012007 Unfair Prejudice Booklet 722b5p

Shareholder Protection from Unfairly Prejudicial Conduct Case and Statute Citator

Commercial & Chancery Practice Group

Introduction Part 30 of the Companies Act 2006 enables a shareholder in a company who is being treated in an ‘unfairly prejudicial’ way to seek relief from the Court. Typically, these cases involve companies with relatively small numbers of shareholders. Those shareholders are usually also directors and may be the only directors of the company. The shareholders/directors will generally have fallen out with each other. Such falling out is often as a result of an exclusion of one shareholder/director by another from the affairs of the company. On other occasions, they may have fallen out because of the misappropriation by one shareholder/director of property belonging to the company or of a business opportunity that might have been enjoyed by the company. This legislation gives the Court very wide powers to control the conduct of the affairs of the company and its shareholders/directors. Such proceedings regularly result in the Court ordering that one shareholder/director should purchase the shares of another at a value determined by the Court to be fair in the circumstances.

Contents Statutory Basis

4

Procedure

5

Interim injunctions and security for cost

6

Nature of unfair prejudice

8

Petition struck out as abuse of process

13

What relief will be ordered?

15

2|

Unfair Prejudice Claims Case and Statute Citator Comprising law as of 1st March 2008

Andrew Marsden, St John’s Chambers Andrew Marsden was called to the Bar in 1994, having previously qualified and practised as a solicitor with Freshfields. Andrew is recognised as a company and commercial law expert and is described in the Legal 500 as ‘an excellent, commercially minded advocate who should go to the top’.

3|

Statutory Basis Member’s statutory right to petition for relief from unfair prejudice

Section 994 Companies Act 2006 (Previously Section 459 Companies Act 1985)

Secretary of State’s statutory right to petition for relief from unfair prejudice

Section 995 Companies Act 2006 (Previously Section 460 Companies Act 1985)

Court has unlimited power to make such order as it sees fit for giving relief in respect of unfair prejudice

Section 996 Companies Act 2006 (Previously Section 461 Companies Act 1985)

The right to petition under section 994 Companies Act 2006 is an inalienable statutory right which cannot be limited or removed whether by contractual agreement or otherwise

Exeter City AFC Ltd-v-The Football Conference Ltd [2005] 1 BCLC 238.

Definition of ‘member’

Section 112 Companies Act 2006 (Previously Section 22 Companies Act 1985) Re Nuneaton Borough AFC Ltd [1989] 5 BCC 377 Re a Company (No: 003160 of 1986) [1986] BCC 99,276 Re a Company (No: 007828 of 1985) [1986] 2 BCC 98,951 Re Quickdome Ltd [1988] BCLC 370 Jaber-v-Science & Info Tech Ltd [1992] BCLC 764 Re a Company (No: 00506 of 1995) (unreported) 29th June 1995 Atlasview Ltd-v-Brightview Ltd [2004] EWHC 1056 Re McCarthy Surfacing Ltd [2006] EWHC 832

Query whether a majority shareholder can complain of unfair prejudice 4|

Re Baltic Real Estate Ltd [1992] BCC 629 Re Legal Costs Negotiators Ltd [1999] BCC 547

The petitioner must have appropriate locus

Baker-v-Potter [2005] BCC 855 Re McCarthy Surfacing Ltd [2006] EWHC 832

Procedure Separate petition for each company in respect of which unfair prejudice is alleged

Re a Company [1984] BCLC 307

Form of petition

The Companies (Unfair Prejudice Applications) Proceedings Rules 1986 (SI 1986 No: 2000)

Who should be ed in the petition?

Re a Company (No: 007281 of 1986) [1987] 3 BCC 375 Re a Company (No: 005287 of 1985) [1986] 1 WLR 281 Re BSB Holdings Ltd [1992] BCC 915 Re Baltic Real Estate Limited [1992] BCC 629 Re Saul D Harrison & Sons plc [1995] BCLC 14 Supreme Travels Ltd-v-Little Olympian Each-Ways Limited [1994] BCC 947 Lowe-v-Fahey [1996] 1 BCLC 262 Re Ravenhart Service (Holdings) Ltd [2004] 2 BCLC 696

A respondent may have the petition struck out as against him if no relief will be granted against him and he will not be affected by an order detail

Supreme Travels Ltd-v-Little Olympian Each-Ways Ltd [1994] BCC 947

A prayer for a winding up should not be included where appropriate

R Practice Direction in respect of applications under the Companies Act 1985 and the Insurance Companies Act 1982 para 9(1)

Re a Company (No: 004415 of 1996) [1997] 1 BCLC 479

Re a Company (No: 004415 of 1996) [1997] 1 BCLC 479 5|

Rules of the Supreme Court applicable

Rule 2(2) of The Companies (Unfair Prejudice Applications) Proceedings Rules 1986 (SI 1986 No: 2000)

Leave required to serve petition outside of jurisdiction

Spiliada Maritime Corp-v-Cansulex Ltd [1987] AC 460 Re Harrods (Buenos Aires) Ltd [1991] BCC 249 Re Baltic Real Estate Ltd [1992] BCC 629

On return day the court will give directions for progress of petition (statements of case, preliminary issues, mediation, disclosure, witness statements, expert evidence, etc)

Re a Company (No: 002015 of 1996) [1997] 2 BCLC 1 Re Rotadata Ltd [2000] BCLC 122

Interim injunctions and security for cost Interim relief not available under section 461 Companies Act 1985 before unfair prejudice is established but interim injunctions are available under Supreme Court Act 1981

Re a Company (No: 004175 of 1986) [1987] 3 BCC 41 Re a Company (No: 004502 of 1988) [1991] BCC 234 Re Posgate & Denby (Agencies) Ltd [1986] 2 BCC 99 Re a Company (No: 00596 of 1986) [1986] 2 BCC 99,352 Re Sticky Fingers Restaurant Ltd [1991] BCC 754 Re Mountforest Ltd [1993] BCC 565 Lunn-v-All Starr Video Ltd [1993] 137 SJ 108 Re Tottenham Hotspur plc [1994] 1 BCLC 655

6|

Re a Company (No: 003061 of 1993) [1994] BCC 883 Re Whitchurch Insurance Consultants Ltd [1994] BCC 51 Re BML Group Ltd [1994] BCC 502 Wright, Petitioners [1997] BCC 198 Wilson-Davies-v-Kirk [1997] BCC 770 Corbett-v-Corbett [1998] BCC 93 Trident European Fund-v-Coats Holdings Ltd [2003] EWHC 2471 Re Ravenhart Service (Holdings) Ltd [2004] 2 BCLC 376 Re Premier Electronics (GB) Ltd [2002] 2 BCLC 634 Williams-v-Brinkmann [2004] EWHC 601 Interim orders may be refused if sufficient undertakings are given as to the future conduct of the company

Pringle-v-Callard [2007] EWCA Civ 1075

Security for costs may be ordered

Section 726 Companies Act 1985 R 25.12 Re Unisoft Group Ltd [1992] BCC 494 and [1994] BCC 11 Re Tottenham Hotspur plc (Unreported) July 1993

Not usually proper for respondents to use company funds to defend a petition

Re Sherborne Park [1986] 2 BCC 99,528 Re Kenyon Swansea [1987] 3 BCC 259 Re Crossmore Electrical and Civil Engineering Ltd [1989] 5 BCC 37 Re a Company (No: 005685 of 1988) [1989] 5 BCC 79 Re Hydrosan Ltd [1991] BCC 19 Re Milgate Developments Ltd [1991] BCC 24 Re a Company (No: 004502 of 1988) [1991] BCC 234

7|

Re a Company (No: 001126 of 1992) [1993] BCC 325

Corbett-v-Corbett [1998] BCC 93 Cas (Nominees) Ltd-v-Nottingham Forrest plc [2002] BCC 145 Arrow Trading & Investments-v-Edwardian Group Ltd [2003] EWHC 2863 Pollard-v-Pollard and others LTL 26/09/2007

Nature of unfair prejudice Unfair prejudice may consist of acts or omissions committed in the past, being currently committed or which are anticipated

Re Gorwyn Holdings Ltd [1985] 1 BCC 99,479 Re a Company [1987] BCLC 141 Re Kenyon Swansea Ltd [1987] 3 BCC 259 Re a Company (No: 00314 of 1989) [1990] BCC 221 Lloyd-v-Casey [2002] 1 BCLC 454

Unfair prejudice must comprise conduct of the company’s affairs and be an act or omission of the company or an act or omission on its behalf

Re a Company (No: 001761 of 1986) [1987] BCLC 141 Re Kenyon Swansea Ltd [1987] 3 BCC 259 Re Piccadilly Radio Plc [1989] 5 BCC 692 Re a Company (No: 00314 of 1989) [1990] BCC 221 Re a Company (No: 002470 of 1988) [1992] BCC 895 Re Unisoft Group Ltd (No: 3) [1994] 1 BCLC 609 Re Leeds United Holdings plc [1997] BCC 131 Re a Company (No: 00709 of 1992) [1997] 2 BCLC 739

Conduct complained of is ordinarily that of controllers of the company

8|

SCWS-v-Meyer [1959] AC 324 Re Bovey Hotel Ventures Ltd (unreported) 31 July 1981

Re R. A. Noble (Clothing) Ltd [1983] BCLC 273 Re a Company (No: 005287 of 1985) [1986] 1 WLR 281 Re a Company (No: 002470 of 1988) [1992] BCC 895 Re Saul D Harrison & Sons plc [1995] BCLC 14 Re Blue Arrow plc [1987] BCLC 585

‘Unfairness’ to be judged by ordinary meaning of the word and does not require infringement of legal rights. Keeping promises and honouring agreements are the ‘watchwords’

Re Saul D Harrison & Sons plc [1995] 1 BCLC 14 Re BSB Holdings Limited (No: 2) [1996] 1 BCLC 155 Re Marchday Group [1998] BCC 800 O’Neill-v-Phillips [1999] 1WLR 1092

Both ‘unfairness’ and ‘prejudice’ need to be established objectively

Re R. A. Noble (Clothing) Ltd [1983] BCLC 273 Re a Company (No: 008699 of 1985) [1986] 2 BCC 99,024 Re Ringtower Holdings plc [1989] 5 BCC 82 Re a Company (No: 002470 of 1988) [1992] BCC 895 Re Saul D Harrison & Sons plc [1995] 1 BCLC 14 Re Blackwood Lodge [1997] BCC 434

Petitioner’s shares need not have decreased in value

Re R. A. Noble (Clothing) Ltd [1983] BCLC 273

Petitioner’s interests in his capacity as a member must be affected by the conduct complained of

Re Saul D Harrison & Sons plc [1995] 1 BCLC 14

McGuiness, Petitioners [1988] 4 BCC 161

Re Alchemea Ltd [1998] BCC 964 Re a Company (No: 00709 of 1992) [1997] 2 BCLC 739

9|

Of primary importance in identifying rights and interests of are the memorandum and articles of association and any shareholders’ agreements

Re Saul D Harrison & Sons plc [1995] 1 BCLC 14

In certain cases unfair prejudice may arise despite the absence of any breach of a legal right but where there is only a failure to fulfil a ‘legitimate expectation’ of a member arising from an understanding or non legally binding agreement between which would make it unjust, unfair or inequitable were the majority permitted to enforce their strict legal rights. Such a ‘legitimate expectation’ might be that the member should continue to be employed as a director or/ and be allowed to participate in management of the company

Re a Company ( No: 00477 of 1986) [1989] 5 BCC 82

O’Neill-v-Phillips [1999] 1 WLR 1092

Re J E Cade & Son Ltd [1992] BCLC 213 Re Saul D Harrison & Sons plc [1995] 1 BCLC 14 Re R & H Electric Ltd-v-Haden Bill Electrical Ltd [1995] 2 BCLC 280 Re Leeds United Holdings plc [1997] BCC 131 Quinland-v-Essex Hinge Co Ltd [1997] BCC 53 Re a Company (No: 00709 of 1992) [1997] 2 BCLC 739 O’Neill-v-Phillips [1999] 1 WLR 1092 Mears-v-R Mears & Co (Holdings) Ltd [2002] 2 BCLC 1

It is unlikely that any ‘legitimate expectations’ will exist in relation to listed public companies

Re Astec (BSR) Plc [1998] 2 BCLC 556

Of itself, an irretrievable breakdown in relations does not constitute unfairly prejudicial conduct. There must be a ‘legitimate expectation’ of continuing involvement

Re a Company (No: 007623 of 1984) [1986] 2 BCC 99,191 Re a Company (No: 004377 of 1986) [1986] 1 WLR 102 O’Neill-v-Phillips [1999] 1 WLR 1092 McKee-v-O’Reilly [2003] EWHC 2008

Generally mere mismanagement will not constitute unfair prejudice though it might in extreme cases

Re Elgindata Ltd [1991] BCLC 959 Re a Company (No: 002470 of 1988) [1992] BCC 895 Re Macro (Ipswich) Ltd [1994] BCC 781

10 |

The petitioner’s own conduct may result in ‘prejudicial’ conduct not being’unfair’

Re London School of Electronics Ltd [1986] Ch 211 Re Ringtower Holdings plc [1989] 5 BCC 82 Baker-v-Potter [2005] BCC 855 Blackmore-v-Richardson [2005] EWCA Civ 1356 Grace-v-Biagioli [2006] BCC 85

If directors exceed the powers vested in them or exercise those powers otherwise than in the best interests of the company as a whole or otherwise breach their fiduciary duties a member may generally complain of unfair prejudice in the conduct of the company

Re D. R. Chemicals Ltd [1989] 5 BCC 39

Excessive remuneration

Re Cumana [1986] 2 BCC 99,453 and [1986] BCLC 430

Re Saul D Harrison & Sons plc [1995] 1 BCLC 14 Re BSB Holdings (No. 2) [1996] 1 BCLC 155 CAS (Nominees) Ltd-v-Nottingham Forrest plc [2002] BCC 145

Re Campbell Irvine (Holdings) Ltd [2006] EWHC 406

Failure to hold meetings

Re Nuneaton Borough AFC Ltd [1989] 5 BCC 792 Re Ghyll Beck Driving Range Ltd [1993] BCLC 1126 McGuinness, Petitioners [1988] 4 BCC 161

Failure properly to pay dividends

Re Sam Weller & Sons Ltd [1989] 5 BCC 810 Re Saul D Harrison & Sons plc [1995] 1 BCLC 14 Re a Company (No: 004415 of 1996) [1997] 1 BCLC 479 Re Metropolis Motorcycles Ltd [2006] EWHC 364

11 |

Misapplication of company funds or property

Re Stewarts (Brixton) Ltd [1985] BCLC 4 Re London School of Electronics Ltd [1986] Ch 211 Re Cumana Ltd [1986] BCLC 430 Re Elgindata Ltd [1991] BCLC 959 Re Little Olympian Each-Ways Ltd (No. 3) [1995] 1 BCLC 636

Unfair calls on shares

Re a Company (No: 008126 of 1989) [1992] BCC 542

Selective share issues

Re a Company (No: 007623 of 1984) [1986] 2 BCC 99,191 Re a Company (No: 0026712 of 1984) [1985] BCLC 80 Re D.R. Chemicals Ltd [1989] 5 BCC 39 Re Regional Airports Ltd [1999] 2 BCLC 30 Dalby-v-Bodilly [2004] EWCA 3078

Failure to provide proper information as to company’s affairs

Re a Company (No: 008699 of 1985 [1986] 2 BCC 99,024 Re R.A. Noble (Clothing) Ltd [1983] BCLC 273 Randall-v-S & F (Quarries) Ltd (unreported) 12 October 19947

Ignoring board decisions

Re H. R. Harmer Ltd [1959] 1 WLR 62

Wrongful registration of new

Re Piccadilly Radio plc [1989] 5 BCC 692

Misuse of company funds to pay for wrongdoers’ costs

Re Hydrosan Ltd [1991] BCC 19

12 |

Ex parte Johnson [1991] BCC 234

Committing criminal offences

Bermuda Cablevision Ltd-v-Colica Trust Co Ltd [1997] BCC 982

Directors must act fairly as between different classes of shareholders

Re BSB Holdings Ltd (No: 2) [1996] 1 BCLC 155

Delay in bringing proceedings may be a bar to relief

Re D R Chemicals Ltd [1989] 5 BCC 39 c.f. Price-v-Rawlings (unreported) Re Grandactual Ltd [2006] BCC 73

Petition struck out as abuse of process It may amount to an abuse of process for a person to issue a petition in circumstances where there has been unfair prejudice if the articles of association or shareholders’ agreement contains a mechanism for offering his shares to the other shareholders at a fair price and for calculating the fair price unless that person has first utilised that procedure

Re a Company (No: 07623 of 1984) [1986] 2 BCC 99,191

No abuse if impropriety affects value or valuation

Re a Company (No: 006834 of 1988) [1989] 5 BCC 218

Re a Company (No: 004377 of 1986) [1987] 1 WLR 102 Re Castleburn Ltd [1989] 5 BCC 652 Re Benfield Greig Group plc [2002] BCC 256

North Holdings Ltd-v-Southern Tropics Ltd [1999] BCC 746 c.f. Fuller-v-Cyracuse Ltd [2001] BCC 806 No abuse if mechanism for fixing price is not fair

Re a Company (No: 004377 of 1986) [1986] 1 WLR 102 Re Abbey Leisure Ltd [1990] BCC 60 Re a Company (No: 00330 of 1991) [1991] BCC 241 Re Copeland & Craddock Ltd [1997] BCC 294

13 |

North Holdings Ltd-v-Southern Tropics Ltd [1999] BCC 746

No abuse if valuer is not independent

Re Boswell & Co (Steels) Ltd [1989] 5 BCC 145 Re Benfiled Greig Group plc [2002] BCC 256

Issue of petition may amount to an abuse of process even though there has been unfair prejudice if clear that petitioner will have to sell his shares to the respondent and the petitioner has unreasonably rejected a reasonable offer to purchase his shares at a fair price

Re a Company (No: 003843 of 1986) [1987] 3 BCC 624 Re a Company (No: 003096 of 1987) [1988] 4 BCC 80 O’Neill-v-Phillips [1999] 1 WLR 1092 North Holdings Ltd-v-Southern Tropics Ltd [1999] BCC 746 West-v-Blanchet [2000] 1 BCLC 795 Wyatt-v-Frank Wyatt & Son Ltd [2003] EWHC 520 Isaacs-v-Belfield Furnishings Ltd [2006] All ER (D) 216

It may amount to an abuse of process if the actions complained of amount only to breaches of duties owed by directors such that the appropriate method of complaint would be by means of a derivative action rather than by an unfair prejudice petition

Re Chime Corp Ltd [2004] 3 HKLR 922

Uncertain whether petition will be stayed in face of an agreement to arbitrate

Re Vocam Europe plc [1998] BCC 396

c.f. Re Brightview Ltd [2004] BCC 542

Shalson-v-D. F. Keane (unreported) 21 March 2003 Eurotunnel-v-Balfour Beatty [1992] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 7 Exeter City AFC Ltd-v-Football Conference Ltd [2005] 1 BCLC 238

14 |

What relief will be ordered? No limit on types of order court may make to give relief in respect of matters complained of. Petitioner must state relief he seeks

Section 996 Companies Act 2006 (Previously Section 461 Companies Act 1985) Re Bird Precision Bellows [1986] Ch 658 Re Nuneaton Borough AFC Ltd (No:2) [1991] BCC 44 Each-Ways Ltd [1994] BCC 947 Supreme Travels Ltd-v-Little Olympian Re J.E. Cade & Son Ltd [1992] BCLC 213 c.f. Re Full Cup Int. Trading Ltd [1998] BCC 58

The court will not grant relief where it will serve no substantially useful purpose

Re a Comapnay (No: 008126 of 1989) [1992] BCC 542 Re Full Cup Int. Trading Ltd [1998] BCC 58 Re Hailey Group Ltd [1993] BCLC 459

Court will grant the minimum remedy to repair the misconduct and unfair prejudice suffered

Grace-v-Biagioli [2006] BCC 85

Often relief given by buy out order at price fixed by court in light of expert valuation evidence

Re D. R. Chemicals Ltd [1989] 5 BCC 39

Re Metropolis Motorcycles Ltd [2006] 364

Re Nuneaton Borough AFC Ltd [1989] 5 BCC 792 Re Nuneaton Borough AFC Ltd (No: 2) [1991] BCC 44

Rarely will court order a majority shareholder to cede control to a minority shareholder

Re a Company (No: 003843 of 1986) [1987] 3 BCC 624 Re a Company (No: 006834 of 1988) [1989] 5 BCC 218 Re Brenfield Squash Rackets Club Ltd [1996] 2 BCLC 184 Nuneaton Borough AFC Ltd [1989] 5 BCC 792

15 |

Impecuniosity of proposed purchaser irrelevant

Re Cumana Ltd [1986] BCLC 430

Payment on can be ordered

Ferguson-v-Maclennan Salmon Co Ltd [1990] BCC 702 Dalby-v-Bodilly [2004] EWCA 3078

Buyout price to be fair

Re Bird Precision Bellows Ltd [1986] Ch 658

Buyout price to take of reduction in share value as a consequence of unfairly prejudicial conduct

Re D. R. Chemicals Ltd 5 BCC 39

In ‘quasi-partnership’ cases there is generally no discount applied to reflect minority shareholding status. Position is otherwise where not a ‘quasi-partnership’

Re Bird Precision Bellows Ltd [1984] Ch 658 Re D. R. Chemicals Ltd [1989] 5 BCC 39 Howie-v-Crawford [1990] BCC 330 Re Elgindata Ltd [1991] BCLC 959 Re Planet Organic Ltd [2000] 1 BCLC 366 CVC Opportunity Equity Partners Ltd-vDemarco Almeida [2002] 2 BCLC 108 Phoenix Office Supplies Ltd-v-Larvin [2002] EWCA Civ 1740 Re Jayflex Construction Ltd [2003] EWHC 2008 Strahan-v-Wilcock [2006] EWCA Civ 13 Re Campbell Irvine (Holdings) ltd (No:2) [2006] EWHC 583

Generally valued as at date of buy out order but this may be varied if justice of case requires

Re London School of Electronics Ltd [1986] Ch 211 Re Cumana Ltd [1986] BCLC 430 Re O. C. Transport Services Ltd [1984] 1 BCC 99,068 Re D.R. Chemicals Ltd [1989] 5 BCC 39

16 |

Re a Company (No: 008126 of 1989) [1992] BCC 542 Profinance Trust SA-v-Gladstone [2002] BCC 356 Re Clearsprings (Management) Ltd [2003] EWHC 2516 Bennett-v-Bennett (unreported) 17 January 2003 Interest may be awarded in addition to price

Harrison-v-Thompson [1992] BCC 962

Relief may also take the form of orders regulating conduct of the affairs of the company

Re H R Harmer Ltd [1959] 1 WLR 62

Profinance Trust-v-Gladstone [2002] 1 BCLC 141

Whyte, Petitioner 1984 SLT 330 McGuiness-v-Bremner plc [1988] BCLC 673 Grace-v-Biagioli [2006] 2 BCLC 70

Relief may also take form of an order to make good a company’s assets and a shareholder will not be penalised from seeking such relief merely because he will only benefit as a creditor because of the insolvency of the company.

Gamlestaden Fastigheter ATS-v-Baltic Partners Ltd [2007] UKPC 26

Declaratory relief may also be given (even on a summary basis)

Hawkes-v-Cuddy & others [2007] EWHC 1789

Other specified forms of relief

Section 996 Companies Act 2006

AB-v-Baltic Partners Ltd [2007] UKPC 26

(Previously Section 461(2) Companies Act 1985 Petition to wind up may be adjourned pending determination of claim for relief under Section 994 Companies Act 2006

17 |

Re Minrealm Ltd [2007] EWHC 3078

Commercial & Chancery Practice Group

Robin Neill, Head of Practice Group Leslie Blohm QC David Fletcher John Blackmore Richard Stead Charles Auld Peter Wadsley Nicholas Ashton Guy Adams Andrew Marsden John Sharples James Pearce-Smith John Dickinson Alex Troup Christopher Jones Suella Fernandes Richard Gold Andrew Kearney Martin Mann QC (Associate Member) Peter Ralls QC (Associate Member) Rob Bocock, Practice Manager Direct Line 0117 923 4714 Email [email protected]

© St John’s Chambers, March 2008

1979 1982 1971 1983 1979 1980 1984 1982 1989 1994 1992 2002 1995 1998 2004 2005 2006 2007 1968 1972

101 Victoria Street Bristol BS1 6PU DX 78138 Bristol 0117 921 3456 0117 929 4821

TELEPHONE FAX

[email protected] www.stjohnschambers.co.uk COMMERCIAL & CHANCERY PRACTICE GROUP

0117 923 4740 FAMILY PRACTICE GROUP

0117 923 4720 PERSONAL INJURY PRACTICE GROUP

0117 923 4730 PUBLIC & ISTRATIVE LAW PRACTICE GROUP

0117 923 4740