-418 set comm-list delete statement, 465-467 set community none statement, 203, 430-431, 468 set community statement, 425, 434, 460-462 settlement-free peering, 30 S field, IGMPv3 hip Query messages, 739 shared trees routers, 787-796 source-based trees versus, 759-761 source registration, 796-802 Shared WHOIS Project (SWIP), 56 shortest path trees (SPTs), 776, 803-808 show bfd neighbors [details] command, 515 show bgp all command, 645 show bgp all community command, 672 show bgp all summary command, 644 show bgp command, 634 show bgp ipv4 unicast command, 635 show bgp ipv4 unicast update-group command, 556 show bgp ipv6 unicast command, 634, 672 show bgp summary command, 120 show buffers command, 569 show commands, 864 show interfaces command, 569 show ip bgp 10.4.2.0 command, 467

SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol), NAT44 operationt 1119

show ip bgp 192.168.255.1 neighbor d-routes command, 530 show ip bgp command, 19, 20, 158, 207, 434, 467, 506, 526 show ip bgp community command, 436-440, 467, 687 show ip bgp community-list command, 441-443 show ip bgp community no-export command, 204, 217 show ip bgp dampened-paths command, 482-483 show ip bgp flap-statistics command, 482-483 show ip bgp ipv4 command, 905 show ip bgp ipv6 unicast community command, 687 show ip bgp neighbor command, 112, 490 show ip bgp neighbors {IP-Address} command, 543 show ip bgp peer-groups command, 407 show ip bgp replication command, 556 show ip bgp rib-failures command, 190 show ip bgp summary command, 120, 506, 556 show ip bgp template peer-policy command, 422-424 show ip bgp template peer-session command, 416-417 show ip bgp update-group command, 172, 410-411 show ip bgp update-group summary command, 411-413 show ip cef {ip-address}{mask} detail command, 526 show ip dvmrp route command, 888 show ip igmp group command, 777 show ip igmp interface command, 827 show ip mroute command, 776, 821, 864 show ip msdp peer command, 910 show ip nat statistics command, 988 show ip nat translations verbose command, 968

show ip pim bsr-router command, 851 show ip pim neighbor commands, 775 show ip pim rp command, 837, 841 show ip pim rp-hash command, 844, 855 show ip pim rp mapping command, 793, 843 show ip pim rp mapping in-use command, 844 show ip route bgp command, 653 show ip route command, 821, 864 show ip route repair-paths command, 526 show ip route summary command, 556 show ip spd command, 569 show ipv6 interface command, 647 show ipv6 nat translations command, 1013 show ipv6 route bgp command, 653 show ipv6 route command, 624, 634 show logging command, 137 show processes u command, 552-556 show processes memory command, 556 shutdown statement, 415 SIIT (Stateless IP/ICMP Translation), 997-999 fragmentation and PMTU, 1005-1007 header translation, 999, 1000 ICMP/ICMPv6 translation, 1002-1004 Transport Layer header translation, 1006 Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP), NAT44 operation, 953 Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP), NAT44 operation, 953 single-hop BFD templates, configuring, 522 site-local scope, private-use addresses, 618 SLAs (service-level agreements), 31 slow-peer statement, 419 slow start policy, RIRs, 55 slow timers (BFD), configuring, 514-520 SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol), NAT44 operation, 953

1120

SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol)

SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol), NAT44 operation, 953 snooping, IGMP/MLD Snooping, 745-749 SOA (Start-of-Authority) records, 949 soft-reconfiguration statement, 419 Solicited-Node multicast addresses, 723-724 sorted argument, show processes u command, 552 Source Active Request TLV (MSDP message), 899 Source Active Response TLV (MSDP message), 900 Source Active (SA) messages, 896-898 Source Active TLV (MSDP message), 898-899 source Address field, MSDP Source Active TLV format, 899 Source Address field IGMPv3 Group Record, 741 IGMPv3 hip Query messages, 740 source-based trees, shared trees versus, 759-761 source filtering, IGMPv2 versus IGMPv3, 735-736 Source-List-Change Record field, IGMPv3 Group Record, 741 source networks, 12 source registration, PIM-SM, 796-802 Source-Specific Multicast (SSM), 736 Source-Specific-Multicast (SSM), 761-762 sparse-dense mode (PIM), 845-849 sparsely-populated domains, 716 sparse topologies, multicast routing, 757 SPTs (shortest path trees), PIM-SM, 776, 803-808 SSM (Source-Specific-Multicast), 736, 761-762 standard community lists, 438-440 standard keyword, 445 Start-of-Authority (SOA) records, 949

stateful NAT64, 1038 configuring, 1041 limitations, 1043 operation, 1038-1040 Stateless IP/ICMP Translation (SIIT), 997 fragmentation and PMTU, 1005-1007 header translation, 999-1000 ICMP/ICMPv6 translation, 1002-1004 Transport Layer header translation, 1006 stateless NAT64 configuring, 1036 limitations, 1038 operation, 1031-1035 statements. See also commands accept-route-policy-rt, 419 additional-paths, 419 address-family ipv6, 623 , 419 -map, 419 ment-interval, 419 aggregate-address, 199, 201 allowas-in, 414, 419 allow-policy, 419 as-override, 419 bgp addditional-paths select best {number}, 534 bgp additional-paths, 534 bgp additional-paths select all, 534 bgp additional-paths select group-best, 534 bgp always-compare-med, 591 bgp bestpath med confed, 592 bgp deterministic-med, 591 bgp nexthop trigger delay, 498 bgp suppress-inactive, 166 bmp-activate, 414 buffer small permanent {value}, 569 capability, 419 capability orf prefix-list, 419 cluster-id, 414 default, 414, 419

statements 1121

default-metric, 159 default-originate, 419, 702 description, 414 disable-connected-check, 414 distribute-list, 419 dmzlink-bw, 419 ebgp-multihop, 414 ess-family ipv4, 629 exit-address-family, 623 exit-peer policy, 419

ipv6 nat v6v4 pool v4Pool, 1021 ipv6 pim rp embedded, 793 ipv6 route, 1036 ipv6 unicast-routing, 620, 632 ip virtual-reassembly, 956 local-as, 415 maximum-paths, 605 maximum-prefix, 419 nat64 enable, 1036 nat64 prefix stateful, 1041

exit-peer-session, 415 fall-over, 414 filter-list, 419 hold-queue {value} in, 568 inherit peer-session, 415 inter-as-hybrid, 419 interval-vpn-client, 419 ip bgp-community new-format, 426 ip bgp fast-external-fallover [permit | deny, 512 ip bgp new-format, 444-447 ip igmp querier-timeout, 733 ip igmp query-interval, 732 ip igmp query-max-response-time, 732 ip igmp version 1, 735 ip msdp redistribute, 912 ip msdp sa-request, 912 ip multicast-routing, 903 ip nat inside source, 977 ip nat inside source list, 965 ip nat pool, 965 ip nat translation max-entries, 968 ip nat translation timeout, 968 ip spd headroom {value}, 569 ipv6 multicast boundary block source, 885 ipv6 multicast boundary scope, 884 ipv6 nat, 1011 ipv6 nat prefix, 1011 ipv6 nat v4v6 source, 1018 ipv6 nat v4v6 source list, 1021

nat64 prefix stateless, 1036 nat64 v4 pool, 1041 nat64 v6v4 list, 1041 neighbor 192.168.1.253 send-community, 203 neighbor activate, 623 neighbor CLIENTS peer-group, 404 neighbor default-originate, 196-197 neighbor distribute-list, 197, 211 neighbor ebgp multi-hop, 403 neighbor ebgp multihop, 627 neighbor ebgp-multihop, 649 neighbor inherit peer-session, 415 neighbor {ip-address} additional-paths, 534 neighbor {ip-address} fall-over, 512 neighbor {ip-address} fall-over bfd, 514 neighbor {IP-Address} fall-over bfd, 516 neighbor {IP-Address} maximum-prefix {maximum}, 542 neighbor {ip-address} transport path-mtu-discovery {enable|disable}, 564 neighbor next-hop-self, 177, 185, 403, 657-659, 672 neighbor , 403, 657, 661 neighbor remote-as, 403, 621-623, 657 neighbor route-reflector-client, 601 neighbor send-community, 425, 435, 463-465 neighbor update-source, 185, 403, 649, 657

1122

statements

network, 156-160, 199 network mask, 160-161 next-hop-self, 419 next-hop-unchanged, 419 no bgp recursion host, 526 no bgp transport path-mtu-discovery, 564 no ip nat service alg t dns, 964 no ip nat service alg udp dns, 964 no neighbor activate, 642 no synchronization, 179

unsuppress-map, 419 update-source, 415 validation, 419 version, 415 weight, 419 static entries (NAT44), 934, 955-962 static one-to-one mapping, 1041 static routes configuring MBGP for IPv6, 622 distributing NLRI in a stub AS, 193-195

, 415 path-attribute, 415 permit, 166 policy configuration, 660 prefix-length-size, 419 prefix-list, 419 redistribute bgp, 182 remote-as, 415 remove-private-as, 419 route-map, 419 route-reflector-client, 419 router-id, 923 send-community, 419, 425-429, 672 send-label, 419 session configuration, 660 set comm-list delete, 465-467 set community, 425, 434, 460-462 set community none, 203, 430-431, 468 shutdown, 415 slow-peer, 419 soft-reconfiguration, 419 template peer-policy, 419 template peer-session, 414-415 timers, 415 translate-update, 415 transltate-topology, 419 transport, 415 ttl-security, 415

route aggregation, 199-200 single-homed AS, 31 stub AS (autonomous systems), 21-22 distributing NLRI in a stub AS with IBGP, 184-192 distributing NLRI in a stub AS with static routes, 193-195 multihoming, 31-36 stub gateways, 4 Sub-AFI (Subsequent AFI), 895 subautonomous systems, 576 subcodes (error subcodes), 108 subdelegation, 57 Subsequent Address Family Identifier (SAFI), 616 Subsequent AFI (Sub-AFI), 895 Subtype field, extended communities, 476 summarization, 41-50, 199 summary-only keyword, 203 summary-only option, aggregate-address statement, 202 SUN NIS+, IPv4 multicast address, 719 suppress limit (RFD), 479 SWIP (Shared WHOIS Project), 56 switched networks, multicast routing, 746-749 synchronization rule, 180-181 system buffers, T messages, 569

transport statement 1123

T T ACK message receipt, optimization, 568-569 T load balancing, configuring NAT44, 982-984 T load distribution, NAT44 operation, 942-943 T optimization, 563-568 T peering, MSDP and, 896 T (port 179), BGP and, 17 T Window Size, 563, 567 template peer-policy statement, 419 template peer-session statement, 414-415 templates, BFD configuring multihop BFD templates, 523 configuring single-hop BFD templates, 522 text descriptions (prefix lists), BGP policy configuration, 403 third-party EGP neighbors, 12 threshold, Maximum Prefixes feature, 541 timeouts, troubleshooting NAT44, 987 timers bgp command, 20 timers bgp configurtion statement, 86 timers egp command, 8 timers statement, 415 timestamps, 110 TLV (Type/Length/Value) format, MSDP messages, 898 Keepalive TLV, 900 Notification TLV, 900 Source Active Request TLV, 899 Source Active Response TLV, 900 Source Active TLV, 898-899 top-level domains (DNS), 949 topology, EGP (Exterior Gateway Protocol), 3-5 Total Path Attribute Length field, BGP Update messages, 106

traceroute, NAT44 operation, 953-954 traffic control, multihoming and, 37 traffic engineering, CIDR and, 60-62 transient groups (multicast), 719 transit AS (autonomous systems), 21-22, 30-31 Transitive (T) flag, 476 translate-update statement, 415 translation (IPv4 to IPv6) NAT-PT (Network Address Translation with Port Translation), 1007 configuration, 1010-1028 obsoletion, 1029-1031 operation, 1008 RFCs, 999 SIIT (Stateless IP/ICMP Translation), 997-998 header translation, 999-1000 ICMP/ICMPv6 translation, 1002-1004 stateful NAT64, 1038 configuration, 1041 limitations, 1043 operation, 1038-1040 stateless NAT64, 1031 configuration, 1036 limitations, 1038 operation, 1031-1035 translation timeout, NAT44, 936 translators, 997 translate-topology statement, 419 Transport Layer header translation, 1006 transport optimization, scaling BGP, 563 optimizing BGP UPDATE messages, 568 optimizing T, 563-568 optimizing T ACK message receipt, 568-569 transport statement, 415

1124

troubleshooting

troubleshooting BGP peering, 110 BGP connection security case study, 136-142 EBGP multihop case study, 127-135 EBGP peering case study, 110-114 EBGP peering over IPv6 case study, 114-118 IBGP peering case study, 118-127 IP multicast routing, 863 mrinfo command, 865-867 mstat command, 869-872 mtrace command, 867-869 NAT44, 986-988 TRPB (Truncated Reverse Path Broadcast), 756 trust issues, BGP routing policies, 82-84 TTL scoping, 763-765, 881 ttl-security statement, 415 TTL thresholds, MBone, 882 T (Transitive) flag, 476 tuning BGP memory, 556-563 tunnel connectivity DVMRP networks, 888-890 multicasting across nonmulticast domains, 885-887 tunnels, 997 Two-Octet AS-Specific extended communities, 477-478 Type field, 103 CGMP packet format, 753 extended communities, 476 IGMPv1 message format, 738 IGMPv2 message format, 737 MLDv1 messages, 743 PIMv2 message header, 809 Type/Length/Value (TLV) format, MSDP messages, 898 Keepalive TLV, 900

Notification TLV, 900 Source Active Request TLV, 899 Source Active Response TLV, 900 Source Active TLV, 898-899 type match-host keywords, 967 type rotary keywords, 984

U ULA (Unique Local Address) format, 619 unicasting, 713-715 unicast messages, 4 Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF), 757 unicast routing tables, PIM-DM (Protocol Independent Multicast-Dense Mode), 782 Unicast Source Address (USA), 750 unidirectional trees, 797 Unique Local Address (ULA) format, 619 unsolicited updates, 12 unsuppress-map statement, 419 update churn, 47 update groups, 407 message cache, 568 tuning U utilization og BGP processes, 556 Update messages (BGP), 86-87 format, 105-106 optimization, 568 update-source statement, 415 upper-layer header , IPv4 to IPv6 translation, 1006 upstream interface, 755-756 uRPF (Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding), 757 USA field, CGMP packet format, 753

zone transfer (DNS) 1125

USA (Unicast Source Address), 750 (customer) peering, 30

V v4-mapped keyword, 1021 v6-Routes (IPv6 prefix list), 625 validation statement, 419 Value field, extended communities, 476 vector protocols, BGP (Border Gateway Protocol), 17 Version 1 hip Report (0x12) messages, IGMPv2, 737 Version 2 hip Report (0x16) messages, IGMPv2, 737 Version field BGP Open messages, 104 CGMP packet format, 753 IGMPv1 message format, 738 PIMv2 message header, 809 version statement, 415 Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS), 31 Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), MPLS and, 474 Virtual Routing and Forwarding tables (VRFs), 474 virtual servers, NAT44 operation, 944 VPLS (Virtual Private LAN Service), 31 VPNs (Virtual Private Networks), MPLS and, 474 VRFs (Virtual Routing and Forwarding tables), 474

W warning-only keyword, 542 web-based schedules, advertising multicast groups, 724 Weight path attribute (BGP), 100 weight statement, 419 well-known communities, scaling BGP, 426-433 well-known discretionary path attributes, 90 well-known mandatory path attributes, 90 w ip pim interface command, 832 withdrawn routes, Update messages, 86 Withdrawn Routes field, BGP Update messages, 106 Withdrawn Routes Length field, BGP Update messages, 106

X–Z zones (DNS name servers), 949 zone transfer (DNS), 949